• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从年轻时的下颌骨标志数据预测成人面型。

Predicting adult facial type from mandibular landmark data at young ages.

机构信息

Craniofacial Research Instrumentation Lab, Department of Orthodontics, University of Pacific Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, San Francisco, California.

Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.

出版信息

Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019 May;22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):154-162. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12296.

DOI:10.1111/ocr.12296
PMID:31074133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6512854/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the potential of predicting adult facial types at different stages of mandibular development.

SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION

A total of 941 participants from the Bolton-Brush, Denver, Fels, Iowa, Michigan and Oregon growth studies with longitudinal lateral cephalograms (total of 7166) between ages 6-21 years.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Each participant was placed into one of three facial types based on mandibular plane angle (MPA) from cephalograms taken closest to 18 years of age (range of 15-21 years): hypo-divergent (MPA < 28°), normo-divergent (28°≤ MPA ≤ 39°) and hyper-divergent (MPA > 39°). Cephalograms were categorized into 13 age groups 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18-21. Twenty-three two-dimensional anatomical landmarks were digitized on the mandible and superimposed using generalized Procrustes analysis, which projects landmarks into a common shape space. Data were analysed within age categories using stepwise discriminant analysis to identify landmarks that distinguish adult facial types and by jackknife cross-validation to test how well young individuals can be reclassified into their adult facial types.

RESULTS

Although each category has multiple best discriminating landmarks among adult types, three landmarks were common across nearly all age categories: menton, gonion and articulare. Individuals were correctly classified better than chance, even among the youngest age category. Cross-validation rates improved with age, and hyper- and hypo-divergent groups have better reclassification rates than the normo-divergent group.

CONCLUSIONS

The discovery of important indicators of adult facial type in the developing mandible helps improve our capacity to predict adult facial types at a younger age.

摘要

目的

评估在下颌骨发育的不同阶段预测成人面型的潜力。

设置和样本人群

来自博尔顿-布鲁什、丹佛、费尔斯、爱荷华、密歇根和俄勒冈生长研究的共 941 名参与者,这些参与者的纵向侧位头颅侧位片(共 7166 张)拍摄于 6-21 岁之间。

材料和方法

根据最接近 18 岁时拍摄的头颅侧位片上的下颌平面角(MPA),将每个参与者归入三种面型之一(MPA 范围为 15-21 岁):低角型(MPA<28°)、均角型(28°≤MPA≤39°)和高角型(MPA>39°)。头颅侧位片分为 13 个年龄组:6、7、8、9、10、11、12、13、14、15、16、17 和 18-21 岁。在下颌骨上数字化了 23 个二维解剖标志,并使用广义 Procrustes 分析进行叠加,该分析将标志投影到共同的形状空间中。在每个年龄组内使用逐步判别分析来识别区分成人面型的标志,并通过 jackknife 交叉验证来测试年轻个体被重新分类为其成人面型的准确性。

结果

尽管每个类别在成人类型中都有多个最佳区分标志,但有三个标志几乎在所有年龄类别中都是常见的:颏下点、下颌角点和关节点。个体的分类准确率高于随机水平,即使在最年轻的年龄组也是如此。随着年龄的增长,交叉验证率提高,高角型和低角型组的重新分类率高于均角型组。

结论

在下颌骨发育过程中发现成人面型的重要指标有助于提高我们在更年轻时预测成人面型的能力。

相似文献

1
Predicting adult facial type from mandibular landmark data at young ages.从年轻时的下颌骨标志数据预测成人面型。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019 May;22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):154-162. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12296.
2
Geometric morphometric analysis of growth patterns among facial types.基于面型的生长模式的几何形态测量分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Sep;160(3):430-441. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.04.038. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
3
Clinical implications of age-related change of the mandibular plane angle.下颌平面角的年龄相关性变化的临床意义。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020 Feb;23(1):50-58. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12342. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
4
Diagnostic validity of different gonial angle segmentation for the assessment of mandibular growth direction: A retrospective study.不同下颌角分区对评估下颌生长方向的诊断准确性:一项回顾性研究。
Ann Anat. 2022 Jun;242:151912. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2022.151912. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
5
[Preliminary study on the method of automatically determining facial landmarks based on three-dimensional face template].[基于三维人脸模板自动确定面部标志点方法的初步研究]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Apr 9;57(4):358-365. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20210913-00409.
6
Craniofacial growth and morphology among intersecting clinical categories.颅面生长与形态在交叉临床类别中的表现。
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2022 Sep;305(9):2175-2206. doi: 10.1002/ar.24870. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
7
The pattern of facial skeletal growth and its relationship to various common indexes of maturation.面部骨骼生长模式及其与各种常见成熟指标的关系。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jun;143(6):845-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.019.
8
Orthodontic Treatment Effect on Inclination of Maxillary Incisors and Growth Axes in Adult Patients with Various Mandibular Divergent Patterns.不同下颌骨发散型成人患者的正畸治疗对上颌切牙倾斜度和生长轴的影响。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Sep 1;22(9):1008-1013.
9
Transverse growth of the maxilla and mandible in untreated girls with low, average, and high MP-SN angles: a longitudinal study.低、中、高下颌平面角与鼻根点至鼻下点连线夹角的未治疗女孩上颌骨和下颌骨的横向生长:一项纵向研究
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Dec;128(6):716-23; quiz 801. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.028.
10
The study of facial morphology in patients with vertical growth pattern (hyperdivergent) lacking or showing temporomandibular disorders symptoms.垂直生长型(高角型)患者的面型研究(缺乏或表现出颞下颌关节紊乱症状)。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jun;121(3):233-237. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of individualized facial growth prediction models using artificial intelligence and partial least squares based on the Mathews growth collection.基于马修斯生长数据集,对使用人工智能和偏最小二乘法的个性化面部生长预测模型进行比较。
Angle Orthod. 2025 May 1;95(3):249-258. doi: 10.2319/082124-687.1.
2
Cross-sectional data accurately model longitudinal growth in the craniofacial skeleton.横断数据准确地模拟了颅面骨骼的纵向生长。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 7;13(1):19294. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46018-x.
3
Classification of Maxillofacial Morphology by Artificial Intelligence Using Cephalometric Analysis Measurements.利用头影测量分析数据通过人工智能进行颌面形态分类
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 21;13(13):2134. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13132134.
4
Craniofacial growth and morphology among intersecting clinical categories.颅面生长与形态在交叉临床类别中的表现。
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2022 Sep;305(9):2175-2206. doi: 10.1002/ar.24870. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
5
Geometric morphometric analysis of growth patterns among facial types.基于面型的生长模式的几何形态测量分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Sep;160(3):430-441. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.04.038. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
6
Mandibular shape prediction using cephalometric analysis: applications in craniofacial analysis, forensic anthropology and archaeological reconstruction.使用头影测量分析进行下颌骨形状预测:在颅面分析、法医人类学和考古重建中的应用。
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Oct 31;42(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40902-020-00282-3.
7
Bayesian approach to longitudinal craniofacial growth: The Craniofacial Growth Consortium Study.贝叶斯方法在颅面纵向生长中的应用:颅面生长研究联合体研究。
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2021 May;304(5):991-1019. doi: 10.1002/ar.24520. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
8
Clinical implications of age-related change of the mandibular plane angle.下颌平面角的年龄相关性变化的临床意义。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020 Feb;23(1):50-58. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12342. Epub 2019 Oct 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical implications of age-related change of the mandibular plane angle.下颌平面角的年龄相关性变化的临床意义。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020 Feb;23(1):50-58. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12342. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
2
Measuring 3D shape in orthodontics through geometric morphometrics.通过几何形态测量学测量正畸中的 3D 形状。
Prog Orthod. 2017 Dec 1;18(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0194-9.
3
Morphometric covariation between palatal shape and skeletal pattern in Class II growing subjects.II类生长发育期受试者腭部形态与骨骼模式之间的形态计量协变关系。
Eur J Orthod. 2017 Aug 1;39(4):371-376. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx014.
4
Geometric morphometric analysis of craniofacial growth between the ages of 12 and 14 in normal humans.正常人类12至14岁颅面生长的几何形态测量分析。
Eur J Orthod. 2017 Aug 1;39(4):386-394. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjw070.
5
The use of Bjork's indications of growth for evaluation of extremes of skeletal morphology.使用比约克生长指征评估骨骼形态的极端情况。
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Dec;38(6):555-562. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv084. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
6
Development and testing of multilevel models for longitudinal craniofacial growth prediction.用于纵向颅面生长预测的多层次模型的开发与测试
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Jul;128(1):45-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.035.
7
Morphometrics for cephalometric diagnosis.用于头影测量诊断的形态测量学
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 May;125(5):571-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.05.013.
8
Size and shape measurement in contemporary cephalometrics.当代头影测量中的尺寸和形状测量。
Eur J Orthod. 2003 Jun;25(3):231-42. doi: 10.1093/ejo/25.3.231.
9
Morphospatial analysis of soft-tissue profile in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated using twin block appliances: geometric morphometrics.使用双阻板矫治器治疗的安氏II类1分类错牙合患者软组织侧貌的形态空间分析:几何形态测量学
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2002 Feb;5(1):38-50. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2002.01121.x.
10
Thin-plate spline analysis of mandibular growth.下颌生长的薄板样条分析
Angle Orthod. 2001 Apr;71(2):83-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)071<0083:TPSAOM>2.0.CO;2.