Bang Chang Seok, Lee Jae Jun, Baik Gwang Ho
Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Sakju-ro 77, Chuncheon, Gangwon-do 24253, Korea.
Institute of New Frontier Research, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon 24253, Korea.
J Clin Med. 2019 May 10;8(5):657. doi: 10.3390/jcm8050657.
Serum pepsinogen assay (sPGA), which reveals serum pepsinogen (PG) I concentration and the PG I/PG II ratio, is a non-invasive test for predicting chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) and gastric neoplasms. Although various cut-off values have been suggested, PG I ≤70 ng/mL and a PG I/PG II ratio of ≤3 have been proposed. However, previous meta-analyses reported insufficient systematic reviews and only pooled outcomes, which cannot determine the diagnostic validity of sPGA with a cut-off value of PG I ≤70 ng/mL and/or PG I/PG II ratio ≤3. We searched the core databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase) from their inception to April 2018. Fourteen and 43 studies were identified and analyzed for the diagnostic performance in CAG and gastric neoplasms, respectively. Values for sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the curve with a cut-off value of PG I ≤70 ng/mL and PG I/PG II ratio ≤3 to diagnose CAG were 0.59, 0.89, 12, and 0.81, respectively and for diagnosis of gastric cancer (GC) these values were 0.59, 0.73, 4, and 0.7, respectively. Methodological quality and ethnicity of enrolled studies were found to be the reason for the heterogeneity in CAG diagnosis. Considering the high specificity, non-invasiveness, and easily interpretable characteristics, sPGA has potential for screening of CAG or GC.
血清胃蛋白酶原检测(sPGA)可检测血清胃蛋白酶原(PG)I浓度及PG I/PG II比值,是一种用于预测慢性萎缩性胃炎(CAG)和胃部肿瘤的非侵入性检测方法。尽管已提出了各种临界值,但有人建议PG I≤70 ng/mL且PG I/PG II比值≤3。然而,先前的荟萃分析报告称系统评价不足,仅汇总了结果,无法确定PG I≤70 ng/mL和/或PG I/PG II比值≤3作为临界值时sPGA的诊断有效性。我们检索了核心数据库(MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆和Embase)自建库至2018年4月的文献。分别确定并分析了14项和43项关于CAG和胃部肿瘤诊断性能的研究。以PG I≤70 ng/mL和PG I/PG II比值≤3为临界值诊断CAG时,敏感性、特异性、诊断比值比和曲线下面积的值分别为0.59、0.89、12和0.81,诊断胃癌(GC)时这些值分别为0.59、0.73、4和0.7。研究发现,纳入研究的方法学质量和种族是CAG诊断异质性的原因。考虑到sPGA具有高特异性、非侵入性和易于解读的特点,其在CAG或GC筛查方面具有潜力。