Cui Lanjun, Jiao Bingtian, Han Quanhong
Department of Ophthalmology, Shandong Provincial Dezhou Youfu Hospital, Dezhou, 253000, Shandong, China.
Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin, 300041, China.
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Aug;10(4):1283-1296. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0631-5. Epub 2019 May 11.
Diabetes is a common cause of new sight loss in populations world-wide, and diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of visual deficits in the diabetic populations of developed countries. We have performed a meta-analysis to evaluate whether combined treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections and macular photocoagulation (MPC) is more efficacious than primary monotherapy with anti-VEGF injections in patients with DME.
We systematically searched the PubMed and Web of Science databases for studies providing sufficient information for a comparison of pre- and post-treatment of central macular thickness (CMT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between two groups of patients with DME given interventional therapies (monotherapy with an anti-VEGF agent vs. combination therapy with an anti-VEGF agent and MPC) before January 2019. A meta-analysis was performed to summarize the results of the studies included in the systematic review.
The results of our meta-analysis indicated that post-treatment CMT was significantly lower at 3 months in DME patients receiving combination therapy with bevacizumab, a humanized anti-VEGF antibody, and MPC than in those receiving monotherapy with bevacizumab. The results also showed that post-treatment CMT was lower in DME patients given ranibizumab, an anti-VEGF agent, in combination with MPC at 6, 9 and 12 months than in those treated with ranibizumab alone. However, no significant differences were found in post-treatment BCVA at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months between DME patients receiving combination therapy with an anti-VEGF agent (bevacizumab or ranibizumab) and MPC and those receiving monotherapy with an anti-VEGF agent.
In conclusion, the results of our meta-analysis demonstrate a transiently synergistic effect of MPC on CMT when this treatment is combined with anti-VEGF agents, whereas no similar synergistic effect could be detected on the BCVA. A relatively longer follow-up was essential to be able to evaluate the long-term existence of this synergistic effect.
糖尿病是全球人群新发视力丧失的常见原因,而糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)是发达国家糖尿病患者视力缺陷的主要原因。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)注射与黄斑光凝(MPC)联合治疗是否比DME患者单纯使用抗VEGF注射的初始单一疗法更有效。
我们系统检索了PubMed和Web of Science数据库,查找在2019年1月之前提供足够信息以比较两组接受介入治疗(抗VEGF药物单一疗法与抗VEGF药物和MPC联合疗法)的DME患者治疗前后中心黄斑厚度(CMT)和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的研究。进行荟萃分析以总结系统评价中纳入研究的结果。
我们的荟萃分析结果表明,接受人源化抗VEGF抗体贝伐单抗与MPC联合治疗的DME患者在3个月时的治疗后CMT显著低于接受贝伐单抗单一疗法的患者。结果还显示,接受抗VEGF药物雷珠单抗与MPC联合治疗的DME患者在6、9和12个月时的治疗后CMT低于单独接受雷珠单抗治疗的患者。然而,在接受抗VEGF药物(贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗)与MPC联合治疗的DME患者和接受抗VEGF药物单一疗法的患者之间,在1、3、6、9和12个月时的治疗后BCVA未发现显著差异。
总之,我们的荟萃分析结果表明,MPC与抗VEGF药物联合使用时对CMT有短暂的协同作用,而在BCVA上未检测到类似的协同作用。进行相对较长时间的随访对于评估这种协同作用的长期存在至关重要。