• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学生参与医学和兽医学教育治理:学生代表和项目主任的经验和观点。

Student participation in governance of medical and veterinary education: experiences and perspectives of student representatives and program directors.

机构信息

Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Graduate School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019 Oct;24(4):665-690. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09890-9. Epub 2019 May 1.

DOI:10.1007/s10459-019-09890-9
PMID:31044324
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6775033/
Abstract

Student participation in governance of education is of growing interest. However, it remains unclear what factors render this participation in institutional governance a success or a failure. Another question is: what are the perceived benefits for schools and students? We empirically explored experiences and perspectives of student representatives and program directors of all (8) medical and (1) veterinary schools in the Netherlands on factors that influence student participation in institutional governance and its values and challenges for schools and student representatives. A constructivist grounded theory study was performed. A theoretical sample of student representatives was invited to fill out an explorative, qualitative questionnaire. Next, focus groups with student representatives and interviews with all program directors were conducted. Data was analyzed using open, axial and selective coding by all authors. Experiences and perspectives of students and program directors were remarkably similar in both perceived influences and values. Four main categories of influences could be distinguished in student participation: (1) individual student characteristics, (2) individual staff characteristics, (3) the organization of student representatives and (4) the school's organization, including its culture and policy regarding student participation. A cohesive, well-organized and independent student organization has crucial impact on student participation in educational governance processes. For representatives, major benefits of participation are personal and career development. Challenges are low effectiveness and efficiency of their actions. A clear school policy on student participation and better introduction, feedback and coaching of representatives should be provided to improve student participation in governance processes.

摘要

学生参与教育治理越来越受到关注。然而,什么因素使得这种参与机构治理取得成功或失败还不清楚。另一个问题是:学校和学生认为有什么好处?我们对荷兰所有(8)所医学院和(1)所兽医学院的学生代表和项目主任的经验和观点进行了实证研究,以探讨影响学生参与机构治理及其对学校和学生代表的价值和挑战的因素。进行了一项建构主义扎根理论研究。邀请了理论样本的学生代表填写一份探索性的、定性的问卷。然后,对学生代表进行焦点小组讨论,并对所有项目主任进行访谈。所有作者都使用开放式、轴向和选择性编码对数据进行分析。学生和项目主任的经验和观点在感知影响和价值观上非常相似。在学生参与方面,可以区分出四个主要的影响类别:(1)学生个人特征,(2)教职员工个人特征,(3)学生代表的组织,以及(4)学校的组织,包括其文化和学生参与政策。一个有凝聚力、组织良好和独立的学生组织对学生参与教育治理过程有至关重要的影响。对于代表来说,参与的主要好处是个人和职业发展。挑战是他们行动的效果和效率低下。应该提供明确的学校参与学生政策,并更好地介绍、反馈和指导代表,以提高学生参与治理过程的程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4180/6775033/fc1be199baf6/10459_2019_9890_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4180/6775033/fc1be199baf6/10459_2019_9890_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4180/6775033/fc1be199baf6/10459_2019_9890_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Student participation in governance of medical and veterinary education: experiences and perspectives of student representatives and program directors.学生参与医学和兽医学教育治理:学生代表和项目主任的经验和观点。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019 Oct;24(4):665-690. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09890-9. Epub 2019 May 1.
2
Partnered Educational Governance: Rethinking Student Agency in Undergraduate Medical Education.合作式教育治理:反思本科医学教育中学生的能动性。
Acad Med. 2019 Oct;94(10):1443-1447. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002777.
3
Developing the master educator: cross disciplinary teaching scholars program for human and veterinary medical faculty.培养主教育者:面向人类医学和兽医学教师的跨学科教学学者项目
Acad Psychiatry. 2007 Nov-Dec;31(6):452-64. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.31.6.452.
4
Student engagement in medical education: A mixed-method study on medical students as module co-directors in curriculum development.医学生作为课程开发模块联合主任参与医学教育:一项混合方法研究
Med Teach. 2019 Oct;41(10):1143-1150. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1623385. Epub 2019 Jun 16.
5
Fostering Student-Faculty Partnerships for Continuous Curricular Improvement in Undergraduate Medical Education.促进师生合作,持续改进本科医学教育课程。
Acad Med. 2019 Jul;94(7):996-1001. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002726.
6
Implementing a Student Progress Committee: the student and faculty perspectives.设立学生进步委员会:学生与教师的视角
J Vet Med Educ. 2005 Summer;32(2):223-7. doi: 10.3138/jvme.32.2.223.
7
Outcomes of Australian rural clinical schools: a decade of success building the rural medical workforce through the education and training continuum.澳大利亚农村临床医学院的成果:通过教育与培训连续统一体成功打造农村医疗劳动力的十年。
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Jul-Sep;15(3):2991. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
8
Student, Faculty, and Coach Perspectives on Why Athletes Excel in Medical School: A Qualitative Analysis.学生、教师和教练对运动员为何能在医学院表现出色的看法:定性分析。
Teach Learn Med. 2022 Jan-Mar;34(1):43-59. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2021.1921584. Epub 2021 Jul 11.
9
Hierarchy, "Kreng Jai" and Feedback: A Grounded Theory Study Exploring Perspectives of Clinical Faculty and Medical Students in Thailand.层级、“克恩贾伊”与反馈:一项扎根理论研究,探索泰国临床教师和医学生的观点
Teach Learn Med. 2021 Jun-Jul;33(3):235-244. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1813584. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
10
Coproducing clinical curricula in undergraduate medical education: Student and faculty experiences in longitudinal integrated clerkships.本科医学教育中共同制定临床课程:纵向综合实习中学生和教师的经验。
Med Teach. 2021 Nov;43(11):1267-1277. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1935825. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the landscape of student representation in medical curriculum development across U.S. MD schools: A comparative analysis.探索美国医学博士(MD)院校医学课程开发中学生代表性的情况:一项比较分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 22;25(1):747. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07114-w.
2
Student Engagement in Medical Research Curriculum Development Strategies: A Comprehensive Approach Utilizing Mixed-Methods Study and SWOT-TOWS-AHP Analysis.学生参与医学研究课程开发策略:一种运用混合方法研究及SWOT-TOWS-AHP分析的综合方法
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Nov 14;35(2):741-754. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02226-2. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Students as co-designers in health professional education: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Twelve tips for enhancing student engagement.增强学生参与度的 12 个技巧。
Med Teach. 2019 Jun;41(6):632-637. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1459530. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
2
Medical Students' Perspectives on Implementing Curriculum Change at One Institution.医学生对一所院校课程改革的看法。
Acad Med. 2017 Apr;92(4):455-461. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001569.
3
Student participation: to the benefit of both the student and the faculty.学生参与:对学生和教师双方都有益。
学生作为健康职业教育中的共同设计者:一项范围综述
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 3;25(1):645. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07110-0.
4
Fueling Inner Resources Through Co-Creation: A Scoping Review on the Impact of Co-Creation of Education on Learners' Well-Being.通过共同创造激发内在资源:关于教育共同创造对学习者幸福感影响的范围综述
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 Mar 25;14(1):129-140. doi: 10.5334/pme.1726. eCollection 2025.
5
Achieving 'something that everybody has invested in': perspectives of diverse stakeholders during co-creation of a transition to residency curriculum.实现“人人都投入其中的事情”:在共同创建住院医师课程过渡课程期间,不同利益相关者的观点。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jun 11;24(1):650. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05573-1.
6
Mapping student engagement in health professions education policy and decision-making: a scoping review.映射学生参与卫生专业教育政策和决策:范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 22;24(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05283-8.
7
Making a Medical School Class Whole: A Holistic Approach to Student Government.打造完整的医学院班级:学生自治的整体方法。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020 Jul 6;7:2382120520932554. doi: 10.1177/2382120520932554. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2015 Jan-Apr;28(1):79-82. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.161921.
4
Peer-assisted learning--beyond teaching: How can medical students contribute to the undergraduate curriculum?同伴互助学习——超越教学:医学生如何为本科课程做出贡献?
Med Teach. 2014 Sep;36(9):812-7. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.917158. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
5
Grounded theory in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 70.扎根理论在医学教育研究中的应用:AMEE 指南第 70 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(10):850-61. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.704439. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
6
Development and validation of a competency framework for veterinarians.兽医能力框架的制定与验证
J Vet Med Educ. 2011 Fall;38(3):262-9. doi: 10.3138/jvme.38.3.262.
7
Acting on evaluation: twelve tips from a national conference on student evaluations.基于评估采取行动:来自一场关于学生评估的全国性会议的十二条建议。
Med Teach. 2009 Feb;31(2):101-4. doi: 10.1080/01421590802225788.
8
The CanMEDS initiative: implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies.加拿大医学教育方向与角色(CanMEDS)倡议:实施基于结果的医生能力框架。
Med Teach. 2007 Sep;29(7):642-7. doi: 10.1080/01421590701746983.
9
[Consequences of the Law on Higher Education and Scientific Research for medical education].[《高等教育与科研法》对医学教育的影响]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1994 Jul 2;138(27):1378-80.