• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于对遭受挥鞭样损伤的患者进行院前分诊的风险分层工具。

A risk stratification tool for prehospital triage of patients exposed to a whiplash trauma.

机构信息

Hälsan & Arbetslivet, Occupational Health Care Unit, Region Västra Götaland, Alingsås, Sweden.

Department of Public Health and Community Medicine Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 May 14;14(5):e0216694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216694. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0216694
PMID:31086405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6516661/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to develop a risk stratification model to predict the presence of a potentially more sinister injury in patients exposed to a whiplash trauma.

METHODS

The study base comprised of 3,115 residents who first sought healthcare contact within one week after being exposed to a whiplash trauma between 1999-2008, from within a defined geographical area, Skaraborg County in south-western Sweden. Information about gender, age, time elapsed prior to seeking care, type of health care contact, and hospitalisation was retrieved. Seventeen potential risk factors were identified and evaluated using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 3,115 patients, 215 (6.9%) required hospital admission so theoretically 93% could have been initially assessed by primary health care. However, only 46% had their first contact in primary health care. All patients had symptoms resulting in a diagnosis of whiplash injury. Four risk factors were found to be associated with hospital admission: commotio cerebri (OR 31, 19-51), fracture / luxation (OR 11, 5.1-22), serious injury (OR 41, 8.0-210), and the patient sought care during the same day as the trauma (OR 5.9, 3.7-9.5). These four risk factors explained 27% of the variation for hospital admission and the area under curve (AUC) was 0.77 (0.74-0.80). Ninety-six percent of patients (2,985) had only a whiplash injury with no other injury. These could be split into those attending health care the same day as the trauma, 1,737 (56%) with a 7.1% risk for hospital admission, and those attending health care later, 1,248 (40%) with a 1.3% risk for hospital admission.

CONCLUSION

Patients with no signs of commotio cerebri, no fracture/luxation injury, no serious injury, comprising 96% of all patients exposed to a whiplash trauma can initially be referred to primary health care for initial assessment. However, those contacting the health care the same day as the trauma should be referred to a hospital for evaluation if they can't get an appointment with a general practitioner the same day.

摘要

目的

我们旨在开发一种风险分层模型,以预测在遭受挥鞭样损伤的患者中存在潜在更严重损伤的可能性。

方法

研究基础包括 1999-2008 年间在瑞典西南部斯科讷省的一个特定地理区域内首次寻求医疗接触的 3115 名居民。检索了有关性别、年龄、寻求医疗前的时间间隔、医疗接触类型和住院的信息。确定并使用多变量逻辑回归评估了 17 个潜在的危险因素。

结果

在 3115 名患者中,215 名(6.9%)需要住院治疗,因此理论上 93%的患者可以在最初由初级保健评估。然而,只有 46%的患者在初级保健中进行了首次接触。所有患者均有导致挥鞭样损伤诊断的症状。发现 4 个危险因素与住院治疗有关:脑震荡(OR 31,19-51)、骨折/脱位(OR 11,5.1-22)、严重损伤(OR 41,8.0-210)以及患者在创伤发生当天寻求治疗(OR 5.9,3.7-9.5)。这四个危险因素解释了住院治疗的 27%的变化,曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.77(0.74-0.80)。96%(2985 名)的患者仅患有挥鞭样损伤而无其他损伤。这些患者可以分为在创伤发生当天就诊的患者(1737 名,占 56%),其中有 7.1%的住院治疗风险,以及在稍后就诊的患者(1248 名,占 40%),其中有 1.3%的住院治疗风险。

结论

在所有遭受挥鞭样损伤的患者中,没有脑震荡、骨折/脱位损伤、严重损伤的迹象的患者占 96%,可以最初被转诊到初级保健进行初步评估。然而,如果他们无法在同一天预约全科医生,当天就诊的患者应被转介到医院进行评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac18/6516661/51d7006edcab/pone.0216694.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac18/6516661/51d7006edcab/pone.0216694.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac18/6516661/51d7006edcab/pone.0216694.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A risk stratification tool for prehospital triage of patients exposed to a whiplash trauma.用于对遭受挥鞭样损伤的患者进行院前分诊的风险分层工具。
PLoS One. 2019 May 14;14(5):e0216694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216694. eCollection 2019.
2
Gender differences in care-seeking behavior and healthcare consumption immediately after whiplash trauma.挥鞭样损伤后即刻寻求医疗行为和医疗保健消费中的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 25;12(4):e0176328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176328. eCollection 2017.
3
The influence of psychosocial factors on recovery following acute whiplash trauma.社会心理因素对急性挥鞭样损伤后恢复的影响。
Dan Med J. 2012 Dec;59(12):B4560.
4
Incidence and outcome of whiplash injury after multiple trauma.多发伤后挥鞭样损伤的发生率及预后
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Apr 1;32(7):776-81. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000259223.77957.76.
5
Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo following whiplash injury: a myth or a reality?颈鞭伤后良性阵发性位置性眩晕:是臆想还是现实?
Am J Otolaryngol. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):376-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2010.07.009. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
6
Admission Triage With Pain, Inspiratory Effort, Cough Score can Predict Critical Care Utilization and Length of Stay in Isolated Chest Wall Injury.胸痛、吸气努力、咳嗽评分入院分诊可预测孤立性胸壁损伤患者的重症监护利用和住院时间。
J Surg Res. 2022 Sep;277:310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 May 6.
7
Correlation Between the Revised Trauma Score and Injury Severity Score: Implications for Prehospital Trauma Triage.修订创伤评分与损伤严重程度评分之间的相关性:对院前创伤分诊的启示
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Mar-Apr;23(2):263-270. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1489019. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
8
Does injury pattern among major road trauma patients influence prehospital transport decisions regardless of the distance to the nearest trauma centre? - a retrospective study.主要道路创伤患者的损伤模式是否会影响创伤中心距离的院前转运决策?-一项回顾性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Feb 13;27(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0593-7.
9
Post-trauma ratings of pre-collision pain and psychological distress predict poor outcome following acute whiplash trauma: a 12-month follow-up study.创伤前碰撞时疼痛和心理困扰的评分可预测急性挥鞭样损伤后的不良结局:一项为期12个月的随访研究。
Pain. 2008 Oct 15;139(2):248-259. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.04.008. Epub 2008 May 21.
10
Prehospital triage for mass casualty incidents using the META method for early surgical assessment: retrospective validation of a hospital trauma registry.运用 META 方法对大量伤员事件进行院前分诊用于早期外科评估:医院创伤登记处的回顾性验证。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr;46(2):425-433. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1040-6. Epub 2018 Nov 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study of "Talk and Die" After Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤后“说后即死”的多中心回顾性队列研究
World Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;107:82-86. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.117. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
2
The spectrum of mild traumatic brain injury: A review.轻度创伤性脑损伤的谱系:综述
Neurology. 2017 Aug 8;89(6):623-632. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004214. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
3
Gender differences in care-seeking behavior and healthcare consumption immediately after whiplash trauma.挥鞭样损伤后即刻寻求医疗行为和医疗保健消费中的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 25;12(4):e0176328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176328. eCollection 2017.
4
General practitioners knowledge and management of whiplash associated disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder: implications for patient care.全科医生对挥鞭样损伤相关疾病和创伤后应激障碍的认知与管理:对患者护理的启示
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jul 20;17:82. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0491-2.
5
Management of neck pain and associated disorders: A clinical practice guideline from the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration.颈部疼痛及相关疾病的管理:安大略省交通伤管理协议(OPTIMa)协作组的临床实践指南。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2000-22. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4467-7. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
6
Are manual therapies, passive physical modalities, or acupuncture effective for the management of patients with whiplash-associated disorders or neck pain and associated disorders? An update of the Bone and Joint Decade Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders by the OPTIMa collaboration.手法治疗、被动物理治疗方式或针灸对挥鞭样相关疾病或颈部疼痛及相关疾病患者的管理是否有效?由OPTIMa合作组织对骨与关节十年颈部疼痛及其相关疾病特别工作组的更新。
Spine J. 2016 Dec;16(12):1598-1630. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.08.024. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
7
Whiplash-Associated Disorders : Clinical and medico-legal guidelines on the methods of ascertainment.挥鞭样相关疾病:诊断方法的临床与法医学指南
Int J Legal Med. 2016 Jan;130(1):13-22. doi: 10.1007/s00414-015-1243-x. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
8
Sick Leave within 5 Years of Whiplash Trauma Predicts Recovery: A Prospective Cohort and Register-Based Study.挥鞭样创伤后5年内的病假情况可预测康复:一项前瞻性队列研究和基于登记的研究
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 22;10(6):e0130298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130298. eCollection 2015.
9
Are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs effective for the management of neck pain and associated disorders, whiplash-associated disorders, or non-specific low back pain? A systematic review of systematic reviews by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration.非甾体抗炎药对颈部疼痛及相关疾病、挥鞭样损伤相关疾病或非特异性下腰痛的治疗是否有效?安大略省交通伤管理协议(OPTIMa)协作组的一项系统评价的系统综述。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jan;25(1):34-61. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3891-4. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
10
Is multimodal care effective for the management of patients with whiplash-associated disorders or neck pain and associated disorders? A systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration.多模式护理对挥鞭样损伤相关疾病或颈部疼痛及相关疾病患者的管理是否有效?安大略省交通伤管理协议(OPTIMa)协作组的系统评价。
Spine J. 2016 Dec;16(12):1541-1565. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.06.019. Epub 2014 Jul 8.