• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

未来的教训:通过英国的地方视角反思儿童死亡概述小组审查。

Lessons for the future: Reflections on a review of child death overview panels through a local lens in the United Kingdom.

机构信息

University of Northern British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.

University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

J Child Health Care. 2020 Jun;24(2):274-296. doi: 10.1177/1367493519844101. Epub 2019 May 8.

DOI:10.1177/1367493519844101
PMID:31067977
Abstract

Child death overview panels (CDOPs) were set up in the United Kingdom following the confidential enquiry into maternal and child health. Their scope is to identify learning points and modifiable factors that focus on improving services and prevent further deaths. In the light of UK national review and subsequent legislative changes to local safeguarding arrangements, we wanted to share the lessons learnt from our local network study during this time of transition. At times of system change, organizational memory can be eroded, which results in lost opportunities to further strengthen multi-agency working in practice. Overall, our local study highlighted key learning points which could be of use in emergent safeguarding partnerships. Professionals need to continue to actively pursue and create opportunities to collect and collate comprehensive data and promote collaborative multi-agency arrangements. Panels need to be responsive to all partners involved in the safeguarding process, which includes parents. A level of reciprocity needs to be nurtured for safeguarding panel members and acute care providers to work in ways which promote learning, consider emotional support systems and explore ways to define and mobilize knowledge that can inform the safeguarding process and prevent future avoidable child deaths.

摘要

儿童死亡概述小组(CDOP)在英国母婴健康机密调查后成立。其范围是确定学习要点和可修改因素,重点是改善服务并防止进一步死亡。鉴于英国国家审查以及随后对当地保护安排的立法改革,我们希望在这个过渡时期分享我们当地网络研究中获得的经验教训。在系统变革时期,组织记忆可能会被削弱,从而错失进一步加强多机构合作的机会。总的来说,我们的本地研究强调了在紧急保护伙伴关系中可能有用的关键学习要点。专业人员需要继续积极寻求和创造机会,收集和整理全面的数据,并促进协作的多机构安排。小组需要对参与保护过程的所有合作伙伴(包括父母)做出回应。需要培养互惠互利的关系,以使保护小组成员和急症护理提供者以促进学习、考虑情感支持系统以及探索定义和调动知识的方式开展工作,这些知识可以为保护过程提供信息并防止未来可避免的儿童死亡。

相似文献

1
Lessons for the future: Reflections on a review of child death overview panels through a local lens in the United Kingdom.未来的教训:通过英国的地方视角反思儿童死亡概述小组审查。
J Child Health Care. 2020 Jun;24(2):274-296. doi: 10.1177/1367493519844101. Epub 2019 May 8.
2
Child deaths: confidential enquiry into the role and quality of UK primary care.儿童死亡:英国初级保健角色和质量的机密调查。
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Nov;59(568):819-24. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X472520. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
5
Parental Perspectives家长观点
6
Improving the practice of child death overview panels: a paediatric perspective.提高儿童死亡概述小组的实践:儿科视角。
Arch Dis Child. 2014 Mar;99(3):193-6. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305085. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
7
Learning from deaths: Parents' Active Role and ENgagement in The review of their Stillbirth/perinatal death (the PARENTS 1 study).从死亡中学习:父母在回顾其死产/围产儿死亡中的积极作用和参与(PARENTS 1 研究)。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Oct 2;17(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1509-z.
8
Training on domestic violence and child safeguarding in general practice: a mixed method evaluation of a pilot intervention.全科医疗中家庭暴力与儿童保护培训:一项试点干预措施的混合方法评估
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Mar 4;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0603-7.
9
Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers.在孩子被诊断为残疾前后满足家长的需求:对一项由关键工作者提供信息、支持和联络的新项目的评估。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):e477-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0240.
10
Why children die: avoidable factors associated with child deaths.儿童死亡原因:与儿童死亡相关的可避免因素。
Arch Dis Child. 2011 Oct;96(10):927-31. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.177071. Epub 2010 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Child death review: understanding variations in practice using normalisation process theory.儿童死亡审查:运用规范化过程理论理解实践中的差异
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 May 27;9(1):e003432. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003432.