Centre for Academic Women's Health, University of Bristol, Chilterns, Women's Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Oct 2;17(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1509-z.
Following a perinatal death, a formal standardised multi-disciplinary review should take place, to learn from the death of a baby and facilitate improvements in future care. It has been recommended that bereaved parents should be offered the opportunity to give feedback on the care they have received and integrate this feedback into the perinatal mortality review process. However, the MBRRACE-UK Perinatal Confidential Enquiry (2015) found that only one in 20 cases parental concerns were included in the review. Although guidance suggests parental opinion should be sought, little evidence exists on how this may be incorporated into the perinatal mortality review process. The purpose of the PARENTS study was to investigate bereaved parents' views on involvement in the perinatal mortality review process.
A semi-structured focus group of 11 bereaved parents was conducted in South West England. A purposive sampling technique was utilised to recruit a diverse sample of women and their partners who had experienced a perinatal death more than 6 months prior to the study. A six-stage thematic analysis was followed to explore parental perceptions and expectations of the perinatal mortality review process.
Four over-arching themes emerged from the analysis: transparency; flexibility combined with specificity; inclusivity; and a positive approach. It was evident that the majority of parents were supportive of their involvement in the perinatal mortality review process and they wanted to know the outcome of the meeting. It emerged that an individualised approach should be taken to allow flexibility on when and how they could contribute to the process. The emotional aspects of care should be considered as well as the clinical care. Parents identified that the whole care pathway should be examined during the review including antenatal, postnatal, and neonatal and community based care. They agreed that there should be an opportunity for parents to give feedback on both good and poor aspects of their care.
Parents were unaware that a review of their baby's death took place in the hospital. Parental involvement in the perinatal mortality review process would promote an open culture in the healthcare system and learning from adverse events including deaths. Further research should focus on designing and evaluating a perinatal mortality review process where parental feedback will be integral.
围产期死亡后,应进行正式的标准化多学科审查,以从婴儿死亡中吸取教训,并促进未来护理的改进。建议应给予悲痛欲绝的父母机会,对他们所接受的护理提出反馈意见,并将此反馈纳入围产儿死亡审查过程。但是,MBRRACE-UK 围产期机密调查(2015 年)发现,只有十分之一的案例将父母的担忧纳入审查。尽管有指导意见建议征求父母的意见,但几乎没有证据表明如何将其纳入围产儿死亡审查过程。PARENTS 研究的目的是调查悲痛欲绝的父母对参与围产儿死亡审查过程的看法。
在英格兰西南部进行了一次由 11 名悲痛欲绝的父母参加的半结构式焦点小组。采用目的性抽样技术招募了一组在研究之前超过 6 个月经历围产期死亡的不同女性及其伴侣的多样化样本。采用六阶段主题分析方法来探讨父母对围产儿死亡审查过程的看法和期望。
分析得出了四个总体主题:透明度;灵活性与特异性相结合;包容性;以及积极的态度。显然,大多数父母都支持他们参与围产儿死亡审查过程,并希望了解会议的结果。显然,应该采取个性化的方法,允许他们在何时以及如何为该过程做出贡献方面具有灵活性。应考虑护理的情感方面以及临床护理。父母确定,应在审查过程中检查整个护理途径,包括产前,产后,新生儿和社区护理。他们同意,应该有机会让父母对其护理的好坏方面提供反馈。
父母不知道医院对他们孩子的死亡进行了审查。父母参与围产儿死亡审查过程将促进医疗保健系统中的开放文化,并从不良事件(包括死亡)中学习。进一步的研究应集中在设计和评估围产儿死亡审查过程上,其中父母的反馈将是必不可少的。