Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Department of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Apr 1;8(4):191-194. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.123.
The health sector consistently appears prominently in surveys of perceived corruption, with considerable evidence that this has serious adverse consequences for patients. Yet this issue is far from prominent in the international health policy discourse. We identify five reasons why the health policy community has been reluctant to talk about it. These are the problem of defining corruption, the fact that some corrupt practices are actually ways of making dysfunctional systems work, the serious challenges to researching corruption, concerns that a focus on corruption is a form of victim blaming that ignores larger issues, and a lack of evidence about what works to tackle it. We propose three things that can be done to address this situation. First, seek consensus on the scale and nature of corruption. Second, decide on priorities, taking account the importance of the particular problem and the feasibility of doing something about it. Third, take a holistic view, drawing on a wide range of disciplines.
卫生部门在感知腐败的调查中一直占据突出地位,有大量证据表明,这对患者造成了严重的不利后果。然而,这一问题在国际卫生政策讨论中远未受到重视。我们确定了卫生政策界不愿谈论这一问题的五个原因。这些原因是:腐败的定义问题、某些腐败行为实际上是使机能失调的系统运转的方式、腐败研究的严峻挑战、对关注腐败是一种忽视更大问题的受害者指责的担忧,以及缺乏关于解决腐败问题的有效措施的证据。我们提出了可以采取的三项措施来解决这一情况。首先,就腐败的规模和性质达成共识。其次,根据特定问题的重要性和解决问题的可行性来确定优先事项。最后,采取整体观点,借鉴广泛的学科。