Sreevastava Deepak K, Verma R N, Verma Ravi
Commandant, 174 Military Hospital, C/O 56 APO, India.
Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune 411040, India.
Med J Armed Forces India. 2019 Apr;75(2):146-151. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
Gastro laryngeal tube (GLT) is a newly introduced device. It is an advanced purpose specific design (essentially a modified laryngeal tube) which especially provides a separate wide channel specifically designed for the introduction of a gastroscope for endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP), simultaneously functioning as a supra-glottic airway device for ventilation.
In a randomized controlled trial on 100 patients undergoing ERCP under GA, GLT was compared with endotracheal tube as an alternative airway device. Device insertion conditions, oxygenation and ventilation parameters were recorded.
GLT was found to be comparable with ETT. Success rate of insertion of GLT was high (92%) and the insertion time of GLT was significantly shorter 42 (20-210) s vs. 206 (176-320) s - median (range). Both the devices were equally effective in normal oxygenation and ventilation. The recovery time was significantly shorter and postoperative complications such as hoarseness and dysphonia were less common in GLT group. Inserting conditions for the duodenoscope were better in GLT group.
In this study, likely to be first of its kind, it is concluded that the GLT is a suitable and better alternative to ETT as it allows adequate ventilation and is associated with faster recovery times and minimal extubation-related complications while enhancing operative conditions for gastroenterologists. Its regular use in patients undergoing ERCP is strongly recommended.
胃喉管(GLT)是一种新引入的设备。它是一种先进的专用设计(本质上是一种改良的喉管),特别提供了一个专门设计的单独宽通道,用于插入胃镜进行内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP),同时作为声门上气道设备用于通气。
在一项对100例接受全身麻醉下行ERCP的患者进行的随机对照试验中,将GLT与气管内导管作为替代气道设备进行比较。记录设备插入条件、氧合和通气参数。
发现GLT与气管内导管相当。GLT的插入成功率高(92%),GLT的插入时间明显较短,中位数(范围)为42(20 - 210)秒,而气管内导管为206(176 - 320)秒。两种设备在正常氧合和通气方面同样有效。GLT组的恢复时间明显较短,术后并发症如声音嘶哑和发音困难较少见。GLT组十二指肠镜的插入条件更好。
在这项可能是同类研究中的首例研究中,得出结论:GLT是气管内导管的一种合适且更好的替代品,因为它能提供足够的通气,恢复时间更快,拔管相关并发症最少,同时改善了胃肠病学家的手术条件。强烈建议在接受ERCP的患者中常规使用。