Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Department of Oral Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019 Jun;26:334-341. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.04.027. Epub 2019 May 4.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of adjunctive photodynamic therapy (PDT) as compared to scaling and root planing (SRP) alone in the treatment of chronic periodontitis among cigarette smokers.
Electronic databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to January 2019. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with data on comparison between adjunctive PDT compared to SRP in each group were included. Primary outcomes included clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, while secondary outcomes was probing depth (PD) reduction. The weighted mean differences (WMD) of outcomes and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each variable were calculated using random and fixed effect models.
A total of 5 RCTs were included. Two clinical trials were classified as having a low risk of bias and 3 clinical trials as high risk of bias. The overall effect for CAL gain (WMD= -0.088, 95% CI= -0.40 to 0.23, p = 0.58) and PD reduction (WMD= -0.35, 95% CI= -0.87 to -0.17, p = 0.18) was not statistically significant between PDT and SRP groups at follow-up, respectively.
Within the limitations of this study, it remains debatable whether PDT as an adjunct to SRP is more effective in clinical attachment level gain as compared to SRP alone in cigarette smokers given that the available scientific evidence is weak.
本研究旨在评估辅助光动力疗法(PDT)与单独的龈下刮治和根面平整(SRP)相比,在治疗吸烟人群慢性牙周炎方面的临床疗效。
检索了包括 EMBASE、MEDLINE、Cochrane 口腔健康组试验注册库和 Cochrane 中心对照试验注册库在内的电子数据库,检索时间截至 2019 年 1 月。纳入了比较辅助 PDT 与 SRP 组间差异的随机临床试验(RCT)。主要结局包括临床附着水平(CAL)的增加,次要结局是探诊深度(PD)的减少。使用随机和固定效应模型计算每个变量的结局加权均数差值(WMD)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。
共纳入 5 项 RCT。其中 2 项临床试验被归类为低偏倚风险,3 项临床试验为高偏倚风险。CAL 增加的总体效果(WMD=-0.088,95%CI=-0.40 至 0.23,p=0.58)和 PD 减少的总体效果(WMD=-0.35,95%CI=-0.87 至-0.17,p=0.18)在随访时,PDT 组和 SRP 组之间无统计学意义。
在本研究的局限性内,PDT 作为 SRP 的辅助手段,与单独使用 SRP 相比,在吸烟人群中增加临床附着水平方面是否更有效,这仍存在争议,因为现有科学证据较弱。