Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Affiliated Shanghai NO. 10th People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Shanghai, 200072, People's Republic of China; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chizhou People's Hospital, Chizhou, 247000, People's Republic of China.
Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Affiliated Shanghai NO. 10th People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Shanghai, 200072, People's Republic of China; Department of General Surgery, Yancheng Third People's Hospital, Yancheng, 224000, People's Republic of China.
Asian J Surg. 2020 Jan;43(1):110-115. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has been demonstrated safety and effective for patients with gallbladder stones and extrahepatic bile duct stones, however few studies reported its suitability for the treatment of elderly patients. Thus, our study aims to investigate the safety and feasibility of primary closure after LCBDE in the treatment of elderly patients. METHODS: 408 out of 499 patients with Gallbladder stones complicated with choledocholithiasis who were undergone LCBDE and primary closure were divided into two groups: Group A (<65 years old, n = 249) and Group B (≥65 years old, n = 159) and the related clinical data were compared and analyzed by statistical method. RESULTS: Pre-operative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of elderly patients was significantly higher than the younger patients (P < 0.05). In both groups, the positive rate of Choledocholithiasis and bile sludge at exploration, number of stones in CBD, utilization rate of Electro-hydraulic lithotripsy, estimated blood loss, successful duct clearance, the rate of postoperative bile leakage, postoperative bile duct stricture, reoperation, stone recurrence, and other postoperative complications showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). There were also no statistical differences between both groups in time to removal of drainage, postoperative hospital stay, readmission within 30 days and mortality (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It is safe and feasible to treat the elderly patients with common bile duct stones under the premise of strict surgical indications, skilled laparoscopic procedures and accurate endoscopic suture techniques.
目的:腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)已被证明对胆囊结石和肝外胆管结石患者是安全有效的,然而,很少有研究报道其对老年患者的适用性。因此,我们的研究旨在探讨 LCBDE 后行胆总管一期缝合治疗老年患者的安全性和可行性。
方法:对 499 例行 LCBDE 并一期缝合的胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者中,408 例患者被分为两组:A 组(<65 岁,n=249)和 B 组(≥65 岁,n=159),并通过统计学方法比较和分析相关临床资料。
结果:老年患者术前美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分明显高于年轻患者(P<0.05)。在两组中,胆总管探查时胆总管结石和胆泥的阳性率、CBD 内结石数量、电液碎石利用率、估计出血量、胆管通畅率、术后胆漏率、术后胆管狭窄率、再次手术率、结石复发率及其他术后并发症发生率均无显著差异(p>0.05)。两组间引流管拔除时间、术后住院时间、术后 30 天内再入院率和死亡率也无统计学差异(p>0.05)。
结论:在严格的手术指征、熟练的腹腔镜操作和准确的内镜缝合技术前提下,治疗老年胆总管结石是安全可行的。
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019-4-1
Surg Endosc. 2007-12
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2019-7-25
Med Int (Lond). 2021-9-2