Palmberger Monika
University of Vienna, Austria; University of Leuven, Belgium.
Int J Comp Sociol. 2019 Feb;60(1-2):74-90. doi: 10.1177/0020715219832918. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
Many of Vienna's labor migrants who entered Austria as so-called "guest workers" together with their spouses long nurtured the dream of returning to their country of origin, at the latest when they retired. By then, however, returning became less than straightforward leading to ambivalence regarding questions of belonging/return and transnational mobility and late-life care. Based on rich qualitative data, in this article, I show that ambivalences are found in the complexity of migrants' narratives, particularly in the way they (1) reassess past choices, (2) negotiate feelings of belonging, and (3) assess future options for late life and care. I argue that the social dimension of ambivalence, which I term "relational ambivalence," is crucial to understanding the labor migrants' experiences, reflections, and choices. The analysis shows that ambivalence must be understood as a product of relationships rather than solely an individual experience. The concept of relational ambivalence captures these social and discursive dimensions of ambivalence. The article ultimately carves out the particularity of ambivalence in the general context of migration and in the specific context of Vienna's labor migrants, while accepting feelings of ambivalence or the simultaneity of different, opposing positions in one and the same person as a core human experience.
许多作为所谓“客工”进入奥地利的维也纳劳工移民,连同他们的配偶,长期怀揣着回到原籍国的梦想,最晚在退休时回去。然而,到那时,回国变得不那么简单,导致在归属感/回国、跨国流动和晚年照料等问题上产生矛盾心理。基于丰富的定性数据,在本文中,我表明矛盾心理存在于移民叙述的复杂性中,特别是在他们(1)重新评估过去的选择、(2)协商归属感以及(3)评估晚年和照料的未来选择的方式中。我认为矛盾心理的社会维度,我称之为“关系性矛盾心理”,对于理解劳工移民的经历、反思和选择至关重要。分析表明,矛盾心理必须被理解为关系的产物,而不仅仅是个人经历。关系性矛盾心理的概念捕捉到了矛盾心理的这些社会和话语维度。本文最终在移民的一般背景以及维也纳劳工移民的特定背景中,勾勒出矛盾心理的特殊性,同时将矛盾心理的感受或同一个人身上不同、对立立场的同时存在视为一种核心的人类体验。