• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

努力悖论:努力既昂贵又有价值。

The Effort Paradox: Effort Is Both Costly and Valued.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, Ontario M1C 1A4, Canada; Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, 105 St. George Street, Ontario M56 3E6, Canada.

Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;22(4):337-349. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.007
PMID:29477776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6172040/
Abstract

According to prominent models in cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and economics, effort (be it physical or mental) is costly: when given a choice, humans and non-human animals alike tend to avoid effort. Here, we suggest that the opposite is also true and review extensive evidence that effort can also add value. Not only can the same outcomes be more rewarding if we apply more (not less) effort, sometimes we select options precisely because they require effort. Given the increasing recognition of effort's role in motivation, cognitive control, and value-based decision-making, considering this neglected side of effort will not only improve formal computational models, but also provide clues about how to promote sustained mental effort across time.

摘要

根据认知心理学、神经科学和经济学中的重要模型,努力(无论是体力上的还是脑力上的)都是有代价的:在面临选择时,人类和非人类动物都会倾向于避免付出努力。在这里,我们提出相反的观点也是正确的,并回顾了广泛的证据表明努力也可以增加价值。不仅如果我们付出更多(而不是更少)的努力,同样的结果可能会更有回报,有时我们选择某个选项恰恰是因为它需要付出努力。鉴于人们越来越认识到努力在动机、认知控制和基于价值的决策中的作用,考虑到努力被忽视的这一方面不仅将改进正式的计算模型,还将为如何促进长时间持续的脑力付出提供线索。

相似文献

1
The Effort Paradox: Effort Is Both Costly and Valued.努力悖论:努力既昂贵又有价值。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;22(4):337-349. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
2
Learned industriousness.习得性勤奋。
Psychol Rev. 1992 Apr;99(2):248-67. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.2.248.
3
Rewarding cognitive effort increases the intrinsic value of mental labor.奖励认知努力会增加脑力劳动的内在价值。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 1;119(5). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2111785119.
4
Conscious cognitive effort in cognitive control.认知控制中的有意识认知努力。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2023 Mar;14(2):e1629. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1629. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
5
Neural Mechanisms for Adaptive Learned Avoidance of Mental Effort.适应学习避免心理努力的神经机制。
J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 7;38(10):2631-2651. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1995-17.2018. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
6
Dopamine restores cognitive motivation in Parkinson's disease.多巴胺可恢复帕金森病患者的认知动机。
Brain. 2019 Mar 1;142(3):719-732. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy341.
7
Dopamine-Dependent Loss Aversion during Effort-Based Decision-Making.基于努力的决策中的多巴胺依赖的损失厌恶。
J Neurosci. 2020 Jan 15;40(3):661-670. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1760-19.2019. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
8
An integrative effort: Bridging motivational intensity theory and recent neurocomputational and neuronal models of effort and control allocation.一项综合性的努力:弥合动机强度理论与最近的神经计算和神经元努力与控制分配模型之间的差距。
Psychol Rev. 2023 Jul;130(4):1081-1103. doi: 10.1037/rev0000372. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
9
Dopaminergic medication increases motivation to exert cognitive control by reducing subjective effort costs in Parkinson's patients.多巴胺能药物通过降低帕金森病患者的主观努力成本来增加执行认知控制的动机。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2022 Sep;193:107652. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2022.107652. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
10
Computational mechanisms underlying the dynamics of physical and cognitive fatigue.物理和认知疲劳动态的计算机制。
Cognition. 2023 Nov;240:105603. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105603. Epub 2023 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Effortful leisure is a source of meaning in everyday life.积极休闲是日常生活意义的一个来源。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jul 24;3(1):112. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00292-9.
2
Predicting the achievement emotions of elementary and middle school students in online learning based on control-value theory.基于控制-价值理论预测中小学生在线学习中的成就情绪
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 4;16:1601052. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1601052. eCollection 2025.
3
Effort Expenditure Reduces Prosocial Decision-Making: Computational Principles and Neural Mechanisms.努力付出会降低亲社会决策:计算原理与神经机制。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Aug 1;46(11):e70290. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70290.
4
Cholinergic modulation of dopamine release drives effortful behavior.多巴胺释放的胆碱能调节驱动费力行为。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jun 21:2025.06.18.660394. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.18.660394.
5
Improving Clarity and Interpretability of Items in a Bilingual Index of Propensity to Integrate Research Evidence Into Clinical Decision-Making in Rehabilitation.提高康复领域将研究证据整合到临床决策中的双语倾向指数中条目的清晰度和可解释性。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;31(5):e70196. doi: 10.1111/jep.70196.
6
The temporal dynamics of metacognitive experiences track rational adaptations in task performance.元认知体验的时间动态追踪任务表现中的理性适应。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jul 3;3(1):96. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00282-x.
7
Disentangling the effects of task difficulty and effort on flow experience.理清任务难度和努力程度对心流体验的影响。
Psychol Res. 2025 Jun 26;89(4):113. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02128-x.
8
Prolonged passive vibration of Achilles and patellar tendons decreases effort perception during subsequent cycling tasks.跟腱和髌腱的长时间被动振动会降低后续骑行任务中的用力感知。
J Sport Health Sci. 2025 May 24;14:101061. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101061.
9
Achievement (not effort) makes people feel entitled to rewards.是成就(而非努力)让人觉得理应获得奖励。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 May 13;122(19):e2409131122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2409131122. Epub 2025 May 8.
10
Evidence of a social evaluation penalty for using AI.使用人工智能存在社会评价惩罚的证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 May 13;122(19):e2426766122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2426766122. Epub 2025 May 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Neural systems of cognitive demand avoidance.认知需求回避的神经系统。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Feb 4;123:41-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
2
The Interpersonal Sunk-Cost Effect.人际沉没成本效应。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Jul;29(7):1072-1083. doi: 10.1177/0956797617752641. Epub 2018 May 11.
3
Reward sensitivity following boredom and cognitive effort: A high-powered neurophysiological investigation.无聊和认知努力后的奖励敏感性:一项高影响力的神经生理学研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Feb 4;123:159-168. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.033. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
4
Cognitive capacity limitations and Need for Cognition differentially predict reward-induced cognitive effort expenditure.认知能力限制和认知需求不同地预测奖励诱导的认知努力支出。
Cognition. 2018 Mar;172:101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
5
Why not try harder? Computational approach to motivation deficits in neuro-psychiatric diseases.为何不更加努力?神经精神疾病中动机缺陷的计算方法。
Brain. 2018 Mar 1;141(3):629-650. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx278.
6
Anticipating cognitive effort: roles of perceived error-likelihood and time demands.预期认知努力:感知错误可能性和时间需求的作用。
Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):1033-1056. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0943-x. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
7
Six Questions for the Resource Model of Control (and Some Answers).关于控制资源模型的六个问题(及一些答案)。
Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2015 Oct;9(10):511-524. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12200. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
8
A pre-registered naturalistic observation of within domain mental fatigue and domain-general depletion of self-control.一项关于领域内心理疲劳和自我控制的领域一般性耗竭的预注册自然观察研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 20;12(9):e0182980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182980. eCollection 2017.
9
When Novel Rituals Lead to Intergroup Bias: Evidence From Economic Games and Neurophysiology.当新颖仪式导致群体间偏见:来自经济博弈和神经生理学的证据。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Jun;28(6):733-750. doi: 10.1177/0956797617695099. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
10
Examining depletion theories under conditions of within-task transfer.在任务内迁移条件下检验损耗理论。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Jul;146(7):988-1008. doi: 10.1037/xge0000290. Epub 2017 Apr 27.