• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性对全科医生治疗外阴痛的评价:一项定性研究。

Women's appraisal of the management of vulvodynia by their general practitioner: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Radboud University Medical Centre, Department of Primary and Community Care, Unit Gender & Women's Health, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Department of Sexology and Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2019 Nov 18;36(6):791-796. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz021.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmz021
PMID:31074493
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7006995/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Provoked Vulvodynia (PVD) is the most common cause of vulvar pain. General practitioners (GPs) are insufficiently familiar with it, causing a delay in many women receiving correct diagnosis and treatment. Besides patients factors, this delay can partly be explained by the reluctance of GPs to explore the sexual context of PVD and by their negative emotional reactions such as helplessness and frustration when consulted by patients with medically unexplained symptoms like PVD.

OBJECTIVE

To gain insight into how women with PVD perceive and evaluate condition management by their GP, in order to support GPs in the consultation of women with PVD.

METHODS

We performed face-to-face in-depth interviews with women diagnosed with PVD. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. The Consolidated Criteria for reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ-criteria) were applied.

RESULTS

Analysis of the interviews generated four interrelated themes: Doctor-patient relationship, Lack of knowledge, Referral process and Addressing sexual issues. Empathy of the GP, involvement in decision-making and referral were important factors in the appreciation of the consultation for women with PVD who were referred to a specialist. Because women were reluctant to start a discussion about sexuality, they expected a proactive attitude from their GP. The communication with and the competence of the GP ultimately proved more important in the contact than the gender of the GP.

CONCLUSION

Women with PVD prefer a patient-centred approach and want GPs to acknowledge their autonomy and to address sexuality proactively.

摘要

背景

诱发性外阴痛(PVD)是外阴疼痛最常见的原因。全科医生(GP)对此了解不足,导致许多女性迟迟得不到正确的诊断和治疗。除了患者的因素外,这种延迟在一定程度上可以解释为 GP 不愿探讨 PVD 的性背景,以及当患者出现像 PVD 这样无法用医学解释的症状时,GP 会感到无助和沮丧,从而产生负面的情绪反应。

目的

深入了解患有 PVD 的女性如何看待和评价她们的 GP 对病情的管理,以支持 GP 为患有 PVD 的女性提供咨询服务。

方法

我们对被诊断患有 PVD 的女性进行了面对面的深入访谈。对访谈进行了录音、逐字记录,并进行了主题分析。应用了定性研究报告的统一标准(COREQ 标准)。

结果

对访谈的分析产生了四个相互关联的主题:医患关系、知识缺乏、转诊过程和解决性问题。GP 的同理心、参与决策和转诊是影响接受转诊到专科医生治疗的 PVD 女性对咨询满意度的重要因素。由于女性不愿意开始讨论性问题,她们希望 GP 能主动提出这个话题。女性认为与 GP 的沟通和 GP 的能力比 GP 的性别更重要。

结论

患有 PVD 的女性更喜欢以患者为中心的方法,希望 GP 承认她们的自主权,并主动解决性问题。

相似文献

1
Women's appraisal of the management of vulvodynia by their general practitioner: a qualitative study.女性对全科医生治疗外阴痛的评价:一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2019 Nov 18;36(6):791-796. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz021.
2
Facilitators and barriers in the diagnostic process of vulvovaginal complaints (vulvodynia) in general practice: a qualitative study.妇科疾病中外阴阴道症状(外阴痛)诊断过程中的促进因素和阻碍因素:一项定性研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):92-98. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1420774.
3
Managing barriers to empathy in the clinical encounter: a qualitative interview study with GPs.应对临床诊疗中同理心的障碍:一项针对全科医生的定性访谈研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Dec;66(653):e887-e895. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X687565. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
4
Empathy in general practice-the gap between wishes and reality: comparing the views of patients and physicians.全科医疗中的同理心——愿望与现实之间的差距:比较患者与医生的观点
Fam Pract. 2018 Mar 27;35(2):203-208. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx080.
5
Empathy: what does it mean for GPs? A qualitative study.同理心:对全科医生而言意味着什么?一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2015 Feb;32(1):94-100. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmu080. Epub 2014 Nov 30.
6
The Relationship Between Vulvovaginal Candidiasis and Provoked Vulvodynia: A Systematic Review.外阴阴道假丝酵母菌病与诱发性外阴痛的关系:系统评价。
J Sex Med. 2018 Sep;15(9):1310-1321. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.07.011. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
7
Sexual and relationship intimacy among women with provoked vestibulodynia and their partners: associations with sexual satisfaction, sexual function, and pain self-efficacy.患有激发性前庭疼痛的女性及其伴侣之间的性与关系亲密度:与性满意度、性功能及疼痛自我效能感的关联
J Sex Med. 2013 Aug;10(8):2024-35. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12210. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
8
From silence to sensitivity: a new Identity Disclosure model to facilitate disclosure for same-sex attracted women in general practice consultations.从沉默到敏感:一种新的身份披露模型,以促进一般实践咨询中对同性恋女性的披露。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jul;75(1):208-16. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.037. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
9
Provoked vestibulodynia-women's experience of participating in a multidisciplinary vulvodynia program.诱发性阴道前庭疼痛-女性参与多学科外阴疼痛计划的体验。
J Sex Med. 2012 Apr;9(4):1086-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02641.x. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
10
Improving GP communication in consultations on medically unexplained symptoms: a qualitative interview study with patients in primary care.改善全科医生在对无法解释的医学症状进行咨询时的沟通:一项对初级保健患者的定性访谈研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Oct;67(663):e716-e723. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X692537. Epub 2017 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of vulvodynia research: Diagnosis, treatment, and care experiences.外阴痛研究的范围综述:诊断、治疗及护理体验
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251345946. doi: 10.1177/17455057251345946. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
2
Understanding Patient Experiences of Vulvodynia Through Reddit: Qualitative Analysis.通过Reddit了解外阴痛患者的经历:定性分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Mar 6;5:e63072. doi: 10.2196/63072.
3
The Vulvodynia Primary Care Toolkit: results of a mixed-method evaluation with community-based family physicians in British Columbia.外阴痛初级保健工具包:与不列颠哥伦比亚省社区家庭医生进行的混合方法评估结果
Fam Pract. 2025 Jan 17;42(1). doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaf002.
4
A mixed methods systematic literature review of barriers and facilitators to help-seeking among women with stigmatised pelvic health symptoms.混合方法系统文献综述:有污名化盆腔健康症状的女性寻求帮助的障碍和促进因素。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Apr 3;24(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03063-6.
5
Yonder: Earache, personality disorder, pain scores, and vulvodynia.那边:耳痛、人格障碍、疼痛评分和外阴痛。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Aug 29;69(686):444. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X705281. Print 2019 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Is uncertain vulvovaginal candidiasis a marker of vulvodynia? A study in a Dutch general practice research database.不明原因的外阴阴道念珠菌病是外阴痛的一个标志吗?一项基于荷兰全科医疗研究数据库的研究。
BJGP Open. 2017 May 31;1(2):bjgpopen17X100905. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen17X100905.
2
The Relationship Between Vulvovaginal Candidiasis and Provoked Vulvodynia: A Systematic Review.外阴阴道假丝酵母菌病与诱发性外阴痛的关系:系统评价。
J Sex Med. 2018 Sep;15(9):1310-1321. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.07.011. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
3
Effects of empathic and positive communication in healthcare consultations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.共情和积极沟通在医疗保健咨询中的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J R Soc Med. 2018 Jul;111(7):240-252. doi: 10.1177/0141076818769477. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
4
Facilitators and barriers in the diagnostic process of vulvovaginal complaints (vulvodynia) in general practice: a qualitative study.妇科疾病中外阴阴道症状(外阴痛)诊断过程中的促进因素和阻碍因素:一项定性研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):92-98. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1420774.
5
Empathy in general practice-the gap between wishes and reality: comparing the views of patients and physicians.全科医疗中的同理心——愿望与现实之间的差距:比较患者与医生的观点
Fam Pract. 2018 Mar 27;35(2):203-208. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx080.
6
Improving GP communication in consultations on medically unexplained symptoms: a qualitative interview study with patients in primary care.改善全科医生在对无法解释的医学症状进行咨询时的沟通:一项对初级保健患者的定性访谈研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Oct;67(663):e716-e723. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X692537. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
7
'Treated as a number, not treated as a person': a qualitative exploration of the perceived barriers to effective pain management of patients with chronic pain.“被当作数字,而非当作人来对待”:对慢性疼痛患者有效疼痛管理中感知到的障碍的质性探索
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 12;7(6):e016454. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016454.
8
Medically unexplained symptoms: the person, the symptoms and the dialogue.医学上无法解释的症状:患者、症状与对话
Fam Pract. 2017 Apr 1;34(2):245-251. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw132.
9
Consequences of the presence and absence of empathy during consultations in primary care: A focus group study with patients.基层医疗咨询中同理心存在与缺失的后果:一项针对患者的焦点小组研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 May;100(5):987-993. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
10
Patient-provider communication about sexual concerns in cancer: a systematic review.癌症患者与医护人员就性问题进行的沟通:一项系统综述。
J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Apr;11(2):175-188. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0577-9. Epub 2016 Nov 17.