• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于前庭性偏头痛的热门在线资源质量

Quality of Popular Online Resources About Vestibular Migraine.

作者信息

Wei Oren, Krishnan Pavan S, Chen Jenny X, Schoo Wesley W, Carey John P, Schoo Desi P

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA.

Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Richmond Virginia USA.

出版信息

OTO Open. 2024 Jul 15;8(3):e137. doi: 10.1002/oto2.137. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.

DOI:10.1002/oto2.137
PMID:39015736
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11250137/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the readability, understandability, actionability, and accuracy of online resources covering vestibular migraine (VM).

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional descriptive study design.

SETTING

Digital collection of websites appearing on Google search.

METHODS

Google searches were conducted to identify common online resources for VM. We examined readability using the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores, understandability and actionability using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), and accuracy by comparing the website contents to the consensus definition of "probable vestibular migraine."

RESULTS

Eleven of the most popular websites were analyzed. Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level averaged at a 13th-grade level (range: 9th-18th). FRE scores averaged 35.5 (range: 9.1-54.4). No website had a readability grade level at the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality recommended 5th-grade level or an equivalent FRE score of 90 or greater. Understandability scores varied ranging from 49% to 88% (mean 70%). Actionability scores varied more, ranging from 12% to 87% (mean 44%). There was substantial inter-rater agreement for both PEMAT understandability scoring (mean  = 0.76, SD = 0.08) and actionability scoring (mean  = 0.65, SD = 0.08). Three sites included all 3 "probable vestibular migraine" diagnostic criteria as worded in the consensus statement.

CONCLUSION

The quality of online resources for VM is poor overall in terms of readability, actionability, and agreement with diagnostic criteria.

摘要

目的

评估有关前庭性偏头痛(VM)的在线资源的可读性、可理解性、可操作性和准确性。

研究设计

横断面描述性研究设计。

研究地点

谷歌搜索中出现的网站的数字集合。

方法

通过谷歌搜索来确定VM常见的在线资源。我们使用弗莱什易读性(FRE)和弗莱什-金凯德年级水平得分来检查可读性,使用患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)来检查可理解性和可操作性,并通过将网站内容与“可能的前庭性偏头痛”的共识定义进行比较来检查准确性。

结果

分析了11个最受欢迎的网站。弗莱什-金凯德年级水平平均为13年级(范围:9年级至18年级)。FRE得分平均为35.5(范围:9.1至54.4)。没有一个网站的可读性年级水平达到美国医疗保健研究与质量局推荐的5年级水平或等效的FRE得分90分或更高。可理解性得分在49%至88%之间变化(平均70%)。可操作性得分变化更大,在12%至87%之间(平均44%)。对于PEMAT可理解性评分(平均=0.76,标准差=0.08)和可操作性评分(平均=0.65,标准差=0.08),评分者之间存在实质性的一致性。三个网站包含了共识声明中措辞的所有3条“可能的前庭性偏头痛”诊断标准。

结论

VM在线资源的质量在可读性、可操作性以及与诊断标准的一致性方面总体较差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c77/11250137/b97c36c5386c/OTO2-8-e137-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c77/11250137/3328a9d9ecf0/OTO2-8-e137-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c77/11250137/779a4ea79679/OTO2-8-e137-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c77/11250137/34b8dc5bb87c/OTO2-8-e137-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c77/11250137/b97c36c5386c/OTO2-8-e137-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c77/11250137/3328a9d9ecf0/OTO2-8-e137-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c77/11250137/779a4ea79679/OTO2-8-e137-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c77/11250137/34b8dc5bb87c/OTO2-8-e137-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c77/11250137/b97c36c5386c/OTO2-8-e137-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality of Popular Online Resources About Vestibular Migraine.关于前庭性偏头痛的热门在线资源质量
OTO Open. 2024 Jul 15;8(3):e137. doi: 10.1002/oto2.137. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
2
Health literacy in rotator cuff repair: a quantitative assessment of the understandability of online patient education material.肩袖修复中的健康素养:在线患者教育材料可理解性的定量评估
JSES Int. 2023 Jul 17;7(6):2344-2348. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.06.016. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Health Literacy in Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Quantitative Assessment of the Understandability and Readability of Online Patient Education Material.肩关镜手术中的健康素养:对在线患者教育材料的可理解性和可读性的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2024;44(1):151-158.
4
Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.足踝畸形患者的健康素养:在线患者教育材料的可阅读性、可理解性和可操作性的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2021;41(1):61-67.
5
Web-Based Patient Educational Material on Osteosarcoma: Quantitative Assessment of Readability and Understandability.基于网络的骨肉瘤患者教育材料:可读性与可理解性的定量评估
JMIR Cancer. 2022 Mar 24;8(1):e25005. doi: 10.2196/25005.
6
Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Quantitative Assessment of Online Patient Education Resources.全膝关节置换术:在线患者教育资源的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2022;42(2):98-106.
7
Can Patients Read, Understand, and Act on Online Resources for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery?患者能否阅读、理解并依据前交叉韧带手术的在线资源采取行动?
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jul 28;10(7):23259671221089977. doi: 10.1177/23259671221089977. eCollection 2022 Jul.
8
Carpal Tunnel Surgery: Can Patients Read, Understand, and Act on Online Educational Resources?腕管综合征手术:患者能否阅读、理解和运用在线教育资源?
Iowa Orthop J. 2024;44(1):47-58.
9
Assessing and Improving the Effectiveness of Online Patient Education Materials on Essential Vocal Tremor: A Comprehensive Evaluation.评估并提高在线患者教育材料对原发性声音震颤的有效性:一项综合评估。
J Voice. 2024 Mar 15. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.02.021.
10
Consulting Dr. Google: Quality of Online Resources About Tympanostomy Tube Placement.向谷歌医生咨询:关于鼓膜置管术的在线资源质量
Laryngoscope. 2018 Feb;128(2):496-501. doi: 10.1002/lary.26824. Epub 2017 Aug 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Vestibular Migraine: Clinical Aspects and Pathophysiology.前庭性偏头痛:临床特点与病理生理学
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2022 Jun;55(3):531-547. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
2
Vestibular migraine: Diagnostic criteria1.前庭性偏头痛:诊断标准 1.
J Vestib Res. 2022;32(1):1-6. doi: 10.3233/VES-201644.
3
The Quality, Reliability, and Popularity of YouTube Education Videos for Vestibular Rehabilitation: A Cross-sectional Study.YouTube 教育视频在前庭康复中的质量、可靠性和人气:一项横断面研究。
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Sep 1;42(8):e1077-e1083. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003197.
4
Search Trends and Quality of Online Resources Regarding Thyroidectomy.甲状腺切除术相关在线资源的搜索趋势和质量。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jul;165(1):50-58. doi: 10.1177/0194599820969154. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
5
Quality and readability of English-language Internet information for vestibular disorders.关于前庭障碍的英文互联网信息的质量和可读性。
J Vestib Res. 2020;30(2):63-72. doi: 10.3233/VES-200698.
6
The Epidemiology of Vestibular Migraine: A Population-based Survey Study.前庭性偏头痛的流行病学:一项基于人群的调查研究。
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Sep;39(8):1037-1044. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001900.
7
Assessing Readability and Reliability of Online Patient Information Regarding Vestibular Schwannoma.评估关于前庭神经鞘瘤的在线患者信息的可读性和可靠性。
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Dec;38(10):e470-e475. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001565.
8
Consulting Dr. Google: Quality of Online Resources About Tympanostomy Tube Placement.向谷歌医生咨询:关于鼓膜置管术的在线资源质量
Laryngoscope. 2018 Feb;128(2):496-501. doi: 10.1002/lary.26824. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
9
"Dr Google" will see you now - time trends in online searches on headache.“谷歌医生”现在为您服务——头痛在线搜索的时间趋势。
Cephalalgia. 2018 Feb;38(2):407-408. doi: 10.1177/0333102416681572. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
10
Vestibular migraine: the most frequent entity of episodic vertigo.前庭性偏头痛:发作性眩晕最常见的类型。
J Neurol. 2016 Apr;263 Suppl 1:S82-9. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-7905-2. Epub 2016 Apr 15.