Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Heart Institute of Japan, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Heart Institute of Japan, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Oct;108(4):1210-1216. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 May 8.
The purpose of this study is to assess risk factors of neo-aortic regurgitation (AR) after an arterial switch operation and outcomes of neo-aortic valve surgery.
This is a retrospective study of 469 hospital survivors after arterial switch operation from 1982 to 2016. Preoperative diagnoses included 285 transpositions of the great arteries with intact septum, 140 transpositions with ventricular septal defect, and 44 double-outlet right ventricles. More than mild preoperative pulmonary regurgitation was found in 15 patients. Median age at the operation was 1.0 months (range, 0.1-81.5). Concomitant relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction was performed in 20 patients. Seventy-seven patients had more than mild neo-AR at hospital discharge.
More than moderate neo-AR was found in 41 patients (8.6%) at a median follow-up of 19.0 years (range, 0.1-35.2). Multivariate analysis identified more than mild preoperative pulmonary regurgitation, concomitant relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, and more than mild neo-AR at hospital discharge as risk factors for late neo-AR. Seventeen patients (3.6%) underwent neo-aortic valve surgeries, including 11 aortic valve replacements, 3 aortic valve plasties, 2 Konno procedures, and 1 aortic root replacement, with median age at the neo-aortic valve surgery of 16.5 years (range, 6.2-27.3). There were 2 late deaths and 5 reoperations to the neo-aortic valve in 4 patients.
Concomitant relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and preoperative more than mild pulmonary regurgitation increase the risk of neo-AR after the arterial switch operation. Reoperation for neo-AR can be done safely.
本研究旨在评估动脉调转术后新发主动脉瓣反流(neo-aortic regurgitation,AR)的风险因素和新主动脉瓣手术的结果。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 1982 年至 2016 年间 469 例在我院存活的动脉调转术患者。术前诊断包括 285 例完全性大动脉转位伴完整室间隔、140 例室间隔缺损型大动脉转位和 44 例右心室双出口。15 例患者术前存在中重度肺动脉瓣反流。手术时中位年龄为 1.0 个月(范围,0.1-81.5)。20 例患者同时行左心室流出道梗阻矫治术。77 例患者出院时存在中重度新发 AR。
中位随访 19.0 年(范围,0.1-35.2)时,41 例(8.6%)患者发现中重度新发 AR。多变量分析显示,术前存在中重度肺动脉瓣反流、同时行左心室流出道梗阻矫治术以及出院时存在中重度新发 AR 是新发 AR 的危险因素。17 例(3.6%)患者接受了新主动脉瓣手术,包括 11 例主动脉瓣置换术、3 例主动脉瓣成形术、2 例 Konno 手术和 1 例主动脉根部置换术,新主动脉瓣手术时的中位年龄为 16.5 岁(范围,6.2-27.3)。4 例患者中有 2 例出现晚期死亡,5 例患者再次行新主动脉瓣手术。
同时行左心室流出道梗阻矫治术和术前存在中重度肺动脉瓣反流会增加动脉调转术后新发 AR 的风险。再次行新主动脉瓣手术是安全的。