Hashem Heba E, Ahmed Wafaa O, Hassan Safeya H
Clinical Pathology Department, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt.
Biomed Res Int. 2025 Mar 12;2025:7206112. doi: 10.1155/bmri/7206112. eCollection 2025.
Early diagnosis and treatment of neonatal sepsis are crucial to cut off its major medical consequences: lifelong morbidities, neurodevelopmental disabilities, and a high number of neonatal mortalities. This study is aimed at determining the diagnostic and prognostic performance of CD11b as a sepsis biomarker for detecting neonatal sepsis at early stages compared to nCD64 and the other conventional sepsis parameters. Two hundred eleven neonates were enrolled from three Egyptian neonatal ICUs (NICUs), and they were classified into two main groups: the control group ( = 101) and the sepsis group ( = 110). Enrolled neonates were subjected to full sepsis screening, including complete blood count (CBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), blood cultures, and flow cytometry analysis for both CD64 and CD11b on the neutrophil surface (results represented as a percentage (percent) and mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) units for either biomarker). nCD64% (median = 44.15%) was significantly enhanced in the sepsis group compared to the controls (median = 25%), achieving 90.8% specificity, 92.8% sensitivity, and AUC = 0.894, respectively. CD64 MFI and CD11b MFI could differentiate between sepsis and control groups but with low undesirable diagnostic performance (sensitivity: 72.5% and 59.1%; specificity: 54.4% and 69.4%; AUC: 0.634 and 0.144, respectively). CD11b% could not discriminate between sepsis and control neonates (sensitivity and specificity of 31.8% and 73.6%, respectively) with an AUC of 0.405. hs-CRP had moderate diagnostic performance, achieving sensitivity and specificity of 69% and 78.15%, respectively, and AUC = 0.586. ROC analysis showed that combined hs-CRP and CD64% results had the highest sensitivity and specificity in the current study, being 93.9% and 97.2%, with AUC = 0.938, respectively. CD64%, CD64 MFI, CD11b MFI, and hs-CRP are increased in neonates with sepsis comparable to the controls. CD64% has a superior diagnostic performance comparable to nCD11b and hs-CRP. Combined nCD64 with hs-CRP measurement can provide rapid and accurate diagnostic modality for sepsis diagnosis in correlation with the patient's clinical condition and context with the results of other hematological indices; neutrophil CD64 can be routinely applicable in NICUs for better sepsis management. It is statistically evident that nCD11b is less ideal compared to nCD64 as a diagnostic, prognostic, or monitoring sepsis marker.
终身发病、神经发育障碍以及大量新生儿死亡。本研究旨在确定与中性粒细胞CD64(nCD64)及其他传统败血症参数相比,CD11b作为败血症生物标志物在早期检测新生儿败血症时的诊断和预后性能。从埃及的三个新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)招募了211名新生儿,他们被分为两个主要组:对照组(n = 101)和败血症组(n = 110)。对纳入的新生儿进行全面的败血症筛查,包括全血细胞计数(CBC)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、血培养以及对中性粒细胞表面的CD64和CD11b进行流式细胞术分析(两种生物标志物的结果均以百分比(%)和平均荧光强度(MFI)单位表示)。与对照组(中位数 = 25%)相比,败血症组的nCD64%(中位数 = 44.15%)显著升高,特异性达到90.8%,敏感性达到92.8%,曲线下面积(AUC)= 0.894。CD64 MFI和CD11b MFI能够区分败血症组和对照组,但诊断性能不理想(敏感性分别为72.5%和59.1%;特异性分别为54.4%和69.4%;AUC分别为0.634和0.144)。CD11b%无法区分败血症新生儿和对照新生儿(敏感性和特异性分别为31.8%和73.6%),AUC为0.405。高敏CRP(hs-CRP)具有中等诊断性能,敏感性和特异性分别为69%和78.15%,AUC = 0.586。ROC分析表明,在本研究中,hs-CRP和CD64%的联合结果具有最高的敏感性和特异性,分别为93.9%和97.2%,AUC = 0.938。与对照组相比,败血症新生儿的CD64%、CD64 MFI、CD11b MFI和hs-CRP均升高。CD64%具有优于nCD11b和hs-CRP的诊断性能。将nCD64与hs-CRP测量相结合,可以根据患者的临床情况以及其他血液学指标的结果,为败血症诊断提供快速准确的诊断方式;中性粒细胞CD64可在NICU中常规应用,以更好地管理败血症。统计学上明显的是,与nCD64相比,nCD11b作为诊断、预后或监测败血症的标志物不太理想。