1The Orthopedic Center of St. Louis, Missouri.
2Wilderness Spine Services, Columbus, Georgia.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 May 10;31(3):317-325. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.SPINE1956. Print 2019 Sep 1.
OBJECTIVE: Food and Drug Administration-approved investigational device exemption (IDE) studies have provided level I evidence supporting cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) as a safe and effective alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Long-term CDA outcomes continue to be evaluated. Here, the authors present outcomes at 10 years postoperatively for the single-level CDA arm of an IDE study (postapproval study). METHODS: The primary endpoint was overall success, a composite variable composed of five criteria: 1) Neck Disability Index score improvement ≥ 15 points; 2) maintenance or improvement in neurological status; 3) no decline in anterior or posterior functional spinal unit (FSU) height of more than 2 mm compared to 6 weeks postoperatively; 4) no serious adverse event (AE) caused by the implant or the implant and the surgical procedure; and 5) no additional surgery classified as a failure. Additional safety and effectiveness measures included numeric rating scales for neck pain and arm pain, SF-36 quality-of-life physical and mental components, patient satisfaction, range of motion, and AEs. RESULTS: From the reported assessments at 7 years postoperatively to the 10-year postoperative follow-up, the scores for all patient-reported outcomes, rate of overall success (without FSU), and proportion of patients at least maintaining their neurological function remained stable for the CDA group. Nine patients had secondary surgery at the index level, increasing the secondary surgery cumulative rate from 6.6% to 10.3%. In that same time frame, four patients experienced a serious implant or implant/surgical procedure-related AE, for a 10-year cumulative rate of 7.8%. Seven patients had any second surgery at adjacent levels, for a 10-year cumulative rate of 13.8%. Average angular motion at both the index and adjacent levels was well maintained without creating hypermobility. Class IV heterotopic ossification increased from 1.2% at 2 years to 4.6% at 7 years and 9.0% at 10 years. Patient satisfaction was > 90% at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: CDA remained safe and effective out to 10 years postoperatively, with results comparable to 7-year outcomes and with high patient satisfaction.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT00667459 (clinicaltrials.gov).
目的:食品和药物管理局批准的研究性设备豁免(IDE)研究提供了一级证据,支持颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)作为一种安全有效的替代方法,用于治疗前路颈椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)。CDA 的长期结果仍在评估中。在这里,作者报告了一项 IDE 研究(批准后研究)中单节段 CDA 臂术后 10 年的结果。
方法:主要终点是整体成功,这是一个由五个标准组成的复合变量:1)颈痛残疾指数评分改善≥15 分;2)神经状态保持或改善;3)与术后 6 周相比,前或后功能脊柱单位(FSU)高度无超过 2 毫米的下降;4)无因植入物或植入物和手术引起的严重不良事件(AE);5)无被归类为失败的额外手术。其他安全性和有效性措施包括颈部疼痛和手臂疼痛的数字评分量表、SF-36 生活质量身体和精神成分、患者满意度、活动范围和 AE。
结果:从术后 7 年的报告评估到 10 年的术后随访,CDA 组的所有患者报告结果评分、整体成功率(无 FSU)的比率以及至少保持神经功能的患者比例保持稳定。9 名患者在指数水平进行了二次手术,使二次手术累积率从 6.6%增加到 10.3%。在同一时间段内,有 4 名患者发生了与植入物或植入物/手术相关的严重 AE,10 年累积率为 7.8%。7 名患者在相邻水平进行了任何第二次手术,10 年累积率为 13.8%。指数和相邻水平的平均角运动均保持良好,没有产生过度活动。IV 级异位骨化从第 2 年的 1.2%增加到第 7 年的 4.6%和第 10 年的 9.0%。患者满意度在 10 年时仍>90%。
结论:CDA 在术后 10 年内仍然安全有效,结果与 7 年结果相当,患者满意度高。临床试验注册号:NCT00667459(clinicaltrials.gov)。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019-5-10
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024-10-23
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024-4-3