Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University.
College of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University.
Psychol Aging. 2019 May;34(3):457-466. doi: 10.1037/pag0000350.
The majority of research focused on activity engagement and cognition in older adulthood uses frequency of engagement as the primary metric. Another option is the variety of activities. Carlson et al. (2012) found evidence that a greater variety of activity was protective against cognitive impairment over and above weighted frequency of engagement, suggesting that there may be something unique about activity diversity. The present study compared variety and frequency of activity estimated across 2 different time frames regarding their association with cognitive performance. Community-dwelling participants 60-91 years of age (M = 70.36; n = 199) reported their participation in 57 activities over the past 2 years and logged their daily activities for 1 week. Frequency and variety of activity over 2 years, and across the week were calculated. Structural equation models showed that the frequency indices had a greater number of significant activity factors, and minimally stronger links with the 3 cognitive factors compared to variety of activity. Frequency had stronger associations with cognition for both the 2-year and daily activity estimates, but greater explained variance was only evident when activity was estimated over the past two years. The overall pattern of results was similar for both variety and frequency of activity, highlighting the strong overlap between the 2 indices. Our results support the conclusion that frequency and variety of engagement have similar associations with cognition, and that the most active individuals also have the most diverse engagement. Therefore, a variety index may be sufficient when collecting activity data. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
大多数关注老年人活动参与和认知的研究都将参与频率作为主要指标。另一个选择是活动的多样性。Carlson 等人(2012 年)发现,活动多样性的增加可以预防认知障碍,超过了参与频率的加权,这表明活动多样性可能具有独特性。本研究比较了在两个不同时间框架内估计的活动多样性和频率与认知表现的关系。60-91 岁的社区居住参与者(M=70.36;n=199)报告了他们在过去 2 年内参与的 57 项活动,并记录了他们一周的日常活动。计算了过去 2 年和每周的活动频率和多样性。结构方程模型显示,与活动多样性相比,频率指数与 3 个认知因素的相关性更强,并且具有更多的显著活动因素。与认知的关联在 2 年和日常活动估计中,频率都更强,但只有在过去两年内估计活动时,才会出现更大的解释方差。活动多样性和频率的结果模式总体上相似,突出了这两个指数之间的强重叠。我们的结果支持以下结论:参与的频率和多样性与认知具有相似的关联,最活跃的个体也具有最多样化的参与。因此,在收集活动数据时,多样性指数可能就足够了。(心理学文摘数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。