• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

值得为之努力:努力成本对青少年在新颖决策游戏中选择的影响。

Worth working for: The influence of effort costs on teens' choices during a novel decision making game.

机构信息

Graduate Program in Translational Biology, Medicine, and Health, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, United States.

Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 1285 Franz Hall, Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

出版信息

Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Jun;37:100652. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100652. Epub 2019 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100652
PMID:31075712
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6969283/
Abstract

Decision making requires consideration of both the benefits of a given choice and the costs, which can include risk, delay, and effort. Previous research has examined the developmental trajectory of adolescent decision making regarding risk and delay; however, the effects of effort on adolescent decision making remain largely unexplored. In the present study, we pilot tested a novel, developmentally-appropriate task designed to examine developmental differences in the willingness to expend effort during goal pursuit in adolescents (ages 13-16, n = 23) versus young adults (ages 18-23, n = 25). Self-reported reward responsivity correlated with task-related parameter estimates for effort and reward, providing evidence of task validity. Adolescents exhibited reduced sensitivity to physical effort costs compared to adults, effects which did not appear to be driven by differences in subjective task motivation or awareness of the effort requirements. These findings provide preliminary evidence that adolescence may be a time of increased willingness to expend effort during goal pursuit. Effort-based decision making is an understudied but exciting avenue for developmental research, as the willingness to engage in effortful pursuit of new experiences during adolescence may help to facilitate the path to independence.

摘要

决策需要考虑给定选择的收益和成本,其中包括风险、延迟和努力。先前的研究已经考察了青少年在风险和延迟方面的决策制定的发展轨迹;然而,努力对青少年决策制定的影响在很大程度上仍未得到探索。在本研究中,我们对一项新的、适合发展的任务进行了试点测试,该任务旨在考察青少年(13-16 岁,n=23)与年轻成年人(18-23 岁,n=25)在追求目标过程中愿意付出努力的发展差异。自我报告的奖励反应与任务相关的努力和奖励参数估计相关,提供了任务有效性的证据。与成年人相比,青少年对身体努力成本的敏感性降低,这些影响似乎不是由主观任务动机或对努力要求的意识的差异驱动的。这些发现初步表明,青少年在追求目标的过程中可能更愿意付出努力。基于努力的决策制定是发展研究中一个未被充分研究但令人兴奋的领域,因为在青少年时期愿意付出努力去追求新的体验,可能有助于他们走向独立。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72fa/6969283/118ec036dfa3/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72fa/6969283/9f6d62cd860b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72fa/6969283/1b7ee076203f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72fa/6969283/db05ca3e9928/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72fa/6969283/118ec036dfa3/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72fa/6969283/9f6d62cd860b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72fa/6969283/1b7ee076203f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72fa/6969283/db05ca3e9928/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72fa/6969283/118ec036dfa3/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Worth working for: The influence of effort costs on teens' choices during a novel decision making game.值得为之努力:努力成本对青少年在新颖决策游戏中选择的影响。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Jun;37:100652. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100652. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
2
Dopamine antagonism decreases willingness to expend physical, but not cognitive, effort: a comparison of two rodent cost/benefit decision-making tasks.多巴胺拮抗作用会降低付出体力努力的意愿,但不会降低付出认知努力的意愿:两种啮齿动物成本/收益决策任务的比较。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015 Mar;40(4):1005-15. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.285. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
3
Task-specific prioritization of reward and effort information: Novel insights from behavior and computational modeling.任务特异性的奖励和努力信息的优先级化:来自行为和计算建模的新见解。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Jun;19(3):619-636. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-00685-w.
4
Abnormal cognitive effort allocation and its association with amotivation in first-episode psychosis.首发精神病患者异常认知努力分配及其与动机缺乏的关系。
Psychol Med. 2020 Nov;50(15):2599-2609. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719002769. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
5
Worth the Work? Monkeys Discount Rewards by a Subjective Adapting Effort Cost.值得付出努力吗?猴子通过主观适应努力成本来折扣奖励。
J Neurosci. 2023 Oct 4;43(40):6796-6806. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0115-23.2023. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
6
Inefficient effort allocation and negative symptoms in individuals with schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者的无效努力分配与阴性症状
Schizophr Res. 2016 Feb;170(2-3):278-84. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.12.017. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
7
Motivational deficits in effort-based decision making in individuals with subsyndromal depression, first-episode and remitted depression patients.亚综合征抑郁、首发抑郁和缓解期抑郁患者基于努力的决策中动机不足。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Dec 30;220(3):874-82. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.08.056. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
8
Dopamine-Dependent Loss Aversion during Effort-Based Decision-Making.基于努力的决策中的多巴胺依赖的损失厌恶。
J Neurosci. 2020 Jan 15;40(3):661-670. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1760-19.2019. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
9
Dopaminergic mechanisms of individual differences in human effort-based decision-making.人类基于努力的决策个体差异的多巴胺机制。
J Neurosci. 2012 May 2;32(18):6170-6. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6459-11.2012.
10
Dopamine restores cognitive motivation in Parkinson's disease.多巴胺可恢复帕金森病患者的认知动机。
Brain. 2019 Mar 1;142(3):719-732. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy341.

引用本文的文献

1
Hedonic capacity in a Chinese community population sample: psychometric properties of the dimensional anhedonia rating scale (DARS) and exploration of gender differences.中国社区人群样本中的享乐能力:维度性快感缺失评定量表(DARS)的心理测量特性及性别差异探索。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 21;13(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02740-x.
2
State Anhedonia in Young Healthy Adults: Psychometric Properties of the German Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (DARS) and Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic.年轻健康成年人的状态性快感缺失:德国维度性快感缺失评定量表(DARS)的心理测量特性及新冠疫情的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 23;12:682824. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682824. eCollection 2021.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The age of adolescence.青春期。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018 Mar;2(3):223-228. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30022-1. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
2
Corticoinsular circuits encode subjective value expectation and violation for effortful goal-directed behavior.皮质岛叶回路编码了努力目标导向行为的主观价值期望和违反。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 29;115(22):E5233-E5242. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800444115. Epub 2018 May 14.
3
The Effort Paradox: Effort Is Both Costly and Valued.努力悖论:努力既昂贵又有价值。
An effort-based social feedback paradigm reveals aversion to popularity in socially anxious participants and increased motivation in adolescents.
基于努力的社交反馈范式揭示了社交焦虑参与者对受欢迎的反感,以及青少年的动机增强。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 27;16(4):e0249326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249326. eCollection 2021.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;22(4):337-349. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
4
Development of Monetary and Social Reward Processes.货币和社会奖励过程的发展。
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 11;7(1):11128. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11558-6.
5
Control and Effort Costs Influence the Motivational Consequences of Choice.控制成本和努力成本会影响选择的动机结果。
Front Psychol. 2017 May 3;8:675. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00675. eCollection 2017.
6
Toward a Rational and Mechanistic Account of Mental Effort.迈向对心理努力的理性与机械论解释
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jul 25;40:99-124. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031526. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
7
Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying subjective valuation of effort costs.努力成本主观评估背后的神经计算机制。
PLoS Biol. 2017 Feb 24;15(2):e1002598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002598. eCollection 2017 Feb.
8
Modulation of reward-related neural activation on sensation seeking across development.发育过程中寻求刺激行为相关奖励神经激活的调节。
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 15;147:763-771. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.020. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
9
An Upside to Reward Sensitivity: The Hippocampus Supports Enhanced Reinforcement Learning in Adolescence.奖励敏感性的好处:海马体支持青少年增强的强化学习。
Neuron. 2016 Oct 5;92(1):93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.08.031.
10
Neural substrates underlying effort, time, and risk-based decision making in motivated behavior.动机行为中基于努力、时间和风险的决策背后的神经基质。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016 Sep;133:233-256. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.07.015. Epub 2016 Jul 15.