Palmberger Monika
Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology, University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria.
J Ethn Migr Stud. 2017 Jan 25;43(2):235-249. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2016.1238907. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
This paper focuses on older Turkish labour migrants and their spouses, who mostly came to Vienna as young adults in the 1960s and thereafter. They are now entering retirement age and constitute a significant part of Vienna's older population. I analyse their understandings of transnational ageing, their social ties and feelings of social embeddedness. For those still mobile, active participation in one of Vienna's Turkish cultural/religious/political associations is identified as a particular source of social embeddedness. I argue that these voluntary associations provide an important place for older migrants to strengthen social ties and are relatively easy to access, including in old age. Nevertheless, I demonstrate that older Turkish labour migrants are exposed to several forms of discrimination, some of which are felt especially strongly in old age, including a lack of adequate institutionalised late life care. In the discussion of the paper, I critically revisit the debate on ethnicity as a resource versus ethnicity as a vulnerability factor in old age. I argue that this debate is misleading since it camouflages other central social categories and relations. I conclude by suggesting closer attention be paid to the specific but multiple generational experiences of older labour migrants and their spouses.
本文聚焦于年长的土耳其劳务移民及其配偶,他们大多在20世纪60年代及之后年轻时来到维也纳。他们如今正步入退休年龄,构成了维也纳老年人口的重要组成部分。我分析了他们对跨国老龄化的理解、他们的社会关系以及社会融入感。对于那些仍具流动性的人来说,积极参与维也纳的某个土耳其文化/宗教/政治协会被视为社会融入的一个特殊来源。我认为,这些志愿协会为老年移民提供了一个加强社会关系的重要场所,而且相对容易加入,包括在老年时期。然而,我表明年长的土耳其劳务移民面临多种形式的歧视,其中一些在老年时感受尤为强烈,包括缺乏足够的制度化晚年照料。在本文的讨论中,我批判性地重新审视了关于种族在老年时是一种资源还是一种脆弱因素的争论。我认为这场争论具有误导性,因为它掩盖了其他核心社会类别和关系。我在结论中建议更密切关注年长劳务移民及其配偶具体但多样的代际经历。