Church Jessica A, Cirino Paul T, Miciak Jeremy, Juranek Jenifer, Vaughn Sharon, Fletcher Jack M
The University of Texas at Austin, Austin.
The University of Houston, Houston.
New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2019 May;2019(165):25-54. doi: 10.1002/cad.20292. Epub 2019 May 2.
The role of executive function (EF) in the reading process, and in those with reading difficulties, remains unclear. As members of the Texas Center for Learning Disabilities, we review multiple perspectives regarding EF in reading and then summarize some of our recent studies of struggling and typical readers in grades 3-5. Study 1a found that a bi-factor structure best represented a comprehensive assessment of EF. Study 1b found that cognitive and behavioral measures of EF related independently to math and reading. Study 1c found that EF related to reading, above and beyond other variables, but Study 1d found no evidence that adding an EF training component improved intervention response. Study 1e found that pretest EF abilities did not relate to intervention response. Neuroimaging studies examined EF-related brain activity during both reading and nonlexical EF tasks. In Study 2a, the EF task evoked control activity, but generated no differences between struggling and typical readers. The reading task, however, had group differences in both EF and reading regions. In Study 2b, EF activity during reading at pretest was related to intervention response. Across studies, EF appears involved in the reading process. There is less evidence for general EF predicting or improving intervention outcomes.
执行功能(EF)在阅读过程中以及在有阅读困难的人群中的作用仍不明确。作为德克萨斯学习障碍中心的成员,我们审视了关于EF在阅读方面的多种观点,然后总结了我们最近对三至五年级阅读困难学生和正常阅读学生的一些研究。研究1a发现,双因素结构最能代表对EF的综合评估。研究1b发现,EF的认知和行为测量与数学和阅读独立相关。研究1c发现,EF与阅读相关,且超出其他变量,但研究1d没有发现证据表明增加EF训练部分能改善干预反应。研究1e发现,预测试的EF能力与干预反应无关。神经影像学研究检查了阅读和非词汇EF任务期间与EF相关的大脑活动。在研究2a中,EF任务引发了控制活动,但在阅读困难学生和正常阅读学生之间没有产生差异。然而,阅读任务在EF和阅读区域都存在组间差异。在研究2b中,预测试时阅读期间的EF活动与干预反应相关。综合各项研究,EF似乎参与了阅读过程。关于一般EF预测或改善干预结果的证据较少。