Wu Hsiang-Ling, Tai Ying-Hsuan, Chang Wen-Kuei, Chang Kuang-Yi, Tsou Mei-Yung, Cherng Yih-Giun, Lin Shih-Pin
Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(18):e15442. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015442.
Whether morphine used in human cancer surgery would exert tumor-promoting effects is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effects of morphine dose on cancer prognosis after colorectal cancer (CRC) resection.In a retrospective study, 1248 patients with stage I through IV CRC undergoing primary tumor resections and using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for acute surgical pain at a tertiary center between October 2005 and December 2014 were evaluated through August 2016. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using proportional hazards regression models.Multivariable analysis demonstrated no dose-dependent association between the amount of morphine dose and PFS (adjusted hazard ratio, HR = 1.31, 95% confidence interval, CI = 0.85-2.03) or OS (adjusted HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.47-1.55). Patients were further classified into the high-dose and low-dose groups by the median of morphine consumption (49.7 mg), and the morphine doses were mean 75.5 ± standard deviation 28.8 mg and 30.1 ± 12.4 mg in high-dose and low-dose groups, respectively. Multivariable models showed no significant difference in PFS or OS between groups, either (adjusted HR = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.97-1.58 for PFS; adjusted HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.71-1.43 for OS).Our results did not support a definite association between postoperative morphine consumption and cancer progression or all-cause mortality in patients following CRC resection.
吗啡用于人类癌症手术是否会产生促肿瘤作用尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨吗啡剂量对结直肠癌(CRC)切除术后癌症预后的影响。在一项回顾性研究中,对2005年10月至2014年12月期间在某三级中心接受原发性肿瘤切除并使用静脉自控镇痛治疗急性手术疼痛的1248例Ⅰ至Ⅳ期CRC患者进行了评估,随访至2016年8月。使用比例风险回归模型分析无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。多变量分析显示,吗啡剂量与PFS(调整后风险比,HR = 1.31,95%置信区间,CI = 0.85 - 2.03)或OS(调整后HR = 0.86,95%CI = 0.47 - 1.55)之间不存在剂量依赖性关联。根据吗啡消耗量的中位数(49.7mg)将患者进一步分为高剂量组和低剂量组,高剂量组和低剂量组的吗啡剂量分别为平均75.5±标准差28.8mg和30.1±12.4mg。多变量模型显示,两组之间的PFS或OS也无显著差异(PFS的调整后HR = 1.24,95%CI = 0.97 - 1.58;OS的调整后HR = 1.01,95%CI = 0.71 - 1.43)。我们的结果不支持CRC切除术后患者术后吗啡消耗量与癌症进展或全因死亡率之间存在明确关联。