Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Graduate School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019 Oct;24(4):665-690. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09890-9. Epub 2019 May 1.
Student participation in governance of education is of growing interest. However, it remains unclear what factors render this participation in institutional governance a success or a failure. Another question is: what are the perceived benefits for schools and students? We empirically explored experiences and perspectives of student representatives and program directors of all (8) medical and (1) veterinary schools in the Netherlands on factors that influence student participation in institutional governance and its values and challenges for schools and student representatives. A constructivist grounded theory study was performed. A theoretical sample of student representatives was invited to fill out an explorative, qualitative questionnaire. Next, focus groups with student representatives and interviews with all program directors were conducted. Data was analyzed using open, axial and selective coding by all authors. Experiences and perspectives of students and program directors were remarkably similar in both perceived influences and values. Four main categories of influences could be distinguished in student participation: (1) individual student characteristics, (2) individual staff characteristics, (3) the organization of student representatives and (4) the school's organization, including its culture and policy regarding student participation. A cohesive, well-organized and independent student organization has crucial impact on student participation in educational governance processes. For representatives, major benefits of participation are personal and career development. Challenges are low effectiveness and efficiency of their actions. A clear school policy on student participation and better introduction, feedback and coaching of representatives should be provided to improve student participation in governance processes.
学生参与教育治理越来越受到关注。然而,什么因素使得这种参与机构治理取得成功或失败还不清楚。另一个问题是:学校和学生认为有什么好处?我们对荷兰所有(8)所医学院和(1)所兽医学院的学生代表和项目主任的经验和观点进行了实证研究,以探讨影响学生参与机构治理及其对学校和学生代表的价值和挑战的因素。进行了一项建构主义扎根理论研究。邀请了理论样本的学生代表填写一份探索性的、定性的问卷。然后,对学生代表进行焦点小组讨论,并对所有项目主任进行访谈。所有作者都使用开放式、轴向和选择性编码对数据进行分析。学生和项目主任的经验和观点在感知影响和价值观上非常相似。在学生参与方面,可以区分出四个主要的影响类别:(1)学生个人特征,(2)教职员工个人特征,(3)学生代表的组织,以及(4)学校的组织,包括其文化和学生参与政策。一个有凝聚力、组织良好和独立的学生组织对学生参与教育治理过程有至关重要的影响。对于代表来说,参与的主要好处是个人和职业发展。挑战是他们行动的效果和效率低下。应该提供明确的学校参与学生政策,并更好地介绍、反馈和指导代表,以提高学生参与治理过程的程度。