Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Arch Dis Child. 2019 Nov;104(11):1056-1063. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-316917. Epub 2019 May 11.
To investigate the associations of hearing thresholds and slight to mild hearing loss with academic, behavioural and quality of life outcomes in children at a population level.
children aged 11-12 years in the population-based cross-sectional Child Health CheckPoint study within the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. mean hearing threshold across 1, 2 and 4 kHz (better and worse ear); slight/mild hearing loss (threshold of 16-40 decibels hearing loss (dB HL)). National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy, language, teacher-reported learning, parent and teacher reported behaviour and self-reported quality of life. linear regression quantified associations of hearing threshold/loss with outcomes.
Of 1483 children (mean age 11.5 years), 9.2% and 13.1% had slight/mild bilateral and unilateral hearing loss, respectively. Per SD increment in better ear threshold (5.7 dB HL), scores were worse on several academic outcomes (eg, reading 0.11 SD, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.16), parent-reported behaviour (0.06 SD, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.11) and physical (0.09 SD, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.14) and psychosocial (0.06 SD, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.11) Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). Compared with normally hearing children, children with bilateral slight/mild losses scored 0.2-0.3 SDs lower in sentence repetition, teacher-reported learning and physical PedsQL but not other outcomes. Similar but attenuated patterns were seen in unilateral slight/mild losses.
Hearing thresholds and slight/mild hearing loss showed small but important associations with some child outcomes at 11-12 years. Justifying hearing screening or intervention at this age would require better understanding of its longitudinal and indirect effects, alongside effective management and appropriate early identification programmes.
在人群水平上研究听力阈值和轻度至中度听力损失与儿童的学业、行为和生活质量结果之间的关联。
在澳大利亚儿童纵向研究中的基于人群的横断面儿童健康检查点研究中,11-12 岁的儿童。1、2 和 4 kHz 时的平均听力阈值(较好和较差耳);轻度/中度听力损失(听力损失阈值为 16-40 分贝)。全国评估计划——读写和计算能力、语言、教师报告的学习、家长和教师报告的行为以及自我报告的生活质量。线性回归量化了听力阈值/损失与结果的关联。
在 1483 名儿童(平均年龄 11.5 岁)中,分别有 9.2%和 13.1%的儿童有双侧和单侧轻度/中度听力损失。在较好耳阈值每增加一个标准差(5.7 分贝),在几个学业成绩(例如,阅读 0.11 标准差,95%置信区间 0.05 至 0.16)、家长报告的行为(0.06 标准差,95%置信区间 0.01 至 0.11)和身体(0.09 标准差,95%置信区间 0.04 至 0.14)和心理社会(0.06 标准差,95%置信区间 0.01 至 0.11)儿童生活质量问卷(PedsQL)上的得分更差。与听力正常的儿童相比,双侧轻度/中度听力损失的儿童在句子重复、教师报告的学习和身体 PedsQL 方面的得分低 0.2-0.3 标准差,但其他结果则不然。单侧轻度/中度听力损失也出现了类似但减弱的模式。
在 11-12 岁时,听力阈值和轻度/中度听力损失与一些儿童结果之间存在较小但重要的关联。在这个年龄段进行听力筛查或干预需要更好地理解其纵向和间接影响,以及有效的管理和适当的早期识别计划。