• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗、组织型纤溶酶原激活剂或玻璃体切割术治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞所致黄斑水肿的长期预后

Long-term outcomes of intravitreous bevacizumab or tissue plasminogen activator or vitrectomy for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion.

作者信息

Kumagai Kazuyuki, Ogino Nobuchika, Fukami Marie, Furukawa Mariko

机构信息

Kami-iida Daiichi General Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan,

Shinjo Ophthalmologic Institute, Miyazaki, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr 11;13:617-626. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S195600. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S195600
PMID:31043767
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6469473/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term outcomes of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) or intravitreal tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or vitrectomy for macular edema associated with a branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, interventional case series. Forty-one patients received a single 1.25 mg of IVB injection and followed by pro re nata protocol, 71 patients received a single intravitreal tPA, and 116 patients underwent phacovitrectomy with intraocular lens implantation.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics and follow-up periods were not significantly different among the three groups. The mean follow-up period was 55.5 months with a range of 12-160 months. Sixteen patients (39.0%) in the IVB group, 24 patients (33.8%) in the tPA group, and two patients (1.7%) in the vitrectomy group underwent additional surgeries during the follow-up period. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) significantly improved in all groups at 1 year after the initial treatment (all, <0.0001) and at the final visit (all, <0.0001). The differences in the BCVA between the three groups were not significant at all times after the initial treatment.

CONCLUSION

The three groups led to similar long-term good visual outcomes. However, additional surgeries were performed in more than 30% of patients in the IVB and tPA groups.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗(IVB)、玻璃体内注射组织纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)或玻璃体切割术治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞(BRVO)相关黄斑水肿的长期疗效。

方法

这是一项回顾性干预病例系列研究。41例患者接受单次1.25mg的IVB注射,随后按需治疗,71例患者接受单次玻璃体内注射tPA,116例患者接受晶状体植入的晶状体玻璃体切除术。

结果

三组患者的基线特征和随访时间无显著差异。平均随访时间为55.5个月,范围为12 - 160个月。IVB组16例患者(39.0%)、tPA组24例患者(33.8%)和玻璃体切割术组2例患者(1.7%)在随访期间接受了额外手术。初始治疗后1年时(所有组,<0.0001)和末次随访时(所有组,<0.0001),所有组的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)均显著改善。初始治疗后各时间点,三组之间的BCVA差异均无统计学意义。

结论

三组均取得了相似的长期良好视力预后。然而,IVB组和tPA组超过30%的患者接受了额外手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e87e/6469473/ea0caaac2e33/opth-13-617Fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e87e/6469473/f13c9adfdbf4/opth-13-617Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e87e/6469473/faa90d67d22b/opth-13-617Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e87e/6469473/5e3f9aa52912/opth-13-617Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e87e/6469473/6f9e34239899/opth-13-617Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e87e/6469473/ea0caaac2e33/opth-13-617Fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e87e/6469473/f13c9adfdbf4/opth-13-617Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e87e/6469473/faa90d67d22b/opth-13-617Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e87e/6469473/5e3f9aa52912/opth-13-617Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e87e/6469473/6f9e34239899/opth-13-617Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e87e/6469473/ea0caaac2e33/opth-13-617Fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes of intravitreous bevacizumab or tissue plasminogen activator or vitrectomy for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion.玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗、组织型纤溶酶原激活剂或玻璃体切割术治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞所致黄斑水肿的长期预后
Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr 11;13:617-626. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S195600. eCollection 2019.
2
Three treatments for macular edema because of branch retinal vein occlusion: intravitreous bevacizumab or tissue plasminogen activator, and vitrectomy.三种治疗分支静脉阻塞性黄斑水肿的方法:玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗或组织型纤溶酶原激活剂,以及玻璃体切除术。
Retina. 2012 Mar;32(3):520-9. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31822529e2.
3
25-gauge vitrectomy versus intravitreal bevacizumab for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: 1 year follow-up.25G 玻璃体切割术与玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿:1 年随访。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2012 Jul;41(7):294-9.
4
Prospective study of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide versus bevacizumab for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion.前瞻性研究曲安奈德与贝伐单抗治疗视网膜中央静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿。
Retina. 2011 May;31(5):838-45. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181f4420d.
5
Bevacizumab versus Dexamethasone Implant Followed by Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Macula Edema Associated with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.贝伐单抗与地塞米松植入剂继以贝伐单抗治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞相关黄斑水肿的比较
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;32(1):29-37. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2016.0134. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
6
Effects of Vitrectomy on Recurrent Macular Edema due to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion after Intravitreal Injection of Bevacizumab.玻璃体切割术对玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗后视网膜分支静脉阻塞所致复发性黄斑水肿的影响。
J Ophthalmol. 2013;2013:415974. doi: 10.1155/2013/415974. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
7
Comparison of injection of intravitreal drugs with standard care in macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿时玻璃体内注射药物与标准治疗的比较。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;28(1):19-25. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2014.28.1.19. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
8
Intravitreal bevacizumab versus triamcinolone acetonide for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion: a matched study.玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗与曲安奈德治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞所致黄斑水肿的对比:一项配对研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Nov 20;122(22):2695-9.
9
Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab for macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion stratified by baseline visual acuity.玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞后黄斑水肿的疗效,按基线视力分层分析
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;255(4):691-697. doi: 10.1007/s00417-016-3535-3. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
10
Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide versus bevacizumab therapy for macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion.玻璃体内曲安奈德与贝伐单抗治疗与分支视网膜静脉阻塞相关的黄斑水肿。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Jul;248(7):963-71. doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1320-2. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative efficacy of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept for treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.贝伐单抗、雷珠单抗和阿柏西普治疗视网膜静脉阻塞性黄斑水肿的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Sep;11(9):903-916. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2018.1507735. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
2
The use of bevacizumab and ranibizumab for branch retinal vein occlusion in medicare beneficiaries.贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗在医疗保险受益人群中用于视网膜分支静脉阻塞的情况。
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2018 Jun 19;11:105-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2018.06.005. eCollection 2018 Sep.
3
Recent advances in understanding and managing retinal vein occlusions.
视网膜静脉阻塞的认识与管理的最新进展
F1000Res. 2018 Apr 16;7:467. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.12886.1. eCollection 2018.
4
Cost Evaluation of Early Vitrectomy versus Panretinal Photocoagulation and Intravitreal Ranibizumab for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.增生型糖尿病视网膜病变行早期玻璃体切割术与全视网膜光凝及玻璃体内雷珠单抗治疗的成本评估
Ophthalmology. 2018 Sep;125(9):1393-1400. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.02.038. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
5
The outcome of low-frequency intravitreal bevacizumab therapy for macular edema in retinal vein occlusions.视网膜静脉阻塞性黄斑水肿的低频玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗治疗结果
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 21;11:1183-1190. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S137380. eCollection 2017.
6
Comparison of Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusions in Routine Clinical Practice.雷珠单抗与贝伐单抗治疗视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的常规临床实践比较
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017 Jun 1;48(6):465-472. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20170601-04.
7
Therapies for Macular Edema Associated with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.与分支视网膜静脉阻塞相关的黄斑水肿治疗:美国眼科学会报告。
Ophthalmology. 2017 Sep;124(9):1412-1423. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.060. Epub 2017 May 24.
8
Effect of Bevacizumab vs Aflibercept on Visual Acuity Among Patients With Macular Edema Due to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: The SCORE2 Randomized Clinical Trial.贝伐单抗与阿柏西普对视网膜中央静脉阻塞所致黄斑水肿患者视力的影响:SCORE2随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 May 23;317(20):2072-2087. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.4568.
9
New Developments in the Classification, Pathogenesis, Risk Factors, Natural History, and Treatment of Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.视网膜分支静脉阻塞的分类、发病机制、危险因素、自然史及治疗的新进展
J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:4936924. doi: 10.1155/2017/4936924. Epub 2017 Mar 12.
10
Cost-effectiveness of Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment: Analysis From the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Comparative Effectiveness Trial.阿柏西普、贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的成本效益:来自糖尿病视网膜病变临床研究网络比较疗效试验的分析
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 1;134(8):888-96. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1669.