Specialty Registrar - Trauma & Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester, Gwendolen Road, Leicester, LE5 4PW, United Kingdom.
Professor of Orthopaedics and Hand Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester, United Kingdom.
Injury. 2019 Jun;50(6):1232-1236. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.04.025. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
Social deprivation is associated with many adult fractures including distal radius fractures but the mechanisms for this are unclear. The aim of this study was to identify if social deprivation was associated with falls risk, mechanism of injury or osteoporosis in patients with a fragility fracture of the distal radius.
Details of all patients aged 50 years and over presenting with a radiographically confirmed fracture of the distal radius over a one year period, were prospectively recorded. Patients were sent a questionnaire pack including questions regarding place and mechanism of injury, comorbidity assessment, falls risk assessment tool and FRAX assessment of bone health and fracture risk.
333 out of 521 eligible patients completed the questionnaire (279 female; 54 male, response rate = 64%). There was no difference between characteristics of responders and non-responders (p = 0.58). DRF rate was higher in socially deprived quintiles (p = 0.040). Less falls occurred in the home in socially deprived patients (Q1/2: 35%: Q3-5: 48%, p = 0.037) with more falls outdoors (Q1/2: 39%: Q3-5: 24%, p = 0.001). There was no difference in height from which falls took place with most occurring from standing height (Q1/2: 81%: Q3-5: 86%, p = 0.336). Linear regression analysis found no relationship between social deprivation rank and FRAX scores (major fracture risk: p = 0.274, hip fracture risk: p = 0.283) but demonstrated a significant relationship between social deprivation and increased number of falls risk factors (p = 0.002). Mean number of falls risk factors was higher in the two most socially deprived quintiles (Q1/2: 3.62: Q3-5: 2.79, p = 0.028).
We have identified increased falls risk as an important reason for DRF in socially deprived patients. Knowing which patients are at highest risk allows interventions to be efficiently targeted. We would recommend resources should be targeted towards patients from socially deprived areas and focused on specific falls prevention strategies.
社会剥夺与许多成人骨折有关,包括桡骨远端骨折,但机制尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定社会剥夺是否与桡骨远端脆性骨折患者的跌倒风险、损伤机制或骨质疏松症有关。
前瞻性记录了一年内所有 50 岁及以上、经影像学证实桡骨远端骨折的患者的详细信息。向患者发送了一份调查问卷包,其中包括有关受伤地点和机制、合并症评估、跌倒风险评估工具以及 FRAX 评估骨健康和骨折风险的问题。
在 521 名符合条件的患者中,有 333 名完成了问卷调查(女性 279 名,男性 54 名,应答率为 64%)。应答者和未应答者的特征无差异(p=0.58)。在社会剥夺五分位组中,DRF 发生率较高(p=0.040)。社会剥夺程度较高的患者跌倒发生在家中的次数较少(Q1/2:35%:Q3-5:48%,p=0.037),而跌倒发生在户外的次数较多(Q1/2:39%:Q3-5:24%,p=0.001)。从站立高度跌倒的高度无差异(Q1/2:81%:Q3-5:86%,p=0.336)。线性回归分析发现社会剥夺等级与 FRAX 评分之间没有关系(主要骨折风险:p=0.274,髋部骨折风险:p=0.283),但表明社会剥夺与跌倒危险因素数量的增加存在显著关系(p=0.002)。两个最受社会剥夺影响的五分位组的跌倒危险因素数量较高(Q1/2:3.62:Q3-5:2.79,p=0.028)。
我们发现跌倒风险增加是社会剥夺患者桡骨远端骨折的一个重要原因。了解哪些患者风险最高,可以使干预措施有针对性地进行。我们建议将资源投向社会贫困地区的患者,并侧重于特定的防跌倒策略。