Suppr超能文献

我们如何了解卫生工作者对减少非正规支付措施的偏好?坦桑尼亚开发离散选择实验的混合方法。

How can we elicit health workers' preferences for measures to reduce informal payments? A mixed methods approach to developing a discrete choice experiment in Tanzania.

机构信息

Department of Health System, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania

University of New South Wales Sydney, The George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 7;13(7):e068781. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068781.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

While discrete choice experiments (DCEs) have been used in other fields as a means of eliciting respondent preferences, these remain relatively new in studying corrupt practices in the health sector. This study documents and discusses the process of developing a DCE to inform policy measures aimed at addressing informal payments for healthcare in Tanzania.

DESIGN

A mixed methods design was used to systematically develop attributes for the DCE. It involved five stages: a scoping literature review, qualitative interviews, a workshop with health providers and managers, expert review and a pilot study.

SETTING

Dar es Salaam and Pwani regions in Tanzania.

PARTICIPANTS

Health workers and health managers.

RESULTS

A large number of factors were identified as driving informal payments in Tanzania and thus represent potential areas for policy intervention. Through iterative process involving different methods (qualitative and quantitative) and seeking consensus views by diverse actors, we derived six attributes for a DCE: mode of payment, supervision at the facility level, opportunity for private practice, awareness and monitoring, disciplinary measures against informal payments and incentive payment for staff if a facility has less informal payments. 12 choice sets were generated and piloted with 15 health workers from 9 health facilities. The pilot study revealed that respondents could easily understand the attributes and levels, answered all the choice sets and appeared to be trading between the attributes. The results from the pilot study had expected signs for all attributes.

CONCLUSIONS

We elicited attributes and levels for a DCE to identify the acceptability and preferences of potential policy interventions to address informal payments in Tanzania through a mixed-methods approach. We argue that more attention is needed to the process of defining attributes for the DCE, which needs to be rigorous and transparent in order to derive reliable and policy-relevant findings.

摘要

目的

尽管离散选择实验(DCE)已在其他领域被用作获取受访者偏好的一种手段,但在研究卫生部门的腐败行为方面,它们仍然相对较新。本研究记录并讨论了开发 DCE 的过程,以提供信息来制定旨在解决坦桑尼亚医疗保健领域非正式支付问题的政策措施。

设计

采用混合方法设计系统地为 DCE 开发属性。它涉及五个阶段:范围广泛的文献回顾、定性访谈、卫生提供者和管理者的研讨会、专家审查和试点研究。

地点

坦桑尼亚的达累斯萨拉姆和奔巴地区。

参与者

卫生工作者和卫生管理人员。

结果

确定了许多因素是坦桑尼亚非正式支付的驱动因素,因此代表了政策干预的潜在领域。通过涉及不同方法(定性和定量)的迭代过程,并通过不同行为者寻求共识意见,我们得出了 DCE 的六个属性:支付方式、设施层面的监督、私人执业机会、意识和监测、针对非正式支付的纪律措施以及如果一个设施的非正式支付较少,为员工提供激励性薪酬。生成了 12 个选择集,并在来自 9 个卫生设施的 15 名卫生工作者中进行了试点。试点研究表明,受访者可以轻松理解属性和水平,回答所有选择集,并且似乎在属性之间进行交易。试点研究的结果对于所有属性都有预期的迹象。

结论

我们通过混合方法确定了 DCE 的属性和水平,以确定在坦桑尼亚通过离散选择实验(DCE)识别解决非正式支付问题的潜在政策干预措施的可接受性和偏好。我们认为,需要更加关注 DCE 属性定义的过程,该过程需要严格和透明,以得出可靠且与政策相关的发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d285/10335481/84738c050970/bmjopen-2022-068781f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验