• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

永久性左束支区域起搏治疗房室传导阻滞:可行性、安全性和急性效应。

Permanent left bundle branch area pacing for atrioventricular block: Feasibility, safety, and acute effect.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Department of Echocardiography, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1766-1773. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.04.043. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.04.043
PMID:31048065
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), a new pacing approach, lacks adequate evaluation.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility, safety, and acute effect of permanent LBBAP in patients with atrioventricular block (AVB).

METHODS

A total of 33 AVB patients with indications for ventricular pacing were recruited. Electrocardiograms, pacing parameters, echocardiographic measurements, and complications associated with LBBAP were evaluated perioperatively and at 3-month follow-up. Successful LBBAP was defined as a paced QRS morphology of right bundle branch block pattern in lead V and QRS duration (QRSd) less than 130 ms.

RESULTS

LBBAP was successfully performed in 90.9% (30/33) of patients (mean age: 55.1 ± 18.5 years; 66.7% male). The mean capture threshold was similar during the procedure (0.76 ± 0.26 V at 0.4 ms) and at the 3-month follow-up (0.64 ± 0.20 V at 0.4 ms). The paced QRSd was 112.8 ± 10.9 ms during the procedure and 116.8 ± 10.4 ms at the 3-month follow-up. Baseline left or right bundle branch block was corrected (intrinsic QRSd 153.3 ± 27.8 ms vs paced QRSd 122.2 ± 9.9 ms) with a success rate of 68.7% (11/16). One ventricular septal lead perforation occurred soon after the procedure with characteristics of pacing failure, and lead revision was successful. Cardiac function and left ventricular synchronization by 2-dimensional echocardiographic strain imaging at the 3-month follow-up slightly improved compared with that at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Permanent LBBAP yielded a stable threshold, a narrow QRSd, and preserved left ventricular synchrony with few complications. Our preliminary results indicate that LBBAP holds promise as an attractive physiological pacing strategy for AVB.

摘要

背景

左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)是一种新的起搏方法,其评估不足。

目的

评估房室传导阻滞(AVB)患者行永久性 LBBAP 的可行性、安全性和急性效果。

方法

共纳入 33 例有行心室起搏指征的 AVB 患者。评估围手术期和 3 个月随访时的心电图、起搏参数、超声心动图测量值以及与 LBBAP 相关的并发症。成功的 LBBAP 定义为 V 导联呈右束支传导阻滞图形且 QRS 时限(QRSd)<130 ms 的起搏 QRS 形态。

结果

90.9%(30/33)的患者(平均年龄:55.1±18.5 岁;66.7%为男性)成功进行了 LBBAP。在手术过程中和 3 个月随访时,平均捕获阈值相似(0.4 ms 时分别为 0.76±0.26 V 和 0.64±0.20 V)。手术过程中的起搏 QRSd 为 112.8±10.9 ms,3 个月随访时为 116.8±10.4 ms。术前存在左束支或右束支传导阻滞(固有 QRSd 为 153.3±27.8 ms 与起搏 QRSd 为 122.2±9.9 ms),成功率为 68.7%(11/16)。术后不久发生 1 例心室间隔导联穿孔,表现为起搏失败,经导线修正成功。与基线相比,3 个月随访时的心脏功能和二维超声应变成像评估的左心室同步性略有改善。

结论

永久性 LBBAP 起搏阈值稳定、QRSd 窄、保留左心室同步性,且并发症少。我们的初步结果表明,LBBAP 作为一种有吸引力的生理性起搏策略,有望应用于 AVB。

相似文献

1
Permanent left bundle branch area pacing for atrioventricular block: Feasibility, safety, and acute effect.永久性左束支区域起搏治疗房室传导阻滞:可行性、安全性和急性效应。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1766-1773. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.04.043. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
2
Prospective evaluation of feasibility and electrophysiologic and echocardiographic characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing.前瞻性评估左束支区域起搏的可行性及电生理和超声心动图特征。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1774-1782. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 25.
3
Permanent left bundle branch area pacing improves mitral regurgitation and cardiac function in patients with right bundle branch block.永久性左束支区域起搏改善右束支传导阻滞患者的二尖瓣反流和心功能。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04175-5.
4
Cardiac resynchronization therapy by left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.左束支区域起搏治疗心力衰竭伴左束支传导阻滞患者的心脏再同步治疗。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1783-1790. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
5
ECG patterns of successful permanent left bundle branch area pacing in bradycardia patients with typical bundle branch block.心动过缓伴典型束支阻滞患者中成功的永久性左束支区域起搏的心电图模式。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Aug;43(8):781-790. doi: 10.1111/pace.13982. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
6
Left bundle branch area pacing in patients with baseline narrow, left, or right bundle branch block QRS patterns: insights into electrocardiographic and echocardiographic features.左束支区域起搏在基线呈左束支或右束支阻滞 QRS 图形的患者中的应用:心电图和超声心动图特征的深入了解。
Europace. 2023 Feb 16;25(2):526-535. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac223.
7
Electroanatomical mapping-guided left bundle branch area pacing in patients with structural heart disease and advanced conduction abnormalities.电激动标测指导结构性心脏病伴严重传导异常患者左束支区域起搏。
Europace. 2023 Mar 30;25(3):1068-1076. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac232.
8
Initial Experience, Safety, and Feasibility of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: A Multicenter Prospective Study.左束支区域起搏的初步经验、安全性和可行性:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Dec;6(14):1773-1782. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
9
Comparisons of electrophysiological characteristics, pacing parameters and mid- to long-term effects in right ventricular septal pacing, right ventricular apical pacing and left bundle branch area pacing.右室间隔部起搏、右室心尖部起搏和左束支区域起搏的电生理特征、起搏参数及中远期效果比较。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Sep 19;22(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02855-8.
10
Left bundle branch area pacing in patients with atrioventricular conduction disease: A prospective multicenter study.左束支区域起搏治疗房室传导疾病患者:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Sep;19(9):1484-1490. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.04.033. Epub 2022 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Left ventricular septal pacing combined with left ventricular pacing improves acute electric resynchronization, hemodynamic responses and clinical outcomes: results of SPORT study.左心室间隔起搏联合左心室起搏可改善急性电再同步化、血流动力学反应及临床结局:SPORT研究结果
Europace. 2025 Aug 4;27(8). doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf147.
2
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing With a Stylet-Driven Lead and Conventional Right Ventricular Pacing.带芯导线左束支区域起搏与传统右心室起搏临床结局的比较
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2025 Jun;36(6):1253-1263. doi: 10.1111/jce.16648. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
3
Long-Term Complications Related to Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.
与心脏植入式电子设备相关的长期并发症
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 18;14(6):2058. doi: 10.3390/jcm14062058.
4
A long-term clinical comparative study of left bundle branch pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block.心力衰竭合并完全性左束支传导阻滞患者左束支起搏与双心室起搏的长期临床对比研究
Heart Vessels. 2025 Jan 3. doi: 10.1007/s00380-024-02512-4.
5
Current Advance, Challenges and Future Perspectives of Conduction System Pacing.传导系统起搏的当前进展、挑战及未来展望
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 16;25(12):438. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2512438. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Comparing Left Bundle Branch Area vs Right-Ventricular Septal Pacing in High-Degree Conduction Disease After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Randomized Trial Study Protocol.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后高度传导疾病中左束支区域与右心室间隔起搏的比较:随机试验研究方案
CJC Open. 2024 May 18;6(9):1058-1065. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2024.05.006. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Review of Atrioventricular Node Ablation Combined with Permanent His-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure.心房颤动合并心力衰竭患者房室结消融联合永久性希氏-浦肯野传导系统起搏的综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 5;25(9):312. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2509312. eCollection 2024 Sep.
8
Disorders of cardiac rhythm in China.中国的心律失常疾病
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2024 Jul 28;21(7):703-712. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2024.07.012.
9
Ventricular activation pattern of left ventricular septal pacing in a canine model.犬模型中左心室间隔起搏的心室激动模式
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Apr;68(3):567-577. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01903-x. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
10
Is Conduction System Pacing Going to Be the New Gold Standard for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?传导系统起搏会成为心脏再同步治疗的新金标准吗?
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 24;13(15):4320. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154320.