School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Queensland, Australia.
School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):e263-e272. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.033. Epub 2019 May 1.
Pain is recognised to have both a sensory dimension (intensity) and an affective dimension (unpleasantness). Pain feels like a single unpleasant bodily experience, but investigations of human pain have long considered these two dimensions of pain to be separable and differentially modifiable. The evidence underpinning this separability and differential modifiability is seldom presented. We aimed to fill this gap by evaluating the current evidence base for whether or not the sensory and affective dimensions of pain can be selectively modulated using cognitive manipulations.
A rigorous systematic search, based on a priori search terms and consultation with field experts, yielded 4270 articles. A detailed screening process was based on the following recommendations: (i) evaluation of effectiveness; (ii) examination of methodological rigour, including each study having an a priori intention to cognitively modulate one of the two dimensions of pain; and (iii) sound theoretical reasoning. These were used to ensure that included studies definitively answered the research question.
After in-depth critique of all 12 articles that met the inclusion criteria, we found that there is no compelling evidence that the sensory and affective dimensions of pain can be selectively and intentionally modulated using cognitive manipulations in humans.
We offer potential explanations for this discrepancy between assumptions and evidence and contend that this finding highlights several important questions for the field, from both the research and clinical perspectives.
疼痛被认为具有感觉(强度)和情感(不适)两个维度。疼痛感觉像是一种单一的不愉快的身体体验,但对人类疼痛的研究长期以来一直认为疼痛的这两个维度是可分离的,并且可以有差异地进行调节。支持这种可分离性和可差异调节性的证据很少被提出。我们旨在通过评估使用认知操作是否可以选择性地调节疼痛的感觉和情感维度的当前证据基础来填补这一空白。
根据预先确定的搜索词并咨询领域专家,进行了严格的系统搜索,共产生了 4270 篇文章。详细的筛选过程基于以下建议:(i)评估效果;(ii)检查方法的严谨性,包括每项研究都有预先的意图来认知地调节疼痛的两个维度之一;以及(iii)合理的理论推理。这些被用来确保纳入的研究明确回答了研究问题。
经过对符合纳入标准的 12 篇文章的深入评估,我们发现,没有令人信服的证据表明,在人类中可以使用认知操作选择性和有针对性地调节疼痛的感觉和情感维度。
我们对这一假设与证据之间的差异提出了潜在的解释,并认为这一发现凸显了该领域从研究和临床角度来看的几个重要问题。