Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.
Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
J Surg Res. 2022 Sep;277:310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 May 6.
Damage to the thoracic cage is common in the injured patient, both when the injuries are confined to this single cavity and as part of the overall injury burden of a polytraumatized patient. In a subset of these patients, the severity of injury to the intrathoracic viscera is either underappreciated at admission or blossom over the following 48-72 h. The ability to promptly identify these patients and abrogate complications therefore requires triage of such at-risk patients to close monitoring in a critical care environment. At our institution, this triage hinges on the Pain, Inspiratory effort, Cough (PIC) score, which generates a composite unitless score from a nomogram which aggregates several variables-patient-reported Pain visual analog scale, Incentive spirometry effort, and the perceived adequacy of Cough. We thus sought to audit PIC's discriminant power in predicting intensive care unit (ICU) need.
This retrospective cohort study was performed at an urban, academic, level 1 trauma center. All isolated chest wall injuries (excluded any Abbreviated Injury Score >2 in head or abdomen) from January 2020 to June 2021 were identified in the local trauma registry. The electronic medical record was queried for standard demographics, admission PIC score, postadmission destination, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), and any unplanned admissions to the ICU. Chi-squared tests were used to determine differences between PIC score outcomes and the recursive partitioning method correlated admission PIC score to ICU LOS.
Two hundred and thirty six isolated chest wall injury patients were identified, of whom 194 were included in the final analysis. The median age was 60 (interquartile range [IQR] 50-74) years, 63.1% were male, and the median (IQR) number of rib fractures was 3.0 (2.0-5.0). A cutoff PIC score of 7 or lower was associated with ICU admission (odds ratio [OR] 95% CI: 8.19 [3.39-22.55], P < 0.001 with a PPV = 41.4%, NPV = 91%), and with ICU admission for greater than 48 h [OR (95% CI): 26.86 (5.5-43.96), P < 0.001, with a PPV = 25.9%, NPV = 98.7%] but not anatomic injury severity score, hospital LOS or ICU, or the requirement for mechanical ventilation. The association between PIC score 7 or below and the presence of bilateral fractures, flail chest, or sternal fracture did not meet statistical significance. The accurate cut point of the PIC score to predict ICU admission over 48 h in our retrospective cohort was calculated as PIC ≤ 7 for P = 0.013 and PIC ≤ 6 for P = 0.001.
Patients with isolated chest wall injuries require effective reproducible triage for ICU-level care. The PIC score appears to be a moderate discriminator of critical care need, per se, as judged by our recorded complication rate requiring critical care intervention. This vigilance may pay dividends in early detection and abrogation of respiratory failure emergencies. Furthermore, PIC score delineation for ICU need appears to be appropriate at 7 or less; this threshold can be used during admission triage to guide care.
在受伤患者中,胸廓损伤很常见,无论是在单一胸腔损伤时,还是在多发伤患者的整体损伤负担中。在这些患者中,有一部分患者的胸腔内脏器损伤严重程度在入院时被低估,或者在接下来的 48-72 小时内恶化。因此,要及时发现这些患者并预防并发症,需要对这些高危患者进行分诊,以便在重症监护环境中进行密切监测。在我们的机构中,这种分诊依赖于疼痛、吸气努力、咳嗽(PIC)评分,该评分根据一个没有单位的综合评分从一个图表中生成,该图表汇总了几个变量——患者报告的疼痛视觉模拟评分、激励性肺活量计努力和咳嗽的可感知充分性。因此,我们试图审查 PIC 在预测重症监护病房(ICU)需求方面的判别能力。
这是一项在城市学术一级创伤中心进行的回顾性队列研究。在当地创伤登记处确定了 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月期间所有孤立性胸壁损伤(排除头部或腹部任何简明损伤评分>2)。通过电子病历查询了标准人口统计学数据、入院时的 PIC 评分、入院后去向、入住 ICU 时间和住院时间( LOS),以及任何意外入住 ICU 的情况。使用卡方检验来确定 PIC 评分结果之间的差异,并使用递归分区方法将入院时的 PIC 评分与 ICU LOS 相关联。
共确定了 236 例孤立性胸壁损伤患者,其中 194 例纳入最终分析。中位年龄为 60 岁(四分位间距 [IQR] 50-74),63.1%为男性,中位数(IQR)肋骨骨折数为 3.0(2.0-5.0)。 PIC 评分 7 或更低与 ICU 入院相关(比值比 [OR] 95%CI:8.19 [3.39-22.55], P < 0.001,阳性预测值 [PPV] = 41.4%,阴性预测值 [NPV] = 91%),与 ICU 入住时间超过 48 小时相关(OR [95%CI]:26.86 [5.5-43.96], P < 0.001,PPV = 25.9%,NPV = 98.7%),但与解剖损伤严重程度评分、住院时间或 ICU 或机械通气的需求无关。 PIC 评分 7 或以下与双侧骨折、连枷胸或胸骨骨折之间的关联没有统计学意义。在我们的回顾性队列中, PIC 评分预测 ICU 入住 48 小时以上的准确切点计算为 PIC ≤ 7, P = 0.013 和 PIC ≤ 6, P = 0.001。
孤立性胸壁损伤患者需要有效的、可重复的 ICU 级护理分诊。 PIC 评分似乎是判断重症监护需求的一个中等判别器,正如我们记录的需要重症监护干预的并发症率所判断的那样。这种警惕性可能会在早期发现和预防呼吸衰竭急症方面带来好处。此外, PIC 评分用于 ICU 需求的划分似乎在 7 分或以下是合适的;该阈值可用于入院分诊,以指导护理。