Kada Akiko, Hirakawa Akihiro, Kinoshita Fumie, Kobayashi Yumiko, Hatakeyama Toshihiro, Kobayashi Daisuke, Nishiyama Chika, Iwami Taku
Department of Clinical Research Management, Clinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, 460-0001, Japan.
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8654, Japan.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Jan 4;14:100316. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100316. eCollection 2019 Jun.
In cluster randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for emergency medical services (EMS) system, we encounter the situation that the actual cluster size and ratio of allocated patients between two groups eventually differ from those used for sample size estimation because of the nature of patient enrollment. In such trials, estimations of effect size of test intervention and intra-cluster correlation coefficient (ICC) used for sample size estimation are also difficult. To improve efficient management on clinical cluster RCTs, we need to understand the effect of such inconsistencies of the design parameters on the type I error rate and statistical power of testing.
We planned the trial which evaluated the 1-month favorable neurological survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with or without real-time feedback, debriefing, and retraining system by EMS personnel. Under the conditions that we possibly encountered in this trial, we examined the effect of inconsistencies in the actual ICC, cluster size, and ratio of patient allocation with those expected for sample size estimation on the type I error rate and power, using simulation studies. We further investigated the contribution of incorporating sample size re-estimation, based on the results of interim analysis of the trial, on the power increase.
This simulation study showed that the inconsistencies of cluster size and patient allocation ratio decreased the power by 5-10% in some cases. In addition, the power decreased by 3-4% when the actual ICC was larger than that expected for sample size estimation. Furthermore, the use of a generalized estimating equation method to evaluate the difference in the 1-month favorable neurological survival between two groups caused inflation of type I error rate. Finally, the increase in power by incorporating sample size re-estimation was limited.
We identified remarkable effects of sample size estimation and re-estimations in a cluster RCT for real-time feedback, debriefing, and retraining system of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. The estimation of design parameters for sample size estimation is generally challenging in cluster RCTs for EMS system; therefore, it is important to conduct a trial simulation that assesses the statistical performances under sample sizes based on the various expected values of the design parameters before beginning the trial.
在针对紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统的整群随机对照试验(RCT)中,由于患者入组的性质,我们会遇到实际的整群大小以及两组间分配患者的比例最终与用于样本量估计的数值不同的情况。在这类试验中,用于样本量估计的试验干预效应大小和组内相关系数(ICC)的估计也很困难。为了改善临床整群随机对照试验的有效管理,我们需要了解设计参数的这种不一致对检验的I型错误率和统计效能的影响。
我们计划了一项试验,评估有或没有EMS人员的实时反馈、汇报和再培训系统的院外心脏骤停患者1个月时良好神经功能存活情况。在本试验可能遇到的条件下,我们通过模拟研究,检验了实际ICC、整群大小以及患者分配比例与样本量估计预期值不一致对I型错误率和效能的影响。我们还基于试验的中期分析结果,进一步研究了纳入样本量重新估计对效能增加的贡献。
这项模拟研究表明,整群大小和患者分配比例的不一致在某些情况下会使效能降低5%-10%。此外,当实际ICC大于样本量估计预期值时,效能会降低3%-4%。此外,使用广义估计方程法评估两组间1个月时良好神经功能存活情况差异会导致I型错误率膨胀。最后,纳入样本量重新估计带来的效能增加是有限的。
我们确定了在一项针对院外心脏骤停心肺复苏实时反馈、汇报和再培训系统的整群随机对照试验中,样本量估计和重新估计的显著影响。在EMS系统的整群随机对照试验中,用于样本量估计的设计参数估计通常具有挑战性;因此,在试验开始前进行试验模拟,评估基于设计参数各种预期值的样本量下的统计性能很重要。