• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面部表皮囊肿切除中完全手术切除与使用二氧化碳激光微创切除的比较。

Comparison of complete surgical excision and minimally invasive excision using CO2 laser for removal of epidermal cysts on the face.

作者信息

Kim Keun Tae, Sun Hook, Chung Eui Han

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.

出版信息

Arch Craniofac Surg. 2019 Apr;20(2):84-88. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2018.02152. Epub 2019 Apr 20.

DOI:10.7181/acfs.2018.02152
PMID:31048644
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6505433/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Epidermal cysts are benign, slow growing cysts that often develop on the head, neck, chest, and back of adults. The most common method of surgical excision involves the use of a scalpel and often leaves a scar proportional to the size of the cyst. Therefore, minimally invasive techniques are required. Among these techniques, the CO2 laser-based technique is minimally invasive and has lower complication rate, shorter recovery times, and lesser scarring. This paper aimed to compare the results and postoperative complications associated with a CO2 laser-based excision against conventional surgical excision for epidermal cysts.

METHODS

We surveyed 120 patients, aged 16 to 65 years, with epidermal cysts on the face measuring 0.5 to 2.2 cm in diameter. Twelve months later, we compared the scar length, recurrence rate, patient satisfaction, and complications between patients treated with CO2 laser excision versus surgical excision.

RESULTS

The mean scar length (12 months postoperative) after CO2 laser excision was 0.30± 0.15 cm, and that following surgical excision was 1.23± 0.43 cm (p= 0.001). The procedure time (time from incision after local anesthesia to the end of repair) was 16.15± 5.96 minutes for CO2 laser excision versus 22.38± 6.05 minutes for surgical excision (p= 0.001). The recurrence rates in the surgical excision group and CO2 laser excision group were 3.3% and 8.3%, respectively; this difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.648).

CONCLUSION

The cosmetic outcome of CO2 laser excision is excellent. For epidermal cysts measuring 2.2 cm or smaller, CO2 laser excision is recommended, especially when aesthetic outcome is considered important.

摘要

背景

表皮样囊肿是良性、生长缓慢的囊肿,常见于成年人的头、颈、胸和背部。最常见的手术切除方法是使用手术刀,术后常留下与囊肿大小成正比的疤痕。因此,需要微创技术。在这些技术中,基于二氧化碳激光的技术具有微创性,并发症发生率较低,恢复时间较短,疤痕较小。本文旨在比较基于二氧化碳激光切除与传统手术切除表皮样囊肿的效果及术后并发症。

方法

我们调查了120例年龄在16至65岁之间、面部有直径0.5至2.2厘米表皮样囊肿的患者。12个月后,我们比较了接受二氧化碳激光切除与手术切除的患者之间的疤痕长度、复发率、患者满意度和并发症情况。

结果

二氧化碳激光切除术后(术后12个月)的平均疤痕长度为0.30±0.15厘米,手术切除后的平均疤痕长度为1.23±0.43厘米(p = 0.001)。二氧化碳激光切除的手术时间(从局部麻醉后切开至修复结束的时间)为16.15±5.96分钟,手术切除为22.38±6.05分钟(p = 0.001)。手术切除组和二氧化碳激光切除组的复发率分别为3.3%和8.3%;差异无统计学意义(p = 0.648)。

结论

二氧化碳激光切除的美容效果极佳。对于直径2.2厘米或更小的表皮样囊肿,建议采用二氧化碳激光切除,尤其是当美学效果被认为很重要时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a873/6505433/5af0744d902c/acfs-2018-02152f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a873/6505433/bc2d1d8ac3f6/acfs-2018-02152f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a873/6505433/f2e9c0ab5465/acfs-2018-02152f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a873/6505433/5af0744d902c/acfs-2018-02152f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a873/6505433/bc2d1d8ac3f6/acfs-2018-02152f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a873/6505433/f2e9c0ab5465/acfs-2018-02152f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a873/6505433/5af0744d902c/acfs-2018-02152f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of complete surgical excision and minimally invasive excision using CO2 laser for removal of epidermal cysts on the face.面部表皮囊肿切除中完全手术切除与使用二氧化碳激光微创切除的比较。
Arch Craniofac Surg. 2019 Apr;20(2):84-88. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2018.02152. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
2
Efficacy of the combination of minimally invasive CO laser incision with photodynamic therapy for infected epidermoid cysts.微创 CO2 激光切开联合光动力疗法治疗感染性表皮样囊肿的疗效。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2020 Jun;30:101791. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101791. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
3
CO Laser Punch-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery for Sebaceous Cysts.二氧化碳激光打孔辅助微创手术治疗皮脂腺囊肿。
Lasers Surg Med. 2020 Oct;52(8):743-746. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23216. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
4
Minimally Invasive Excision of Epidermal Cysts through a Small Hole Made by a CO2 Laser.通过二氧化碳激光小孔进行表皮囊肿的微创切除
Arch Plast Surg. 2014 Jan;41(1):85-8. doi: 10.5999/aps.2014.41.1.85. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
5
Complication and recurrence rate in laser CO2 versus traditional surgery in the treatment of Bartholin's gland cyst.激光二氧化碳治疗与传统手术治疗巴氏腺囊肿的并发症及复发率
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Aug;294(2):303-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4045-6. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
6
Robot-assisted Sistrunk's operation, total thyroidectomy, and neck dissection via a transaxillary and retroauricular (TARA) approach in papillary carcinoma arising in thyroglossal duct cyst and thyroid gland.经腋后(TARA)入路机器人辅助施行 Sistrunk 手术、甲状腺全切除术和颈淋巴结清扫术治疗甲状舌管囊肿和甲状腺起源的乳头状癌
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4259-61. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2674-y. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
7
Comparison of the surgical outcomes of punch incision and elliptical excision in treating epidermal inclusion cysts: a prospective, randomized study.打孔切口与椭圆形切除治疗表皮样囊肿的手术效果比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Dermatol Surg. 2006 Apr;32(4):520-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32105.x.
8
Epidermoid cyst removal with CO laser fenestration: A retrospective cohort study.CO 激光开窗术切除表皮样囊肿:回顾性队列研究。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Jun;20(6):1709-1713. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13766. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
9
Removal of keratinous and pilar cysts with the punch incision technique: analysis of surgical outcomes.采用打孔切开技术切除角质囊肿和毛发囊肿:手术结果分析
Dermatol Surg. 2002 Aug;28(8):673-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.02020.x.
10
Treatment of epidermal cysts with erbium: YAG laser fenestration: an alternative to surgical intervention.铒激光开窗术治疗表皮样囊肿:手术干预的替代方法
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 May;74 Suppl 2:S89-92. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000463.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment of a naso-orbito-ethmoid fracture using open reduction and suspension sutures: a case report.采用切开复位和悬吊缝合治疗鼻眶筛骨折:1例病例报告
Arch Craniofac Surg. 2022 Dec;23(6):269-273. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2022.00983. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
2
Abdominal giant epidermoid cyst with squamous epithelial heterogeneous proliferation carcinoma in part of the cyst wall: a case report.腹部巨大表皮样囊肿,部分囊壁伴有鳞状上皮异质性增殖癌:一例报告
Transl Cancer Res. 2022 May;11(5):1457-1462. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-1145.
3
Punch Incision with Secondary Healing (PISH) Technique for Benign Facial Lesions: An Institutional Experience in 307 Patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Excision of Epidermal Cysts through a Small Hole Made by a CO2 Laser.通过二氧化碳激光小孔进行表皮囊肿的微创切除
Arch Plast Surg. 2014 Jan;41(1):85-8. doi: 10.5999/aps.2014.41.1.85. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
2
A new method for facial epidermoid cyst removal with minimal incision.一种小切口切除面部表皮样囊肿的新方法。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009 Aug;23(8):887-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03191.x. Epub 2009 May 3.
3
A new procedure for treating a sebaceous cyst: removal of the cyst content with a laser punch and the cyst wall with a minimal postponed excision.
用于良性面部病变的冲孔切口二期愈合(PISH)技术:307例患者的机构经验
Indian J Plast Surg. 2021 Apr;54(2):138-143. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731257. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
一种治疗皮脂腺囊肿的新方法:用激光打孔器清除囊肿内容物,并用最小延迟切除术切除囊肿壁。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009 Jul;33(4):597-9. doi: 10.1007/s00266-009-9331-2. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
4
Removal of keratinous and pilar cysts with the punch incision technique: analysis of surgical outcomes.采用打孔切开技术切除角质囊肿和毛发囊肿:手术结果分析
Dermatol Surg. 2002 Aug;28(8):673-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.02020.x.
5
Minimal excision technique for epidermoid (sebaceous) cysts.表皮样(皮脂腺)囊肿的最小切除技术
Am Fam Physician. 2002 Apr 1;65(7):1409-12, 1417-8, 1420.
6
Treating a sebaceous cyst: an incisional technique.皮脂腺囊肿的治疗:一种切开技术。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2001 Jan-Feb;25(1):52-6. doi: 10.1007/s002660010095.
7
Microincision for removing sebaceous cysts.微小切口切除皮脂腺囊肿。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989 Jul;84(1):173-4. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198907000-00048.