Suppr超能文献

老百姓需要元伦理学吗?

Do the folk need a meta-ethics?

机构信息

Department of Philosophy,University of Pittsburgh,Pittsburgh,PA

Department of History and Philosophy of Science, and Center for Philosophy of Science,University of Pittsburgh,Pittsburgh,PA

出版信息

Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Jan;41:e109. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18000146.

Abstract

Stanford argues that cooperators achieve and maintain correlated interaction through the objectification of moral norms. We first challenge the moral/non-moral distinction that frames Stanford's discussion. We then argue that to the extent that norms are objectified (and we hold that they are at most objectified in a very thin sense), it is not for the sake of achieving correlated interaction.

摘要

斯坦福认为,合作者通过将道德规范客观化来实现和维持相关的互动。我们首先质疑了斯坦福讨论中所依据的道德/非道德区分。然后,我们认为,在规范被客观化的程度上(而且我们认为它们最多只是在非常狭义的意义上被客观化),这并不是为了实现相关的互动。

相似文献

1
Do the folk need a meta-ethics?老百姓需要元伦理学吗?
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Jan;41:e109. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18000146.
3
Moral externalisation fails to scale.道德外化无法规模化。
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Jan;41:e100. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18000055.
10
Moral demands truly are externally imposed.道德要求确实是外部强加的。
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Jan;41:e115. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18000201.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验