Suppr超能文献

医疗过失、系统性缺陷还是拒绝提供紧急医疗服务?对欧洲人权法院大法庭2017年12月19日在洛佩斯·德索萨·费尔南德斯诉葡萄牙案中的判决及以往判例法的思考

Medical Negligence, Systemic Deficiency, or Denial of Emergency Healthcare? Reflections on the European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber Judgment in Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal of 19 December 2017 and Previous Case-law.

作者信息

Kapelańska-Pręgowska Julia

机构信息

Chair of Human Rights, Faculty of Law and Administration, Nicolaus Copernicus University Toruń Poland.

出版信息

Eur J Health Law. 2019 Feb 15;26(1):26-43. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12550407.

Abstract

On 19 December 2017 the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered a judgment in the Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal case. The judgment may be described as one of the hard cases dealing with a healthcare context, as it aimed to clarify the scope of positive substantive state obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights and the conditions of international responsibility. This article explores the judgment against the wider background of the previous case-law of the Court. It focuses on the question of the classification of healthcare problems into three categories: medical negligence, systemic deficiency, and denial of emergency healthcare, and reflects upon their ratione materiae justiciability before the European Court of Human Rights.

摘要

2017年12月19日,欧洲人权法院大法庭对洛佩斯·德索萨·费尔南德斯诉葡萄牙案作出判决。该判决可被视为处理医疗保健背景下疑难案件之一,因为它旨在澄清《欧洲人权公约》规定的国家积极实质性义务的范围以及国际责任的条件。本文结合法院此前判例法这一更广泛背景对该判决进行探讨。它重点关注医疗保健问题分为三类的问题:医疗过失、系统性缺陷和拒绝提供紧急医疗保健,并思考这些问题在欧洲人权法院的属事可受理性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验