• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

州政府在智力迟钝方面的财政投入。

State government financial effort in mental retardation.

作者信息

Braddock D, Fujiura G

出版信息

Am J Ment Defic. 1987 Mar;91(5):450-9.

PMID:3105318
Abstract

A comparative analysis of the level of financial effort exhibited in the states for financing mental retardation services was presented. States were ranked on a criterion (aggregate personal income) that compensated for differences in each state's financial capacity. During the FYs 1977-1984 period, on a nationwide basis, state governments spent increasingly more of their own funds for community services and increasingly less for institutional operations; however, combined institutional and community services spending was relatively stable. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis on three economic variables was performed: state size, wealth, and degree of federal assistance. All were very poor predictors of community services fiscal effort, implying the presence of more complex determinants of mental retardation spending. Degree of federal assistance was an important, inversely related, predictor of institutional fiscal effort.

摘要

本文对各州为智力障碍服务提供资金所表现出的财政投入水平进行了比较分析。各州根据一项能够弥补各州财政能力差异的标准(个人总收入)进行排名。在1977财年至1984财年期间,从全国范围来看,州政府用于社区服务的自有资金越来越多,而用于机构运营的资金越来越少;然而,机构服务和社区服务的支出总和相对稳定。对三个经济变量进行了分层多元回归分析:州规模、财富和联邦援助程度。所有这些变量对社区服务财政投入的预测能力都很差,这意味着存在更复杂的智力障碍支出决定因素。联邦援助程度是机构财政投入的一个重要的、呈负相关的预测指标。

相似文献

1
State government financial effort in mental retardation.州政府在智力迟钝方面的财政投入。
Am J Ment Defic. 1987 Mar;91(5):450-9.
2
National study of public spending for mental retardation and developmental disabilities.关于智力迟钝和发育障碍公共支出的全国性研究。
Am J Ment Defic. 1987 Sep;92(2):121-50.
3
Politics, public policy, and the development of community mental retardation services in the United States.美国的政治、公共政策与社区智力障碍服务的发展
Am J Ment Retard. 1991 Jan;95(4):369-87.
4
Current and future trends in state-operated mental retardation institutions in the United States.美国国立智障机构的现状与未来趋势
Am J Ment Retard. 1991 Jan;95(4):451-62.
5
Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1982.1982年避孕药具、绝育及堕胎服务的公共资金投入
Fam Plann Perspect. 1984 May-Jun;16(3):128-33.
6
Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994.1994年避孕药具、绝育及堕胎服务的公共资金
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Jul-Aug;28(4):166-73.
7
Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, fiscal year 1992.1992财政年度用于避孕、绝育和堕胎服务的公共资金。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1993 Nov-Dec;25(6):244-51.
8
Federal block grants and state spending: the Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health block grant and state agency behavior.联邦整笔拨款与州政府支出:酒精、药物滥用及心理健康整笔拨款与州政府机构行为
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996 Winter;21(4):753-70.
9
Family planning funding through four federal-state programs, FY 1997.1997财年通过四个联邦-州项目提供的计划生育资金。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Jul-Aug;31(4):176-81.
10
Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1983.1983年避孕药具、绝育和堕胎服务的公共资金
Fam Plann Perspect. 1985 Jan-Feb;17(1):25-30.

引用本文的文献

1
Synthesis of research on the costs of institutional and community-based care.
J Ment Health Adm. 1990 Fall;17(2):171-83. doi: 10.1007/BF02521146.