• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水力特性解释了亚马逊森林对 2015 年厄尔尼诺引发干旱的差异响应。

Hydraulic traits explain differential responses of Amazonian forests to the 2015 El Niño-induced drought.

机构信息

Department of Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, CP 6109, University of Campinas- UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.

College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4SB, UK.

出版信息

New Phytol. 2019 Aug;223(3):1253-1266. doi: 10.1111/nph.15909. Epub 2019 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1111/nph.15909
PMID:31077396
Abstract

Reducing uncertainties in the response of tropical forests to global change requires understanding how intra- and interannual climatic variability selects for different species, community functional composition and ecosystem functioning, so that the response to climatic events of differing frequency and severity can be predicted. Here we present an extensive dataset of hydraulic traits of dominant species in two tropical Amazon forests with contrasting precipitation regimes - low seasonality forest (LSF) and high seasonality forest (HSF) - and relate them to community and ecosystem response to the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) of 2015. Hydraulic traits indicated higher drought tolerance in the HSF than in the LSF. Despite more intense drought and lower plant water potentials in HSF during the 2015-ENSO, greater xylem embolism resistance maintained similar hydraulic safety margin as in LSF. This likely explains how ecosystem-scale whole-forest canopy conductance at HSF maintained a similar response to atmospheric drought as at LSF, despite their water transport systems operating at different water potentials. Our results indicate that contrasting precipitation regimes (at seasonal and interannual time scales) select for assemblies of hydraulic traits and taxa at the community level, which may have a significant role in modulating forest drought response at ecosystem scales.

摘要

为了减少热带森林对全球变化响应的不确定性,需要了解气候的年内和年际变异性如何选择不同的物种、群落功能组成和生态系统功能,以便预测不同频率和严重程度的气候事件的响应。在这里,我们呈现了两个具有不同降水格局的热带亚马逊森林(低季节性森林(LSF)和高季节性森林(HSF))中主要物种水力特性的大量数据集,并将其与群落和生态系统对 2015 年厄尔尼诺-南方涛动(ENSO)的响应相关联。水力特性表明,HSF 比 LSF 具有更高的耐旱性。尽管在 2015-ENSO 期间 HSF 的干旱程度更严重,植物水势更低,但更大的木质部栓塞阻力保持了与 LSF 相似的水力安全裕度。这可能解释了为什么尽管它们的水分传输系统在不同的水势下运行,但 HSF 的生态系统尺度全林冠导度对大气干旱的响应与 LSF 相似。我们的结果表明,不同的降水格局(季节性和年际时间尺度)在群落水平上选择了具有不同水力特性和分类群的组合,这可能在调节森林干旱响应方面发挥重要作用。

相似文献

1
Hydraulic traits explain differential responses of Amazonian forests to the 2015 El Niño-induced drought.水力特性解释了亚马逊森林对 2015 年厄尔尼诺引发干旱的差异响应。
New Phytol. 2019 Aug;223(3):1253-1266. doi: 10.1111/nph.15909. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
2
Plant hydraulics, stomatal control, and the response of a tropical forest to water stress over multiple temporal scales.植物水力学、气孔控制以及热带森林在多个时间尺度上对水分胁迫的响应。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Jul;28(14):4359-4376. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16179. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
3
Plant water use responses along secondary forest succession during the 2015-2016 El Niño drought in Panama.巴拿马 2015-2016 年厄尔尼诺干旱期间次生林演替过程中植物水分利用的响应。
New Phytol. 2018 Aug;219(3):885-899. doi: 10.1111/nph.15071. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
4
Resilience of seed production to a severe El Niño-induced drought across functional groups and dispersal types.种子生产对严重厄尔尼诺引发的干旱的恢复力在功能群和扩散类型上的表现。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Nov;24(11):5270-5280. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14416. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
5
Causes of reduced leaf-level photosynthesis during strong El Niño drought in a Central Amazon forest.强烈厄尔尼诺干旱期间亚马孙中部森林叶片光合作用降低的原因。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Sep;24(9):4266-4279. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14293. Epub 2018 May 30.
6
Amazon drought and forest response: Largely reduced forest photosynthesis but slightly increased canopy greenness during the extreme drought of 2015/2016.亚马逊干旱与森林响应:2015/2016 年极端干旱期间,森林光合作用大幅下降,但冠层绿色度略有增加。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 May;24(5):1919-1934. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14056. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
7
El Niño drought increased canopy turnover in Amazon forests.厄尔尼诺干旱增加了亚马逊森林的林冠更替。
New Phytol. 2018 Aug;219(3):959-971. doi: 10.1111/nph.15110. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
8
Importance of hydraulic strategy trade-offs in structuring response of canopy trees to extreme drought in central Amazon.水力策略权衡在构建亚马孙中心地带林冠树木对极端干旱的响应中的重要性。
Oecologia. 2021 Sep;197(1):13-24. doi: 10.1007/s00442-021-04924-9. Epub 2021 May 5.
9
ENSO Drives interannual variation of forest woody growth across the tropics.厄尔尼诺-南方涛动现象驱动热带森林木质生长的年际变化。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Oct 8;373(1760):20170410. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0410.
10
A catastrophic tropical drought kills hydraulically vulnerable tree species.灾难性的热带干旱会杀死对水力脆弱的树种。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 May;26(5):3122-3133. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15037. Epub 2020 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Lianas in tropical dry seasonal forests have a high hydraulic efficiency but not always a higher embolism resistance than lianas in rainforests.热带干旱季节林中的藤本植物具有较高的水力效率,但并不总是比雨林中的藤本植物具有更高的栓塞抗性。
Ann Bot. 2024 Jul 9;134(2):337-350. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcae077.
2
Anatomical traits related to leaf and branch hydraulic functioning on Amazonian savanna plants.与亚马逊稀树草原植物叶片和枝条水力功能相关的解剖学特征。
AoB Plants. 2023 Apr 24;15(3):plad018. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plad018. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Basin-wide variation in tree hydraulic safety margins predicts the carbon balance of Amazon forests.
流域范围内树木水力安全裕度的变化可预测亚马逊森林的碳平衡。
Nature. 2023 May;617(7959):111-117. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05971-3. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
4
Recurrent droughts increase risk of cascading tipping events by outpacing adaptive capacities in the Amazon rainforest.反复发生的干旱使亚马逊雨林的适应能力相形见绌,增加了级联 tipping 事件发生的风险。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 9;119(32):e2120777119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120777119. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
5
Divergence of hydraulic traits among tropical forest trees across topographic and vertical environment gradients in Borneo.在婆罗洲,地形和垂直环境梯度上的热带森林树木的水力性状存在差异。
New Phytol. 2022 Sep;235(6):2183-2198. doi: 10.1111/nph.18280. Epub 2022 Jun 26.
6
Variations in leaf water status and drought tolerance of dominant tree species growing in multi-aged tropical forests in Thailand.泰国多龄热带森林中优势树种的叶片水分状况和耐旱性变化
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 27;12(1):6882. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10988-1.
7
Dry Season Transpiration and Soil Water Dynamics in the Central Amazon.亚马孙中部旱季的蒸腾作用与土壤水分动态
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Mar 24;13:825097. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.825097. eCollection 2022.
8
Forest fragmentation impacts the seasonality of Amazonian evergreen canopies.森林破碎化影响亚马逊常绿林冠层的季节性。
Nat Commun. 2022 Feb 17;13(1):917. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28490-7.
9
A User Manual to Measure Gas Diffusion Kinetics in Plants: Pneumatron Construction, Operation, and Data Analysis.植物气体扩散动力学测量用户手册:气动测量仪的构建、操作与数据分析
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jun 7;12:633595. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.633595. eCollection 2021.
10
Importance of hydraulic strategy trade-offs in structuring response of canopy trees to extreme drought in central Amazon.水力策略权衡在构建亚马孙中心地带林冠树木对极端干旱的响应中的重要性。
Oecologia. 2021 Sep;197(1):13-24. doi: 10.1007/s00442-021-04924-9. Epub 2021 May 5.