Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Int J Urol. 2019 Aug;26(8):760-774. doi: 10.1111/iju.14005. Epub 2019 May 13.
To compare postoperative complications and health-related quality of life of patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with those of patients undergoing open radical cystectomy. A systematic search was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. A pooled meta-analysis was carried out to assess the differences between robot-assisted radical cystectomy and open radical cystectomy according to randomized and non-randomized comparative studies, respectively. We identified six randomized comparative studies and 31 non-randomized comparative studies. Most robot-assisted radical cystectomy patients were treated with extracorporeal urinary diversion. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy was associated with longer operative times, and lower blood loss and transfusion rates compared with open radical cystectomy in both randomized comparative studies and non-randomized comparative studies. There was no significant difference between robot-assisted radical cystectomy and open radical cystectomy in the rate of patients with any or major complications within 90 days both in randomized comparative studies and non-randomized comparative studies. Non-randomized comparative studies reported a lower rate of complications at 30 days, mortality at 90 days and length of stay for patients treated with robot-assisted radical cystectomy, which were not confirmed in randomized comparative studies. Additionally, there were no differences in postoperative quality of life score assessment at 3 and 6 months between robot-assisted radical cystectomy and open radical cystectomy. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy is associated with less blood loss and lower transfusion rates. There is no difference in complications, length of stay, mortality, and quality of life between robot-assisted radical cystectomy and open radical cystectomy. Data from non-randomized comparative studies favor perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted radical cystectomy patients, the failure to confirm in randomized comparative studies, likely due to bias in study design and reporting. Further randomized comparative studies comparing postoperative complications and quality of life between robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion and open radical cystectomy are required to assess potential differences between these two surgical approaches.
比较机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术患者的术后并发症和健康相关生活质量。根据系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选项目进行了系统搜索。分别对随机对照研究和非随机对照研究进行了汇总荟萃分析,以评估机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术之间的差异。我们确定了 6 项随机对照研究和 31 项非随机对照研究。大多数机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术患者接受了体外尿路转流。在随机对照研究和非随机对照研究中,与开放性根治性膀胱切除术相比,机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的手术时间更长,失血量和输血率更低。在随机对照研究和非随机对照研究中,90 天内任何并发症或主要并发症的发生率在机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术和开放性根治性膀胱切除术之间没有显著差异。非随机对照研究报告称,机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术患者的 30 天并发症发生率、90 天死亡率和住院时间较低,但在随机对照研究中并未得到证实。此外,机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术和开放性根治性膀胱切除术的术后 3 个月和 6 个月生活质量评分评估没有差异。机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与失血量减少和输血率降低有关。在并发症、住院时间、死亡率和生活质量方面,机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术没有差异。非随机对照研究的数据支持机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术患者的围手术期结局,但在随机对照研究中未得到证实,这可能是由于研究设计和报告存在偏倚。需要进一步进行随机对照研究,比较机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿路转流与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的术后并发症和生活质量,以评估这两种手术方法之间的潜在差异。