Institute of Mental Health, Suzhou Guangji Hospital, The Affiliated Guangji Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215137, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Anhui Rongjun Hospital, Bengbu, 233499, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Psychiatr Q. 2019 Sep;90(3):471-480. doi: 10.1007/s11126-019-09641-4.
Cognitive deficits are a core feature of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, there are no previous studies that directly compare cognitive performance between first-episode drug-naive depressive patients (FDDP) and medicated depressive patients (MDP). Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether there were the differences in cognitive functions between FDDP and MDP. Sixty-two FDDP, 111 MDP and 90 healthy controls were enrolled in a Chinese population. Cognitive functions were assessed using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). There were the differences in the RBANS total score (F = 26.55, p < 0.001), subscales of immediate memory (F = 3.95, p = 0.02), language (F = 54.11, p < 0.001) and delayed memory (F = 11.19, p = 0.001) among the three groups after controlling for gender, education, smoking and body mass index (BMI). These differences in the RBANS total score, subscales of language and delayed memory passed the Bonferroni corrections (all, p < 0.05). Compared to healthy controls, FDDP and MDP had poorer cognitive performance including the RBANS total score, and subscales of language and delayed memory (all, p < 0.05) after controlling for the variables. FDDP experienced greater language deficits than MDP (p < 0.05) after controlling for the variables. Education was correlated with the language score in FDDP (r = 0.61, p < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that education was an independent contributor to the language score in FDDP (ß = 3.11, t = 5.48, p < 0.001). Our findings indicated that FDDP had poorer language performance than MDP. Moreover, education could influence the language performance in FDDP.
认知缺陷是重度抑郁症(MDD)的核心特征。然而,目前还没有研究直接比较初发未经药物治疗的抑郁患者(FDDP)和药物治疗的抑郁患者(MDP)的认知表现。因此,本研究旨在探讨 FDDP 和 MDP 之间的认知功能是否存在差异。在一项中国人群研究中,共纳入了 62 例 FDDP、111 例 MDP 和 90 例健康对照者。使用重复神经心理状态评估测试(RBANS)评估认知功能。在控制性别、教育、吸烟和体重指数(BMI)后,三组间 RBANS 总分(F=26.55,p<0.001)、即刻记忆分测验(F=3.95,p=0.02)、语言分测验(F=54.11,p<0.001)和延迟记忆分测验(F=11.19,p=0.001)存在差异。在进行 Bonferroni 校正后,RBANS 总分、语言分测验和延迟记忆分测验的这些差异均有统计学意义(均,p<0.05)。与健康对照组相比,FDDP 和 MDP 的认知表现较差,包括 RBANS 总分和语言、延迟记忆分测验(均,p<0.05),在控制变量后。FDDP 的语言缺陷较 MDP 更明显(p<0.05),在控制变量后。教育与 FDDP 的语言评分呈正相关(r=0.61,p<0.001)。多元回归分析表明,教育是 FDDP 语言评分的独立贡献因素(β=3.11,t=5.48,p<0.001)。我们的研究结果表明,FDDP 的语言表现较 MDP 差。此外,教育可以影响 FDDP 的语言表现。