Centre for Haematology, Department of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
Centre for Haematology, Department of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.
Haematologica. 2019 Dec;104(12):2400-2409. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.200220. Epub 2019 May 9.
There are no validated molecular biomarkers to identify newly-diagnosed individuals with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia likely to respond poorly to imatinib and who might benefit from first-line treatment with a more potent second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Our inability to predict these 'high-risk' individuals reflects the poorly understood heterogeneity of the disease. To investigate the potential of genetic variants in epigenetic modifiers as biomarkers at diagnosis, we used Ion Torrent next-generation sequencing of 71 candidate genes for predicting response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors and probability of disease progression. A total of 124 subjects with newly-diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia began with imatinib (n=62) or second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (n=62) and were classified as responders or non-responders based on the transcript levels within the first year and the European LeukemiaNet criteria for failure. Somatic variants affecting 21 genes (e.g. ) were detected in 30% of subjects, most of whom were non-responders (41% non-responders, 18% responders to imatinib, 38% non-responders, 25% responders to second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors). The presence of variants predicted the rate of achieving a major molecular response, event-free survival, progression-free survival and chronic myeloid leukemia-related survival in the imatinib but not the second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors cohort. Rare germline variants had no prognostic significance irrespective of treatment while some pre-leukemia variants suggest a multi-step development of chronic myeloid leukemia. Our data suggest that identification of somatic variants at diagnosis facilitates stratification into imatinib responders/non-responders, thereby allowing earlier use of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, which, in turn, may overcome the negative impact of such variants on disease progression.
目前尚无经验证的分子生物标志物可用于识别新诊断的慢性期慢性髓性白血病患者,这些患者对伊马替尼反应不佳,可能受益于一线治疗,采用更有效的第二代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂。我们无法预测这些“高危”患者,这反映了疾病异质性尚未被充分了解。为了研究诊断时表观遗传修饰因子遗传变异作为生物标志物的潜力,我们采用 Ion Torrent 下一代测序技术对 71 个候选基因进行检测,以预测对酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的反应和疾病进展的可能性。共有 124 名新诊断的慢性期慢性髓性白血病患者开始接受伊马替尼(n=62)或第二代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(n=62)治疗,并根据第一年的转录水平和欧洲白血病网的失败标准,分为应答者和无应答者。在 30%的患者中检测到影响 21 个基因(如)的体细胞变异,其中大多数为无应答者(41%无应答者,18%伊马替尼应答者,38%无应答者,25%第二代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂应答者)。在伊马替尼组而非第二代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂组中,变异的存在预测了达到主要分子反应、无事件生存、无进展生存和慢性髓性白血病相关生存的速度。无论治疗如何,罕见的种系变异均无预后意义,而一些白血病前变异提示慢性髓性白血病的多步发展。我们的数据表明,在诊断时识别体细胞变异有助于将患者分为伊马替尼应答者和无应答者,从而更早地使用第二代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂,这反过来又可能克服这些变异对疾病进展的负面影响。