Murillo Carlos, Falla Deborah, Rushton Alison, Sanderson Andy, Heneghan Nicola R
Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK.
Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2019 Aug;47:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 3.
The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in passive muscular stiffness between the superficial multifidus (SM) and deep multifidus (DM), and to compare their passive and active stiffness in individuals with low back pain (LBP) and asymptomatic individuals. Fifteen LBP individuals and 15 asymptomatic individuals were recruited. Passive stiffness of the SM and DM was measured bilaterally using shear wave elastography (SWE) with participants lying prone. Active stiffness was measured for the SM during trunk extension, and the contraction ratio was calculated. DM displayed higher passive muscular stiffness than SM in both the asymptomatic and LBP groups (14.41 ± 2.62 and 15.40 ± 2.77 kPa respectively; p < 0.001). Individuals with LBP exhibited higher passive muscular stiffness of SM (LBP: 10.15 ± 4.21, asymptomatic: 6.84 ± 1.69 kPa; p < 0.005) and a lower contraction ratio (LBP: 1.54 ± 0.47, asymptomatic: 2.65 ± 1.36 kPa; p < 0.003) compared to the asymptomatic group. The findings support a differentiation in passive muscular stiffness between SM and DM and provide evidence for an alteration in muscular stiffness at rest in individuals with LBP. The lower increase of muscular stiffness with contraction observed for those with LBP may reflect a deficit in activation of the multifidus.
本研究的目的是调查表层多裂肌(SM)和深层多裂肌(DM)之间被动肌肉僵硬度的差异,并比较腰痛(LBP)患者和无症状个体的被动和主动僵硬度。招募了15名LBP患者和15名无症状个体。参与者俯卧位时,使用剪切波弹性成像(SWE)双侧测量SM和DM的被动僵硬度。在躯干伸展过程中测量SM的主动僵硬度,并计算收缩率。在无症状组和LBP组中,DM的被动肌肉僵硬度均高于SM(分别为14.41±2.62和15.40±2.77 kPa;p<0.001)。与无症状组相比,LBP患者的SM被动肌肉僵硬度更高(LBP:10.15±4.21,无症状:6.84±1.69 kPa;p<0.005),收缩率更低(LBP:1.54±0.47,无症状:2.65±1.36 kPa;p<0.003)。这些发现支持了SM和DM之间被动肌肉僵硬度的差异,并为LBP患者静息时肌肉僵硬度的改变提供了证据。LBP患者收缩时肌肉僵硬度增加较低可能反映了多裂肌激活不足。