Suppr超能文献

评估儿童癌症治疗期间和治疗后的返校在线资源。

Assessment of Online Resources for Returning to School During and After Treatment of Childhood Cancer.

机构信息

Bloomberg Children's Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1800 Orleans St., Baltimore, MD, 21234, USA.

School of Education, Johns Hopkins University, 2800 N Charles St., Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2020 Oct;35(5):876-884. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01537-y.

Abstract

To evaluate current online parent education resources for children returning to school after a cancer diagnosis. Online search was conducted using 3 search engines and terms recommended by affected families. Sites were evaluated by 3 reviewers for understandability and actionability (scored 0-100%) using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Readability was assessed using Flesch-Kincaid (grade K-12) and content comprehensiveness by a clinical expert review for 5 late effect domains (scored 0-100%). A total of 56 unique online resources were evaluated. Mean understandability and actionability scores were 54% (range 17-83) and 36% (range 0-83) respectively. The mean Flesch-Kincaid grade level was 10th grade (mode 12th). Comprehensiveness of domain coverage was 34% (mode 20%). Some high-quality materials for this topic are available, but generally low scores on the PEMAT scales and high reading level estimates on Flesch-Kincaid indicate parents may have difficulty understanding and using the information. The low scores for comprehensiveness of information indicate parents will likely need to access multiple sources for complete information. A table provides the names, website (URL), and scoring for the 24 top-rated sites and can be used to make recommendations to parents with improved confidence in quality.

摘要

评估癌症患儿重返学校后的在线家长教育资源。使用 3 个搜索引擎和受影响家庭推荐的术语进行在线搜索。使用患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT),由 3 位评审员对网站的可理解性和可操作性(评分 0-100%)进行评估。使用 Flesch-Kincaid(K-12 年级)评估可读性,由临床专家对 5 个迟发性效应领域的内容全面性进行评估(评分 0-100%)。共评估了 56 个独特的在线资源。可理解性和可操作性的平均得分分别为 54%(范围 17-83)和 36%(范围 0-83)。平均 Flesch-Kincaid 年级水平为 10 年级(模式为 12 年级)。领域覆盖范围的全面性为 34%(模式为 20%)。针对该主题,有一些高质量的材料,但 PEMAT 量表的得分普遍较低,Flesch-Kincaid 的阅读水平估计较高,这表明家长可能难以理解和使用这些信息。信息全面性得分较低表明,家长可能需要访问多个来源以获取完整信息。一个表格提供了 24 个评分最高的网站的名称、网址和评分,可用于向家长推荐,从而提高对质量的信心。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验