• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在荷兰阿姆斯特丹的初级保健环境中改善提供者启动的 HIV 和其他性传播感染检测:一项多方面的教育干预计划的结果。

Improving provider-initiated testing for HIV and other STI in the primary care setting in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Results from a multifaceted, educational intervention programme.

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Mar 6;18(3):e0282607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282607. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0282607
PMID:36877664
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9987818/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the Netherlands, general practitioners (GPs) play a key role in HIV testing. However, the proportion of people diagnosed with late-stage HIV remains high, and opportunities for earlier diagnosis are being missed. We implemented an educational intervention to improve HIV and STI testing in primary care in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

METHODS

GPs were invited to participate in an educational program between 2015 and 2020, which included repeat sessions using audit and feedback and quality improvement plans. Data on HIV, chlamydia and gonorrhoea testing by GPs were collected from 2011 through 2020. The primary outcome was HIV testing frequency, which was compared between GPs before and after participation using Poisson regression. Secondary outcomes were chlamydia and gonorrhoea testing frequencies, and positive test proportions. Additional analyses stratified by patient sex and age were done.

FINDINGS

GPs after participation performed 7% more HIV tests compared to GPs before participation (adjusted relative ratio [aRR] 1.07, 95%CI 1.04-1.09); there was no change in the proportion HIV positive tests (aRR 0.87, 95%CI 0.63-1.19). HIV testing increased most among patients who were female and ≤19 or 50-64 years old. After participation, HIV testing continued to increase (aRR 1.02 per quarter, 95%CI 1.01-1.02). Chlamydia testing by GPs after participation increased by 6% (aRR 1.06, 95%CI 1.05-1.08), while gonorrhoea testing decreased by 2% (aRR 0.98, 95%CI 0.97-0.99). We observed increases specifically in extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhoea testing.

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention was associated with a modest increase in HIV testing among GPs after participation, while the proportion positive HIV tests remained stable. Our results suggest that the intervention yielded a sustained effect.

摘要

背景

在荷兰,全科医生(GP)在 HIV 检测中发挥着关键作用。然而,被诊断为晚期 HIV 的人数仍然居高不下,错过了早期诊断的机会。我们在荷兰阿姆斯特丹实施了一项教育干预措施,以改善初级保健中的 HIV 和性传播感染(STI)检测。

方法

邀请全科医生参加 2015 年至 2020 年期间的教育计划,该计划包括使用审计和反馈以及质量改进计划的重复课程。收集了 2011 年至 2020 年期间全科医生的 HIV、衣原体和淋病检测数据。主要结果是 HIV 检测频率,使用泊松回归比较参与前后 GP 的 HIV 检测频率。次要结果是衣原体和淋病检测频率以及阳性检测比例。还按患者性别和年龄进行了分层分析。

结果

与参与前相比,参与后的 GP 进行了 7%的 HIV 检测(调整后的相对比率[aRR]1.07,95%CI1.04-1.09);HIV 阳性检测比例没有变化[aRR 0.87,95%CI0.63-1.19]。女性和≤19 岁或 50-64 岁的患者中 HIV 检测增加最多。参与后,HIV 检测继续增加[aRR 每季度增加 1.02,95%CI1.01-1.02]。参与后的 GP 进行的衣原体检测增加了 6%(aRR1.06,95%CI1.05-1.08),而淋病检测减少了 2%(aRR0.98,95%CI0.97-0.99)。我们观察到特定于生殖器外的衣原体和淋病检测增加。

结论

该干预措施与参与后的 GP 中 HIV 检测适度增加有关,而 HIV 阳性检测比例保持稳定。我们的结果表明,该干预措施产生了持续的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116d/9987818/acbfcbd9a4e9/pone.0282607.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116d/9987818/d663f7c0b2f1/pone.0282607.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116d/9987818/8f90285b454a/pone.0282607.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116d/9987818/acbfcbd9a4e9/pone.0282607.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116d/9987818/d663f7c0b2f1/pone.0282607.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116d/9987818/8f90285b454a/pone.0282607.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116d/9987818/acbfcbd9a4e9/pone.0282607.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving provider-initiated testing for HIV and other STI in the primary care setting in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Results from a multifaceted, educational intervention programme.在荷兰阿姆斯特丹的初级保健环境中改善提供者启动的 HIV 和其他性传播感染检测:一项多方面的教育干预计划的结果。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 6;18(3):e0282607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282607. eCollection 2023.
2
Rationale, design and initial results of an educational intervention to improve provider-initiated HIV testing in primary care.在初级保健中实施教育干预以提高医护人员主动进行 HIV 检测的理由、设计和初步结果。
Fam Pract. 2021 Jul 28;38(4):441-447. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa139.
3
Understanding the effect of an educational intervention to optimize HIV testing strategies in primary care in Amsterdam - results of a mixed-methods study.了解教育干预对优化阿姆斯特丹初级保健中 HIV 检测策略的效果 - 一项混合方法研究的结果。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Sep 30;24(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02161-y.
4
Development and evaluation of a blended educational programme for general practitioners' trainers to stimulate proactive HIV testing.为全科医生培训师开发并评估一项混合式教育计划,以促进主动式艾滋病毒检测。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Mar 7;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0723-8.
5
Missed opportunities to offer HIV tests to high-risk groups during general practitioners' STI-related consultations: an observational study.全科医生进行性传播感染相关会诊时,向高危人群提供艾滋病毒检测的机会错失情况:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 21;6(1):e009194. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009194.
6
A comprehensive overview of urogenital, anorectal and oropharyngeal Neisseria gonorrhoeae testing and diagnoses among different STI care providers: a cross-sectional study.不同性传播感染护理提供者对泌尿生殖系统、肛门直肠和口咽部淋病奈瑟菌检测与诊断的综合概述:一项横断面研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 20;17(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2402-0.
7
Pilot implementation of a home-care programme with chlamydia, gonorrhoea, hepatitis B, and syphilis self-sampling in HIV-positive men who have sex with men.在 HIV 阳性的男男性行为者中开展淋病、衣原体、乙型肝炎和梅毒自我采样的家庭护理计划的试点实施。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 4;20(1):925. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05658-4.
8
Young male sex workers are at high risk for sexually transmitted infections, a cross-sectional study from Dutch STI clinics, the Netherlands, 2006-2012.2006年至2012年荷兰性传播感染诊所开展的一项横断面研究表明,年轻男性性工作者面临性传播感染的高风险。
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Feb 4;16:63. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1388-3.
9
Usage of purchased self-tests for HIV and sexually transmitted infections in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: results of population-based and serial cross-sectional studies among the general population and sexual risk groups.荷兰阿姆斯特丹购买的艾滋病毒和性传播感染自检试剂的使用情况:基于人群及一般人群和性风险群体系列横断面研究的结果
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 21;7(9):e016609. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016609.
10
Testing for sexually transmitted infection: who and where? A data linkage study using population and provider data in the Rotterdam area, the Netherlands.性传播感染检测:检测谁和在哪里?一项使用荷兰鹿特丹地区人群和提供者数据进行的数据分析研究。
Fam Pract. 2023 Nov 23;40(4):599-609. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad079.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and missed opportunities in PrEP uptake, use and care among men who have sex with men with recent HIV infection in the Netherlands.荷兰近期感染艾滋病毒的男男性行为者在暴露前预防药物的获取、使用及护理方面存在的障碍与错失的机会
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 6;20(1):e0310621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310621. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Controversies and evidence on Chlamydia testing and treatment in asymptomatic women and men who have sex with men: a narrative review.无症状女性及男男性行为者衣原体检测与治疗的争议及证据:一项叙述性综述
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 14;22(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07171-2.
2
Efficacy of an electronic reminder for HIV screening in primary healthcare based on indicator conditions in Catalonia (Spain).基于西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区指标条件的基层医疗中电子提醒用于HIV筛查的效果
HIV Med. 2022 Sep;23(8):868-879. doi: 10.1111/hiv.13270. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
3
Incident urogenital and anorectal in women: the role of sexual exposure and autoinoculation: a multicentre observational study (FemCure).
女性泌尿生殖和肛肠部位感染:性接触和自身接种的作用:一项多中心观察性研究(FemCure)。
Sex Transm Infect. 2022 Sep;98(6):427-437. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2021-055032. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
4
Who is providing HIV diagnostic testing? Comparing HIV testing by general practitioners and sexual health centres in five regions in the Netherlands, 2011-2018.谁在提供艾滋病毒诊断检测?比较荷兰五个地区的全科医生和性健康中心在 2011-2018 年期间提供的艾滋病毒检测。
Sex Transm Infect. 2022 Jun;98(4):262-268. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2021-055109. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
5
Understanding Reasons for HIV Late Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study Among HIV-Positive Individuals in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.了解艾滋病毒延迟诊断的原因:荷兰阿姆斯特丹艾滋病毒阳性个体的定性研究。
AIDS Behav. 2021 Sep;25(9):2898-2906. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03239-3. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
6
Rationale, design and initial results of an educational intervention to improve provider-initiated HIV testing in primary care.在初级保健中实施教育干预以提高医护人员主动进行 HIV 检测的理由、设计和初步结果。
Fam Pract. 2021 Jul 28;38(4):441-447. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa139.
7
Evaluating the impact of post-trial implementation of RHIVA nurse-led HIV screening on HIV testing, diagnosis and earlier diagnosis in general practice in London, UK.评估在英国伦敦的全科医疗中,由护士主导的RHIVA试验后实施的HIV筛查对HIV检测、诊断及早期诊断的影响。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jan 10;19:100229. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.11.022. eCollection 2020 Feb.
8
Is reaching 90-90-90 enough to end AIDS? Lessons from Amsterdam.达到 90-90-90 目标就能终结艾滋病吗?来自阿姆斯特丹的经验。
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2019 Nov;14(6):455-463. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000586.
9
Identifying key elements to inform HIV-testing interventions for primary care in Belgium.确定关键要素,为比利时初级保健中的 HIV 检测干预措施提供信息。
Health Promot Int. 2020 Apr 1;35(2):301-311. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daz037.
10
Risk of HIV transmission through condomless sex in serodifferent gay couples with the HIV-positive partner taking suppressive antiretroviral therapy (PARTNER): final results of a multicentre, prospective, observational study.在接受抑制性抗逆转录病毒疗法的 HIV 阳性伴侣的血清学不同的男同性恋伴侣中,无保护性行为传播 HIV 的风险(PARTNER):一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究的最终结果。
Lancet. 2019 Jun 15;393(10189):2428-2438. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30418-0. Epub 2019 May 2.