Naziri Qais, Cusson Barry C, Chaudhri Moiuz, Shah Neil V, Sastry Akhilesh
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Portsmouth Regional Hospital, Portsmouth, NH, USA.
J Orthop. 2019 Mar 22;16(4):364-368. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.03.010. eCollection 2019 Jul-Aug.
OBJECTIVE/METHODS: We compared short-term outcomes following 40 traditional, cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to the first 40 cemented robotic-arm assisted TKA (raTKA) and analyzed the learning curve for raTKA.
LOS was longer for traditional TKA compared to raTKA (1.92 vs. 1.27days, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in surgical time between the second 20 raTKA and all traditional TKA cases (81.1 vs. 78.3 mins, p = 0.254). raTKA patients had improved 90-day ROM (+3.8° vs. -8.7°, p < 0.05) but comparable complications rates, Knee Society Scores, and patient-reported outcomes at all timepoints.
Despite comparable outcomes, the learning curve for raTKA appeared to progress rapidly.
目的/方法:我们将40例传统骨水泥型全膝关节置换术(TKA)与前40例骨水泥型机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(raTKA)的短期结果进行了比较,并分析了raTKA的学习曲线。
与raTKA相比,传统TKA的住院时间更长(1.92天对1.27天,p<0.0001)。后20例raTKA与所有传统TKA病例的手术时间无差异(81.1分钟对78.3分钟,p=0.254)。raTKA患者90天的关节活动度有所改善(+3.8°对-8.7°,p<0.05),但在所有时间点的并发症发生率、膝关节协会评分和患者报告的结果相当。
尽管结果相当,但raTKA的学习曲线似乎进展迅速。