Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb;40(1):101-113. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683883. Epub 2019 May 6.
The pharmacology and history of neuromuscular blockade in clinical care are complex, with multiple theoretical and observed potential benefits and potential harms. Past studies raised concern for long-term paresis, but more recent studies have not found evidence for harm, possibly due to changes in background care, neuromuscular blocking agent, and duration of blockade. Current use is highly variable, likely due to limited evidence for efficacy beyond short-term physiologic improvement and lingering concerns for harm. A recently completed large multicenter trial will provide further information on the role of pharmacologic paralysis in acute respiratory distress syndrome.
神经肌肉阻滞在临床治疗中的药理学和历史十分复杂,具有多种理论上和观察到的潜在益处和潜在危害。过去的研究对长期瘫痪表示担忧,但最近的研究没有发现危害的证据,这可能是由于背景治疗、神经肌肉阻滞剂和阻滞持续时间的变化。目前的使用情况差异很大,可能是由于缺乏除短期生理改善以外的疗效证据以及对危害的持续关注。最近完成的一项大型多中心试验将提供关于药理麻痹在急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的作用的进一步信息。