Kapelańska-Pręgowska Julia
Chair of Human Rights, Faculty of Law and Administration, Nicolaus Copernicus University Toruń Poland.
Eur J Health Law. 2019 Feb 15;26(1):26-43. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12550407.
On 19 December 2017 the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered a judgment in the Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal case. The judgment may be described as one of the hard cases dealing with a healthcare context, as it aimed to clarify the scope of positive substantive state obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights and the conditions of international responsibility. This article explores the judgment against the wider background of the previous case-law of the Court. It focuses on the question of the classification of healthcare problems into three categories: medical negligence, systemic deficiency, and denial of emergency healthcare, and reflects upon their ratione materiae justiciability before the European Court of Human Rights.
2017年12月19日,欧洲人权法院大法庭对洛佩斯·德索萨·费尔南德斯诉葡萄牙案作出判决。该判决可被视为处理医疗保健背景下疑难案件之一,因为它旨在澄清《欧洲人权公约》规定的国家积极实质性义务的范围以及国际责任的条件。本文结合法院此前判例法这一更广泛背景对该判决进行探讨。它重点关注医疗保健问题分为三类的问题:医疗过失、系统性缺陷和拒绝提供紧急医疗保健,并思考这些问题在欧洲人权法院的属事可受理性。