Suppr超能文献

疼痛神经生理学问卷的效果如何?心理测量特性的 Rasch 分析。

How good is the neurophysiology of pain questionnaire? A Rasch analysis of psychometric properties.

机构信息

Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

J Pain. 2013 Aug;14(8):818-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 May 4.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) was devised to assess how an individual conceptualizes the biological mechanisms that underpin his or her pain. Despite its widespread use, its psychometric properties have not been comprehensively interrogated. Rasch analysis was undertaken on NPQ data from a convenience sample of 300 spinal pain patients, and test-retest reliability was assessed in a sample of 45 low back pain patients. The NPQ effectively targeted the ability of the sample and had acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability. However, some items functioned erratically for persons of differing abilities or were psychometrically redundant. The NPQ was reanalyzed with 7 questionable items excluded, and superior psychometric properties were observed. These findings suggest that the NPQ could be improved, but future prospective studies including qualitative measures are needed. In summary, the NPQ is a useful tool for assessing a patient's conceptualization of the biological mechanisms that underpin his or her pain and for evaluating the effects of cognitive interventions in clinical practice and research. These findings suggest that it has adequate psychometric properties for use with chronic spinal pain patients.

PERSPECTIVE

Rasch analysis was used to analyze the NPQ. Despite several limitations, these results suggest that it is a useful tool with which to assess a patient's conceptualization of the biological mechanisms that underpin his or her pain and to evaluate the effects of cognitive interventions in clinical practice and research.

摘要

未加标签

疼痛神经生理学问卷(NPQ)旨在评估个体如何概念化支撑其疼痛的生物学机制。尽管它被广泛使用,但它的心理计量学特性尚未得到全面研究。对 300 名脊柱疼痛患者的便利样本的 NPQ 数据进行了 Rasch 分析,并在 45 名腰痛患者的样本中评估了重测信度。NPQ 有效地针对样本的能力,具有可接受的内部一致性和重测信度。然而,一些项目对于不同能力的人来说功能不稳定,或者在心理计量学上是多余的。NPQ 重新分析了 7 个有问题的项目被排除,观察到更好的心理计量学特性。这些发现表明 NPQ 可以改进,但需要未来包括定性措施的前瞻性研究。总之,NPQ 是一种评估患者对支撑其疼痛的生物学机制的概念化的有用工具,可用于评估认知干预在临床实践和研究中的效果。这些发现表明,它具有足够的心理计量学特性,可用于慢性脊柱疼痛患者。

观点

使用 Rasch 分析来分析 NPQ。尽管存在一些局限性,但这些结果表明,它是一种有用的工具,可用于评估患者对支撑其疼痛的生物学机制的概念化,并评估认知干预在临床实践和研究中的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验