Suppr超能文献

双腔刺激的临床研究。关于50例随访1至5年的病例

[Clinical study of double-chamber stimulation. Apropos of 50 cases followed-up for 1 to 5 years].

作者信息

Barnay C, Coste A, Bénichou J, Medvedowsky J L

出版信息

Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1987 Feb;80(2):144-51.

PMID:3107500
Abstract

The authors report their experience of dual chamber pacing in 29 men and 21 women of mean age 71 +/- 4 years. 35 had sinus node dysfunction associated with node-His bundle conduction disorders; 31 presented with neurological symptoms and 4 with heart failure (due to pacemaker syndrome in 1 case). Sinus node dysfunction was diagnosed by surface ECG in 25 cases and after electrophysiological studied in only 10 cases. Fifteen patients had atrioventricular block without sinus node dysfunction: 2 of them were young subjects, 1 had pacemaker syndrome and 12 were actual or potential heart failure patients for whom preservation of the atrial systole was justified. Nine patients presented with neurological symptoms. 43 (86%) had cardiac or arterial disease associated with cardiac rhythm and conduction disorders. The percutaneous single subclavian vein approach was used in 36 cases (78%). 41 active and 9 passive fixation electrodes were utilized. The mean follow-up period was 25 months (12 to 70 months), with a cumulative figure of 1,253 months/patients. Two late re-operations for displacement of the atrial electrode were performed. Dual chamber pacing was abandoned, 14 months on average after implantation, in 9 patients (18%), on account of arrhythmias in 4 of them. Three cases of tachycardia from "electronic re-entry" and 6 cases of supraventricular arrhythmia transferred to the ventricle by the pacemaker were observed. Sixteen patients (32%) died 12 +/- 4 months on average after surgery: 12 (33%) had sinus node dysfunction and 4 (26%) had AV block. Death was caused by a cardiovascular disease in 12 cases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

作者报告了他们对平均年龄为71±4岁的29名男性和21名女性进行双腔起搏的经验。35例患有与窦房结-希氏束传导障碍相关的窦房结功能障碍;31例有神经症状,4例有心力衰竭(1例因起搏器综合征)。25例通过体表心电图诊断为窦房结功能障碍,仅10例经电生理研究确诊。15例患者有房室传导阻滞但无窦房结功能障碍:其中2例为年轻患者,1例有起搏器综合征,12例为实际或潜在心力衰竭患者,保留心房收缩对其有益。9例患者有神经症状。43例(86%)患有与心律和传导障碍相关的心脏或动脉疾病。36例(78%)采用经皮单根锁骨下静脉途径。使用了41根主动固定电极和9根被动固定电极。平均随访期为25个月(12至70个月),累计随访时间为1253个月/患者。因心房电极移位进行了2次晚期再次手术。9例患者(18%)在植入后平均14个月放弃双腔起搏,其中4例是由于心律失常。观察到3例“电折返”性心动过速和6例起搏器介导的室上性心律失常转为心室性心律失常。16例患者(32%)在手术后平均12±4个月死亡:12例(33%)有窦房结功能障碍,4例(26%)有房室传导阻滞。12例死亡由心血管疾病引起。(摘要截短至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验