Antunes Vanio L J, Correa Tulio L, Manoj Matthew Antony, Fernandes Matheus Vanzin, de Mesquita Cynthia Florêncio, Martins Otávio Cosendey, Milioli Natalia Junkes, Baraldo Stefano, Amaral Sara, Pereira-Lima Julio
Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2025;18(1):32-38. doi: 10.22037/ghfbb.v18i1.3044.
To compare the efficacy and safety of supraglottic airway (SGA) vs. infraglottic airway (IGA) in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
To optimize patient outcomes by improving airway control, various airway techniques have been employed for sedation during ERCP. However, there is uncertainty about the noninferiority of SGA devices compared to IGA.
We performed a systematic review in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, searching for randomized and non-randomized studies comparing SGA vs. IGA in patients undergoing ERCP and reporting at least one of the outcomes of interest. The primary outcomes were procedure time, incidence of hypoxia, and blood staining events. Statistical analyses were performed using R language 4.3.1. Odds ratio (OR) was used for binary outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with their respective 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I² statistics.
The study comprised 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 3 observational studies involving 280 patients. Among them, 160 were allocated to the SGA group and 120 to the IGA group. When comparing procedure times, there was no statistically significant difference between SGA and IGA (MD -1.51 minutes; 95% CI -6.10 to 3.09 minutes; p = 0.52; I² = 62%). Regarding blood staining, statistical significance favored IGA over SGA (OR 2.67; 95% CI 1.12 to 6.41, p = 0.027; I² = 0%).
No statistically significant difference in procedure time was observed between SGA and IGA. However, IGA exhibited a favorable outcome regarding reduced blood staining compared to SGA. Further studies comparing similar outcomes are necessary to assess such associations better.
比较声门上气道(SGA)与声门下气道(IGA)在接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)患者中的疗效和安全性。
为通过改善气道控制优化患者预后,在ERCP镇静期间采用了多种气道技术。然而,与IGA相比,SGA装置的非劣效性尚不确定。
我们在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库中进行了系统评价,检索比较接受ERCP患者中SGA与IGA的随机和非随机研究,并报告至少一项感兴趣的结局。主要结局为操作时间、低氧发生率和血染事件。使用R语言4.3.1进行统计分析。二分类结局采用比值比(OR),连续结局采用均数差值(MD)及其各自的95%置信区间(CI)。使用Cochrane Q检验和I²统计量评估异质性。
该研究包括1项随机对照试验(RCT)和3项观察性研究,共280例患者。其中,160例分配至SGA组,120例分配至IGA组。比较操作时间时,SGA与IGA之间无统计学显著差异(MD -1.51分钟;95% CI -6.10至3.09分钟;p = 0.52;I² = 62%)。关于血染,统计学上IGA优于SGA(OR 2.67;95% CI 1.12至6.41,p = 0.027;I² = 0%)。
SGA与IGA在操作时间上无统计学显著差异。然而,与SGA相比,IGA在减少血染方面显示出良好结局。需要进一步比较类似结局的研究以更好地评估此类关联。