• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中性粒细胞 CD64 联合 CRP 对新生儿败血症的诊断价值:Meta 分析。

Diagnostic value of neutrophil CD64 combined with CRP for neonatal sepsis: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Fuling Central Hospital of Chongqing City, Chongqing 408000, China.

Department of Pediatrics, Fuling Central Hospital of Chongqing City, Chongqing 408000, China.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;37(8):1571-1576. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2019.05.001
PMID:31085013
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in newborns. CD64 combined with c-reactive protein (CRP) could improve the sensitivity and specificity of neonatal sepsis diagnosis, but the results were still controversial. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to clarify the importance of CD64 combined with CRP in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.

METHODS

The researches published as of December 24, 2018 were comprehensively searched in PubMed, Embase (included Embase and Medline), the Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Totally, 8 articles were included, involving 1114 objects. Statistical calculations were performed using Stata14.0 and Review Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracy of all included studies was pooled as follows: sensitivity, 0.95 (95% CI: 0.86-0.98); specificity, 0.86 (95% CI: 0.74-0.93); positive likelihood ratio (PLR), 6.8 (95% CI: 3.50-13.20); negative likelihood ratio (NLR), 0.06 (95% CI: 0.02-0.18); diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), 118.0 (95% CI: 25.00-549.00), and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.97). It was found that heterogeneity was not caused by threshold effect (P = 0.16), but the results of sensitivity (I = 87.57%) and specificity (I = 89.07%) analyses indicated significant heterogeneity between studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined application of CD64 and CRP improved the accuracy of neonatal sepsis diagnosis.

摘要

背景

败血症是新生儿发病率和死亡率的主要原因。CD64 联合 C 反应蛋白(CRP)可提高新生儿败血症诊断的灵敏度和特异性,但结果仍存在争议。因此,进行了这项荟萃分析以阐明 CD64 联合 CRP 在新生儿败血症诊断中的重要性。

方法

全面检索了截至 2018 年 12 月 24 日在 PubMed、Embase(包括 Embase 和 Medline)、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 上发表的研究。共纳入 8 项研究,涉及 1114 例患者。使用 Stata14.0 和 Review Manager 5.3 进行统计计算。

结果

所有纳入研究的诊断准确性汇总如下:灵敏度为 0.95(95%CI:0.86-0.98);特异度为 0.86(95%CI:0.74-0.93);阳性似然比(PLR)为 6.8(95%CI:3.50-13.20);阴性似然比(NLR)为 0.06(95%CI:0.02-0.18);诊断比值比(DOR)为 118.0(95%CI:25.00-549.00),曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.96(95%CI:0.94-0.97)。结果发现,异质性不是由阈值效应引起的(P=0.16),但敏感性(I=87.57%)和特异性(I=89.07%)分析结果表明研究之间存在显著的异质性。

结论

CD64 和 CRP 的联合应用提高了新生儿败血症的诊断准确性。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic value of neutrophil CD64 combined with CRP for neonatal sepsis: A meta-analysis.中性粒细胞 CD64 联合 CRP 对新生儿败血症的诊断价值:Meta 分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;37(8):1571-1576. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 3.
2
Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of neutrophil CD64 for neonatal sepsis.中性粒细胞CD64对新生儿败血症诊断准确性的Meta分析。
Ital J Pediatr. 2016 Jun 7;42(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13052-016-0268-1.
3
The combination of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein or presepsin alone improves the accuracy of diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.降钙素原和 C 反应蛋白或前降钙素单独联合应用可提高新生儿败血症诊断的准确性:一项荟萃分析和系统评价。
Crit Care. 2018 Nov 21;22(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2236-1.
4
Is neutrophil CD11b a special marker for the early diagnosis of sepsis in neonates? A systematic review and meta-analysis.中性粒细胞 CD11b 是否为新生儿脓毒症早期诊断的特异性标志物?系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 1;9(4):e025222. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025222.
5
Neutrophil CD64 combined with PCT, CRP and WBC improves the sensitivity for the early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.中性粒细胞CD64联合降钙素原、C反应蛋白和白细胞可提高新生儿败血症早期诊断的敏感性。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016 Feb;54(2):345-51. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2015-0277.
6
Neutrophil CD64 as a diagnostic marker for neonatal sepsis: Meta-analysis.中性粒细胞CD64作为新生儿败血症的诊断标志物:荟萃分析。
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2017 Mar-Apr;26(2):327-332. doi: 10.17219/acem/58782.
7
C-reactive Protein (CRP) as a Single Biomarker for Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis.C反应蛋白(CRP)作为诊断新生儿败血症的单一生物标志物:一项综合荟萃分析。
Mymensingh Med J. 2017 Apr;26(2):364-371.
8
Diagnostic Role of CD64 on Different Immune Cells in Early Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis.CD64在新生儿败血症早期诊断中对不同免疫细胞的诊断作用
Egypt J Immunol. 2018 Jun;25(2):35-44.
9
Diagnostic capacity of miRNAs in neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.miRNAs 在新生儿败血症中的诊断能力:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2024 Dec;37(1):2345850. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2024.2345850. Epub 2024 May 7.
10
Diagnostic value of neutrophil CD64, procalcitonin, and interleukin-6 in sepsis: a meta-analysis.中性粒细胞 CD64、降钙素原和白细胞介素-6 在脓毒症中的诊断价值:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 26;21(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06064-0.

引用本文的文献

1
nCD64 index as a new early predictive biomarker for macrophage activation syndrome in adult-onset still's disease.nCD64指数作为成人斯蒂尔病巨噬细胞活化综合征的一种新的早期预测生物标志物。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2025 Jul 10;27(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13075-025-03611-x.
2
Neutrophil CD64 index: a novel biomarker for risk stratification in acute pancreatitis.中性粒细胞CD64指数:急性胰腺炎风险分层的一种新型生物标志物。
Front Immunol. 2025 Apr 16;16:1526122. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1526122. eCollection 2025.
3
The Role of Neutrophil CD11b Compared to Neutrophil CD64 as an Early Diagnostic, Monitoring, and Prognostic Sepsis Marker in Neonatal ICUs: Case-Control-Methodological Study.
与中性粒细胞CD64相比,中性粒细胞CD11b作为新生儿重症监护病房早期诊断、监测和预后脓毒症标志物的作用:病例对照方法学研究
Biomed Res Int. 2025 Mar 12;2025:7206112. doi: 10.1155/bmri/7206112. eCollection 2025.
4
Comparison of the accuracy of hematological parameters in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a network meta-analysis.血液学参数在新生儿败血症诊断中的准确性比较:一项网状Meta分析
Infection. 2025 Feb;53(1):231-239. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02354-2. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
5
Flow Cytometry as the Tool to Define Peripheral Blood Leukocyte Signatures in Acute EBV Infection.流式细胞术作为定义急性 EBV 感染外周血白细胞特征的工具。
Cells. 2024 Jun 3;13(11):963. doi: 10.3390/cells13110963.
6
Neutrophil CD64 index as a new early predictive biomarker for infected pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis.中性粒细胞 CD64 指数作为急性胰腺炎感染性胰腺坏死的新型早期预测生物标志物。
J Transl Med. 2024 Feb 29;22(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-04901-9.
7
Biomarkers in sepsis-looking for the Holy Grail or chasing a mirage!脓毒症中的生物标志物——寻找圣杯还是追逐幻影!
World J Crit Care Med. 2023 Sep 9;12(4):188-203. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v12.i4.188.
8
Diagnostic performance of Neutrophil CD64 index, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein for early sepsis in hematological patients.中性粒细胞CD64指数、降钙素原及C反应蛋白对血液病患者早期脓毒症的诊断效能
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Mar 6;10(7):2127-2137. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i7.2127.
9
The Accuracy of 16S rRNA Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis: A Meta-Analysis.16S rRNA 聚合酶链反应诊断新生儿败血症的准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 May 12;2021:5550387. doi: 10.1155/2021/5550387. eCollection 2021.
10
Future Biomarkers for Infection and Inflammation in Febrile Children.发热儿童感染和炎症的未来生物标志物。
Front Immunol. 2021 May 17;12:631308. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.631308. eCollection 2021.