Group HIV and Sexual Health, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Health Promot Int. 2020 Apr 1;35(2):301-311. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daz037.
General practitioners (GPs) play a key role in reducing the hidden HIV-epidemic, but many diagnostic opportunities are missed in primary care. This study aimed at informing the development of an HIV-testing intervention for GPs in Flanders (Belgium) using formative research with a participatory approach. Through the active involvement of an advisory board and 16 group discussions with 122 Flemish GPs, GPs' current HIV-testing practices and perceived practical relevance of 2 distinct HIV-testing strategies (i.e. provider-initiated testing of key populations and indicator condition-based testing) were explored in terms of their relevance and feasibility in routine primary care. Self-reported HIV-testing practices revealed that most tests performed were patient-initiated, pretest counseling was rarely done, and post-test counseling was offered mainly for patients with an HIV-diagnosis. GPs reported multiple barriers to provider-initiated HIV-testing, i.e. personal discomfort, fear of offending their patient, limited knowledge of benefits of early HIV-diagnosis, misconceptions about HIV-risks, lack of guidelines and time. Difficulties to identify patient's sexual orientation or ethical concerns were mentioned as barriers for target group-based HIV testing. GPs assessed the current list of 64 indicator conditions as too difficult to integrate in routine care, deeming a reduced list of GP-relevant conditions as more feasible. Combined strategies (i.e. target group- and indicator-based testing) supported by official screening recommendations were perceived as successful strategies for provider-initiated HIV-testing in primary care. This formative research delivered qualitative evidence for the development of an HIV-testing intervention for primary care settings.
家庭医生(GP)在减少隐性艾滋病流行方面发挥着关键作用,但在初级保健中,许多诊断机会都被错过了。本研究旨在通过采用参与式方法的形成性研究,为比利时佛兰德斯(Flanders)的家庭医生开发 HIV 检测干预措施提供信息。通过咨询委员会的积极参与以及与 122 名 Flemish GP 进行的 16 次小组讨论,探讨了当前 HIV 检测实践以及两种不同 HIV 检测策略(即针对关键人群的医生主动检测和基于指征条件的检测)在常规初级保健中的相关性和可行性,这两种策略的实用性。自我报告的 HIV 检测实践表明,大多数检测都是由患者发起的,很少进行检测前咨询,而主要为 HIV 诊断患者提供检测后咨询。家庭医生报告了多种阻碍医生主动进行 HIV 检测的因素,例如个人不适、害怕冒犯患者、对早期 HIV 诊断益处的了解有限、对 HIV 风险的误解、缺乏指南和时间。难以确定患者的性取向或存在伦理问题被认为是基于目标人群进行 HIV 检测的障碍。家庭医生评估了目前的 64 种指征疾病列表,认为将其纳入常规护理过于困难,认为更可行的是将与 GP 相关的条件列表减少。家庭医生认为,在初级保健中,支持医生主动进行 HIV 检测的联合策略(即基于目标人群和指征的检测),结合官方筛查建议,是成功的策略。这项形成性研究为初级保健环境中 HIV 检测干预措施的开发提供了定性证据。