• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引入成本工具以促进常规产科护理中护理成本对话的潜在影响:来自CONTINUE试点研究的经验教训。

The potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine OB care: Lessons from the CONTINUE pilot study.

作者信息

Fitzpatrick Veronica, Erwin Kim, Rivelli Anne, Shields Maureen, Delfinado Leah, Cabiya Marie, Wennerberg Karen

机构信息

Advocate Aurora Research Institute, Downers Grove, IL, USA.

Advocate Aurora Health; Downers Grove, IL, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

出版信息

PEC Innov. 2023 Feb 15;2:100136. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100136. eCollection 2023 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100136
PMID:37214536
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10194338/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the CONTINUE study is to gather preliminary data on the potential impact of implementing a "Cost Tool" in routine obstetrics (OB) care. It is hypothesized that by providing prenatal patients with an ability to forecast their care plan, they would be better able to anticipate and plan for the costs associated with their prenatal care.

METHODS

Pilot data from interviews and surveys were collected from 71 prenatal patients across three clinics throughout Chicago, IL.

RESULTS

As compared to privately insured prenatal patients, prenatal patients with public insurance reported the most benefit in Cost Tool use. Specifically, that the Cost Tool helped to navigate insurance more effectively (OR 4.49, p=0.0254), see the "Big Picture" and link it to the family budget (OR 4.25, p=0.0099), and make the financial tradeoffs needed to get through pregnancy (OR 5.50, p=0.0305).

CONCLUSION

The CONTINUE study provides preliminary signals of the Cost Tool's potential to help publicly insured prenatal patients better navigate the costs associated with their care plan.

INNOVATIONS

The CONTINUE study contributes valuable preliminary data about the utility of a cost tool in routine OB care, especially as it may benefit low-income prenatal patients navigate prenatal care better.

摘要

目的

CONTINUE研究的目的是收集关于在常规产科护理中实施“成本工具”的潜在影响的初步数据。假设通过为产前患者提供预测其护理计划的能力,他们将能够更好地预测和规划与其产前护理相关的成本。

方法

从伊利诺伊州芝加哥市三家诊所的71名产前患者那里收集了访谈和调查的试点数据。

结果

与私人保险的产前患者相比,公共保险的产前患者报告使用成本工具的受益最大。具体而言,成本工具有助于更有效地处理保险事宜(比值比4.49,p = 0.0254),了解“全局”并将其与家庭预算联系起来(比值比4.25,p = 0.0099),以及做出度过孕期所需的财务权衡(比值比5.50,p = 0.0305)。

结论

CONTINUE研究提供了初步迹象,表明成本工具有可能帮助公共保险的产前患者更好地应对与其护理计划相关的成本。

创新点

CONTINUE研究提供了关于成本工具在常规产科护理中的效用的宝贵初步数据,特别是因为它可能有助于低收入产前患者更好地应对产前护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7059/10194338/3ce8363338d6/gr1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7059/10194338/3ce8363338d6/gr1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7059/10194338/3ce8363338d6/gr1a.jpg

相似文献

1
The potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine OB care: Lessons from the CONTINUE pilot study.引入成本工具以促进常规产科护理中护理成本对话的潜在影响:来自CONTINUE试点研究的经验教训。
PEC Innov. 2023 Feb 15;2:100136. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100136. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
The Benefits of Introducing a Pregnancy Support Tool for Low-Income Women During Routine Obstetrics Care.为低收入女性在常规产科护理中引入妊娠支持工具的好处。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231164545. doi: 10.1177/21501319231164545.
3
Development of a Framework and Tool to Facilitate Cost-of-Care Conversations With Patients During Prenatal Care.制定框架和工具,以促进产前护理期间与患者的医疗成本讨论。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9_Suppl):S62-S69. doi: 10.7326/M18-2207.
4
OB Nest randomized controlled trial: a cost comparison of reduced visit compared to traditional prenatal care.OB 巢随机对照试验:减少就诊次数与传统产前护理的成本比较。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jan 21;21(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03557-3.
5
Routine prenatal care visits by provider specialty in the United States, 2009-2010.2009 - 2010年美国按医疗服务提供者专业划分的常规产前检查就诊情况
NCHS Data Brief. 2014 Mar(145):1-8.
6
Does public insurance provide better financial protection against rising health care costs for families of children with special health care needs?公共保险能否为有特殊医疗需求儿童的家庭提供更好的经济保障,以应对不断上涨的医疗费用?
Med Care. 2008 Oct;46(10):1064-70. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318185cdf2.
7
Obstetrics and gynecology practices and patient insurance type.妇产科实践和患者保险类型。
Womens Health Issues. 2013 May-Jun;23(3):e161-5. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
8
The Tablet-Based, Engagement, Assessment, Support, and Sign-Posting (EASSi) Tool for Facilitating and Structuring Sexual Well-Being Conversations in Routine Prostate Cancer Care: Mixed-Methods Study.用于在常规前列腺癌护理中促进和构建性健康对话的基于平板电脑的参与、评估、支持和引导(EASSi)工具:混合方法研究
JMIR Cancer. 2020 Dec 4;6(2):e20137. doi: 10.2196/20137.
9
Randomized comparison of a reduced-visit prenatal care model enhanced with remote monitoring.随机比较强化远程监测的简化产前护理模式。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):638.e1-638.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.034. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
10
Obstetricians' receptiveness to teen prenatal patients who are Medicaid recipients.产科医生对接受医疗补助的青少年产前患者的接纳程度。
Health Serv Res. 1997 Aug;32(3):265-82.

引用本文的文献

1
The Benefits of Introducing a Pregnancy Support Tool for Low-Income Women During Routine Obstetrics Care.为低收入女性在常规产科护理中引入妊娠支持工具的好处。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231164545. doi: 10.1177/21501319231164545.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of Decision Support Tools to Empower Pregnant Women: Systematic Review.使用决策支持工具赋予孕妇权力:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 14;22(9):e19436. doi: 10.2196/19436.
2
Working toward evidence-based guidelines for cost-of-care conversations between patients and physicians: A systematic review of the literature.为患者与医生之间的医疗成本讨论制定基于证据的指南:文献系统回顾。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Aug;258:113084. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113084. Epub 2020 May 29.
3
Tools to Help Overcome Barriers to Cost-of-Care Conversations.
有助于克服医疗费用沟通障碍的工具。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9_Suppl):S36-S38. doi: 10.7326/M19-0778.
4
Development of a Framework and Tool to Facilitate Cost-of-Care Conversations With Patients During Prenatal Care.制定框架和工具,以促进产前护理期间与患者的医疗成本讨论。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9_Suppl):S62-S69. doi: 10.7326/M18-2207.
5
U.S. Internists' Perspectives on Discussing Cost of Care With Patients: Structured Interviews and a Survey.美国内科医生与患者讨论医疗费用的观点:结构访谈和调查。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9_Suppl):S39-S45. doi: 10.7326/M18-2136.
6
The Impact of Cost Conversations on the Patient-Physician Relationship.成本对话对医患关系的影响。
Health Commun. 2019 Jan;34(1):65-73. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1384428. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
7
A review of cost communication in oncology: Patient attitude, provider acceptance, and outcome assessment.肿瘤学中的成本沟通综述:患者态度、提供者接受度和结果评估。
Cancer. 2017 May 15;123(6):928-939. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30423. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
8
A Touchy Subject: Can Physicians Improve Value by Discussing Costs and Clinical Benefits With Patients?一个敏感话题:医生能否通过与患者讨论成本和临床益处来提高医疗价值?
Oncologist. 2016 Oct;21(10):1157-1160. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0207. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
9
Patient-physician discussions about costs: definitions and impact on cost conversation incidence estimates.患者与医生关于费用的讨论:定义及其对费用对话发生率估计的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Mar 31;16:108. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1353-2.
10
What Strategies Do Physicians and Patients Discuss to Reduce Out-of-Pocket Costs? Analysis of Cost-Saving Strategies in 1,755 Outpatient Clinic Visits.医生和患者会讨论哪些策略来降低自付费用?对1755次门诊就诊中的成本节约策略进行分析。
Med Decis Making. 2016 Oct;36(7):900-10. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15626384. Epub 2016 Jan 19.